Abstract
Balance (or evenness) as used in conventional approaches to measuring diversity needs careful definition. Nijssen et al. (Coenoses 13(1):33–38, 1998) used a mathematical approach to show that the Lorenz curve is an adequate representation of evenness and proposed that the Gini coefficient is a perfect indicator of balance. In this paper, we take an alternative thermodynamic perspective that leads to a very simple dimensionless measure of balance that ranges from 0 (perfect balance or evenness) to 1 (perfect unevenness or absolute concentration). It has the expected permutation invariance, scaling invariance, and replication invariance properties of a good evenness indicator and also has sensitivity to the transfer requirements (i.e. sensing the entropy changes correctly). It also has a naturalness property.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
del Valle, I., & Astorkiza, K. (2018). Exploring cross correlation among diversity indices. Fisheries Research, 204, 103–115.
Dincer, I., & Cengel, Y. A. (2001). Energy, entropy and exergy concepts and their roles in thermal engineering. Entropy, 3, 116–149.
Egghe, L. (2004). The source-item coverage of the Lotka function. Scientometrics, 61(1), 103–115.
Foldvary, F. E. (2006). The measurement of inequality, concentration and diversification. Indian Economic Journal. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1104829. Accessed 1 July 2018.
Goudarzian, P., & Erfanifard, S. Y. (2017). The efficiency of indices of richness, evenness and biodiversity in the investigation of species diversity changes (case study: migratory water birds of Parishan international wetland, Fars province, Iran). Biodiversity International Journal, 1(2), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.15406/bij.2017.01.00007.
Herfindahl, O. C. (1950). Concentration in the U.S. Steel Industry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, Columbia.
Hirschman, A. O. (1964). The paternity of an index. The American Economic Review, 54(5), 761.
Jost, L. (2010). The relation between evenness and diversity. Diversity, 2, 207–232.
Leydesdorff, L. (2018). Diversity and interdisciplinarity: How can one distinguish and recombine disparity, variety, and balance? Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2810-y.
Leydesdorff, L., Kogler, D. F., & Yan, B. (2017). Mapping patent classifications: Portfolio and statistical analysis, and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1573–1591.
Lorenz, M. O. (1905). Methods of measuring concentration of wealth. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 405, 209–291.
MacArthur, R. H. (1965). Patterns of species diversity. Biological Reviews, 40(4), 510–533.
Nijssen, D., Rousseau, R., & Van Hecke, P. (1998). The Lorenz curve: A graphical representation of evenness. Coenoses, 13(1), 33–38.
Prathap, G. (2011a). The Energy–Exergy–Entropy (or EEE) sequences in bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics, 87(3), 515–524.
Prathap, G. (2011b). Energy indicators and percentile ranking normalization. Scientometrics, 91(3), 997–1003.
Prathap, G. (2014). Quantity, quality, and consistency as bibliometric indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(1), 214.
Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287.
Rao, C. R. (1982). Diversity: Its measurement, decomposition, apportionment and analysis. Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 44(1), 1–22.
Rousseau, R. (2018). The repeat rate: From Hirschman to Stirling. Scientometrics, 116(1), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2724-8.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423.
Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 688, 163.
Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 4(15), 707–719.
Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Glanzel, W. (2016). Diversity of references as an indicator for interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(5), 1257–1265. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23487.
Zhou, Q., Rousseau, R., Yang, L., Yue, T., & Yang, G. (2012). A general framework for describing diversity within systems and similarity between systems with applications in informetrics. Scientometrics, 93(3), 787–812.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prathap, G. Balance: a thermodynamic perspective. Scientometrics 119, 247–255 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03020-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03020-3