Abstract
Over the past few decades, the rising economic power of China has led to the expansion of its indigenous science and technology capacity. However, the key characteristics and patterns of the Chinese catch-up process have been mainly explained based on patenting activities that only reflect the progress of technological capabilities accumulation. Therefore, this paper seeks to expand the conventional understanding of China’s technological upgrading based on the flying geese model by analyzing scientific knowledge production using hierarchical cluster analysis and examination of the similarities and differences between Chinese and latecomers’ scientific patterns. The results show that China has reached the same level of scientific publication capacity as Japan and Korea since 2006, and has recently overtaken Japan to become the biggest scientific powerhouse in the Asia Pacific region. Additionally, during the catch-up period, China’s scientific portfolio demonstrates a combination of features that resemble both Korean and Taiwanese attributes. These findings partially contradict the traditional flying geese model and point out additional interpretations of the convergence and divergence of developmental paths among advanced countries and less developed nations. The study contributes to the theory of technological dominance in East Asia and to the understanding of China’s dominant role in knowledge production worldwide. Several implications and directions for future research regarding scientific advancement in emerging economies are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akamatsu, K. (1962). A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries. The Developing Economies,1, 3–25.
Albuquerque, E. D. M. E. (2001). Scientific infrastructure and catching-up process: Notes about a relationship illustrated by science and technology statistics. Revista brasileira de economia,55, 545–566.
Aoki, R. (1991). R&D competition for product innovation: An endless race. The American Economic Review,81(2), 252–256.
Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and “revealed” comparative advantage 1. The Manchester School,33(2), 99–123.
Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2020). How poverty ends. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2019-12-03/how-poverty-ends. Accessed February 23rd 2020.
Chang, P.-L., & Shih, H.-Y. (2005). Comparing patterns of intersectoral innovation diffusion in Taiwan and China: A network analysis. Technovation,25(2), 155–169.
Chiu, C.-Y., Liou, S.-N., & Kwan, L. (2016). Institutional and cultural contexts of creativity and innovation in China. In A. Y. Lewin, M. Kenney, & J. P. Murmann (Eds.), China's innovation challenge overcoming the middle-income trap (pp. 368–393). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Choung, J.-Y., & Hwang, H.-R. (2013). The evolutionary patterns of knowledge production in Korea. Scientometrics,94(2), 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0780-z.
Chuang, Y.-W., Lee, L.-C., Hung, W.-C., & Lin, P.-H. (2010). Forging into the innovation lead—A comparative analysis of scientific capacity. International Journal of Innovation Management,14(03), 511–529.
Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Schofer, E. (2003). Science in the modern world polity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Du Plessis, M. (2007). The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management,11(4), 20–29.
Fang, X. (2010). Re-examining the reform of China’s science and technology system: A historical perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 1(1), 7–17.
Furman, J. L., & Hayes, R. (2004). Catching up or standing still? National innovative productivity among ‘follower’ countries, 1978–1999. Research Policy,33(9), 1329–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.006.
Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., & Meyer, M. (2007). ‘Triad’or ‘tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics,74(1), 71–88.
Goldemberg, J. (1998). What is the role of science in developing countries? Science,279(5354), 1140–1141.
Harzing, A.-W., & Giroud, A. (2014). The competitive advantage of nations: An application to academia. Journal of Informetrics,8(1), 29–42.
Hewson, M. G. A. B. (1988). The ecological context of knowledge: Implications for learning science in developing countries. Journal of Curriculum Studies,20(4), 317–326.
Horlings, E., & Van den Besselaar, P. Convergence in science: Growth and structure of worldwide scientific output, 1993–2008. In 2011 Atlanta conference on science and innovation policy, 2011 (pp. 1–19). IEEE.
Hu, A. (2009). Quantitative assessment of China’s economic power and science and technology power in a comparative perspective. In K. Lee, J.-H. Kim, & W. T. Woo (Eds.), Power and sustainability of the Chinese State (pp. 43–58). London: Routledge.
Hu, A. G., & Jaffe, A. B. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: The cases of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization,21(6), 849–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00035-3.
