Skip to main content
Log in

Authorship and citation cultural nature in Density Functional Theory from solid state computational packages

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Density functional theory is the most used methodology in the characterization of the electronic structure of materials. Its applications have spread out to almost every STEM field and it is recognized as one of the most successful theories in materials science. In this paper we measure the specific impact of this theory by means of the citation record of the most important solid-state first principle ab initio packages. We report the exponential growth of publications and how the different electronic structure packages are supporting different scientific communities. Analysis of the growing community, relations between different communities, network strength, relation between citations and number of publications with respect to country of origin of the authors, number of authors per paper, words per title and publication journal is performed. We make several interesting observations, e.g., regarding the connection between the countries where the packages are developed and used, or concerning the collaboration networks. We also find bibliometrical evidence for the specialization of the software packages, even if they include similar capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset that supports the findings of this study is available in Figshare with the identifier https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/bibliometric_DFT/12494654/4.

References

  • Amin, M., & Mabe, M. (2004). Impact factors use and abuse. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST).

  • Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arya, C., & Sharma, S. (2011). Authorship trends and collaborative research in veterinary sciences: A bibliometric study. Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, 34, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A.-L., et al. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical mechanics and its applications, 311(3–4), 590–614.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, S., Klein, E., & Loper, E. (2009). Natural language processing with python. Sebastopol, CA, USA: O’Reilly Media.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Blaha, P., Schwarz, K., Madsen, G.K.H., Kvasnicka, D., Luitz, J., (2001). “wien2k”. In: An augmented plane wave+ local orbitals program for calculating crystal properties.

  • Chow, D. S., Ha, R., & Filippi, C. G. (2015). Increased rates of authorship in radiology publications: A bibliometric analysis of 142,576 articles published worldwide by radiologists between 1991 and 2012. American Journal of Roentgenology, 204(1), W52–W57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, B. (2015). “Papers with shorter titles get more citations”. In: Nature News.

  • Dumaz, M. (2020). pyBilio. https://github.com/romerogroup/pyBiblio.

  • Garfield, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: a brief review.

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H.-J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics, 45(2), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, N. T. (2008). Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: Source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis. PLoS One, 3(12), e4021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haunschild, R., Barth, A., & French, B. (2019). A comprehensive analysis of the history of DFT based on the bibliometric method RPYS. Journal of Cheminformatics, 11(1), 72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haunschild, R., Barth, A., & Marx, W. (2016). Evolution of DFT studies in view of a scientometric perspective. Journal of cheminformatics, 8(1), 52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haunschild, R. & Marx, W. (2020). Discovering seminal works with marker papers. In: Scientometrics, pp. 1–15.

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohenberg, P., & Kohn, W. (1964). Inhomogeneous electron gas. Physical Review, 136(3B), B864.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. D. (2007). Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing in Science and Engineering, 9(3), 90–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, W., & Jeu, S. L. (1965). Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Physical Review, 140(4A), A1133.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V., et al. (2015). Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1323–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. W., (2014). Obliteration by incorporation. In: Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact, pp. 129–149

  • McKinney, W., (2010). Data structures for statistical computing in Python. In: ed. by Stéfan van der Walt and Jarrod Millman, pp. 51–56. https://doi.org/10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a.

  • Moed, H. F. (2006). Citation analysis in research evaluation (Vol. 9). Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliphant, T. E. (2006). A guide to NumPy. USA: Trelgol Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996). Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical review letters, 77(18), 3865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, H., & Van Raan, A. (1991). Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis: An exercise on a university faculty level. Scientometrics, 20(1), 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCImago, . (2007). SJR-SCImago Journal & Country Rank.

  • Stéfan van der Walt, S., Colbert, C., & Varoquaux, G. (2011). The NumPy array: A structure for efficient numerical computation. Computing in Science and Engineering, 13(2), 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noorden, V., Richard, B. M., & Nuzzo, R. (2014). The top 100 papers. Nature News, 514(7524), 550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Marie Dumaz and Reese Boucher downloaded the data from the Web of Science database and created the corresponding packages for data cleaning and data analysis. Marie Dumaz, Miguel A.L. Marques and Aldo H. Romero did the data analysis, created the data figures and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Dumaz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This work was supported by NSF SI2-SSE Grant 1740112, DMREF-NSF 1434897, DOE DE-SC0016176 and DE-SC0019491 grants.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 2276 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dumaz, M., Boucher, R., Marques, M.A.L. et al. Authorship and citation cultural nature in Density Functional Theory from solid state computational packages. Scientometrics 126, 6681–6695 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04057-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04057-z

Keywords

Navigation