Hu, M.-C. (2012). Technological innovation capabilities in the thin film transistor-liquid crystal display industries of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. Research Policy,41(3), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.013.
Huang, C., Su, J., Xie, X., Ye, X., Li, Z., Porter, A., et al. (2015). A bibliometric study of China’s science and technology policies: 1949–2010. Scientometrics,102(2), 1521–1539.
Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., Youtie, J., Porter, A. L., & Wang, X. (2016). How does national scientific funding support emerging interdisciplinary research: A comparison study of big data research in the US and China. PLoS ONE,11(5), e0154509.
Jinxiu, L. (2004). Scientific publication in China: An overview and some thoughts on improvement. Science, 27, 120–121.
Jones, G. (1971). The role of science and technology in developing countries. London: Oxford University Press.
Kwon, K.-S. (2011). The co-evolution of universities' academic research and knowledge-transfer activities: The case of South Korea. Science and Public Policy,38(6), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211x12960315267930.
Lattimore, R., & Revesz, J. (1996). Australian science: Performance from published papers. Australian Government Pub. Service. https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/science-papers/96-03.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2019.
Lee, K. (2011). Thirty years of catch-up in China, compared with Korea. In Y. Y. H.-M. Wu (Ed.), Reform and development in China (pp. 224–242). London: Routledge.
Lee, K. (2016). Innovation and technological specialization of Chinese industry. In A. Y. Lewin, M. Kenney, & J. P. Murmann (Eds.), China's innovation challenge: Overcoming the middle-income trap (pp. 108–120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, K., Cho, S.-J., & Jin, J. (2009a). Dynamics of catch-up in mobile phones and automobiles in China: Sectoral systems of innovation perspective. China Economic Journal,2(1), 25–53.
Lee, K., Hahn, D., & Lin, J. (2002). Is China following the East Asian model? A “comparative institutional analysis” perspective. China Review, 2(1), 85–120.
Lee, K., Jee, M., & Eun, J. H. (2011). Assessing China's economic catch-up at the firm level and beyond: Washington consensus, East Asian consensus and the Beijing model. Industry and Innovation,18(5), 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.583463.
Lee, K., Kim, J.-H., & Woo, W. T. (2009). Power and sustainability of the Chinese State. London: Routledge.
Lee, K., & Mathews, J. A. (2010). From Washington consensus to best consensus for world development. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature,24(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8411.2010.01251.x.
Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2005). Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics,63(3), 617–630.
Li, J., & Li, Y. (2015). Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences. Scientometrics,102(3), 1997–2010.
Li, S. H., & Lian, P. (1999). Decentralization and coordination: China's credible commitment to preserve the market under authoritarianism. China Economic Review,10(2), 161–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-951x(99)00011-5.
Li, S. M., Li, S. H., & Zhang, W. Y. (2000). The road to capitalism: Competition and institutional change in China. Journal of Comparative Economics,28(2), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2000.1653.
Mahmood, I. P., & Singh, J. (2003). Technological dynamism in Asia. Research Policy,32(6), 1031–1054.
May, R. M. (1997). The scientific wealth of nations. Science,275(5301), 793–796. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5301.793.
Mazzoleni, R., & Nelson, R. R. (2007). Public research institutions and economic catch-up. Research Policy,36(10), 1512–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.06.007.
Moed, H. (2002). Measuring China" s research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics,53(3), 281–296.
Moiwo, J. P., & Tao, F. (2013). The changing dynamics in citation index publication position China in a race with the USA for global leadership. Scientometrics,95(3), 1031–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0846-y.
Moravcsik, M. J. (1975). Science development: Toward the building of science in less developed countries. Bloomington: International Development Research Center, Indiana University.
Moya-Anegón, F., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2013). Worldwide topology of the scientific subject profile: A macro approach in the country level. PLoS ONE,8(12), e83222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083222.
Naughton, B. J. (2006). The Chinese economy: Transitions and growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Nerkar, A. (2003). Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Science,49(2), 211–229.
Nolan, P. (2002). China and the global business revolution. Cambridge Journal of Economics,26(1), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/26.1.119.
Odagiri, H., Goto, A., & Sunami, A. (2010). IPR and the Catch-up Process in Japan. In H. Odagiri, A. Goto, A. Sunami, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Intellectual property rights, development, and catch up: An international comparative study (pp. 133–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
OECD. (2002). Science and technology in China: Trends and policy challenges. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2008). OECD reviews of innovation policy. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2019). Main science and technology indicators. Accessed September 29th 2019.
Okubo, Y., Miquel, J.-F., Frigoletto, L., & Doré, J.-C. (1992). Structure of international collaboration in science: Typology of countries through multivariate techniques using a link indicator. Scientometrics,25(2), 321–351.
Orsmond, D. (2019). China’s economic choices. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/china-s-economic-choices. Accessed February 23rd 2020.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2014). Are there global shifts in the world science base? Analysing the catching up and falling behind of world regions. Scientometrics,101(3), 1897–1924.
Robert, C., Wilson, C., Venuta, A., Ferrari, M., & Arreto, C.-D. (2017). Evolution of the scientific literature on drug delivery: A 1974–2015 bibliometric study. Journal of Controlled Release,260, 226–233.
Rothwell, R. (2002). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. In J. Henry & D. Mayle (Eds.), Managing innovation and change. London: The Open University & SAGE Publications.
Schulz, P. A., & Manganote, E. J. (2012). Revisiting country research profiles: Learning about the scientific cultures. Scientometrics,93(2), 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0696-7.
SJR—SCImago Journal & Country Rank [Portal] (2019). https://www.scimagojr.com. Accessed September 8th 2019.
Shin, J.-S. (1996). The economics of the latecomers: Catching-up, technology transfer and institutions in Germany, Japan and South Korea. London: Routledge.
Smith, K. (1997). Economic infrastructures and innovation systems. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations (pp. 86–106). London: Pinter.
Srivastav, A., Kaur, T., Rani, L., & Kumar, A. (2019). Scientific research production of India and China in environmental chemistry: A bibliometric assessment. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16, 1–8.
Sternitzke, C. (2009). Technological specialization and patenting strategies in East Asia—Insights from the electronics industry. Scientometrics,78(1), 69–76.
Suda, M. (2019). China rises to world No. 2 in science research while Japan declines: Survey. https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20190506/p2a/00m/0na/002000c. Accessed September 20 2019.
Tassey, G. (1991). The functions of technology infrastructure in a competitive economy. Research Policy,20(4), 345–361.
Tollefson, J. (2018). China declared largest source of research articles. Nature,553(7689), 390–390. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-00927-4.
Vinkler, P. (1988). An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes. Scientometrics,13(5–6), 239–259.
Wang, B., Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., & Wen, Z. (2018). Emerging nanogenerator technology in China: A review and forecast using integrating bibliometrics, patent analysis and technology roadmapping methods. Nano Energy,46, 322–330.
Widgrén, M. (2005). Revealed comparative advantage in the Internal Market (No.989). ETLA Discussion Papers, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA).
WIPO. (2018). World intellectual property indicators 2018. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
Wu, C.-Y., & Mathews, J. A. (2012). Knowledge flows in the solar photovoltaic industry: Insights from patenting by Taiwan, Korea, and China. Research Policy,41(3), 524–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.007.
Xiwei, Z., & Xiangdong, Y. (2007). Science and technology policy reform and its impact on China's national innovation system. Technology in Society,29(3), 317–325.
Zheng, J., Zhao, Z.-Y., Zhang, X., Chen, D.-Z., Huang, M.-H., Lei, X.-P., et al. (2011). International scientific and technological collaboration of China from 2004 to 2008: A perspective from paper and patent analysis. Scientometrics,91(1), 65–80.
Zhou, P., & Glänzel, W. (2010). In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science. Scientometrics,82(3), 597–612.
Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research policy,35(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.006.
Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009a). Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? Scientometrics,79(3), 593–621.
Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009b). Regional analysis on Chinese scientific output. Scientometrics,81(3), 839–857.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government [NRF-2017R1A2B4007893] and the Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea, under an ITRC Program, [IITP-2020-2018-0-01402].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen, C.M., Choung, JY. Scientific knowledge production in China: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics 124, 1279–1303 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03507-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03507-4