Skip to main content
Log in

Balance: a thermodynamic perspective

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Balance (or evenness) as used in conventional approaches to measuring diversity needs careful definition. Nijssen et al. (Coenoses 13(1):33–38, 1998) used a mathematical approach to show that the Lorenz curve is an adequate representation of evenness and proposed that the Gini coefficient is a perfect indicator of balance. In this paper, we take an alternative thermodynamic perspective that leads to a very simple dimensionless measure of balance that ranges from 0 (perfect balance or evenness) to 1 (perfect unevenness or absolute concentration). It has the expected permutation invariance, scaling invariance, and replication invariance properties of a good evenness indicator and also has sensitivity to the transfer requirements (i.e. sensing the entropy changes correctly). It also has a naturalness property.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • del Valle, I., & Astorkiza, K. (2018). Exploring cross correlation among diversity indices. Fisheries Research, 204, 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dincer, I., & Cengel, Y. A. (2001). Energy, entropy and exergy concepts and their roles in thermal engineering. Entropy, 3, 116–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2004). The source-item coverage of the Lotka function. Scientometrics, 61(1), 103–115.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Foldvary, F. E. (2006). The measurement of inequality, concentration and diversification. Indian Economic Journal. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1104829. Accessed 1 July 2018.

  • Goudarzian, P., & Erfanifard, S. Y. (2017). The efficiency of indices of richness, evenness and biodiversity in the investigation of species diversity changes (case study: migratory water birds of Parishan international wetland, Fars province, Iran). Biodiversity International Journal, 1(2), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.15406/bij.2017.01.00007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herfindahl, O. C. (1950). Concentration in the U.S. Steel Industry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, Columbia.

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1964). The paternity of an index. The American Economic Review, 54(5), 761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, L. (2010). The relation between evenness and diversity. Diversity, 2, 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2018). Diversity and interdisciplinarity: How can one distinguish and recombine disparity, variety, and balance? Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2810-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Kogler, D. F., & Yan, B. (2017). Mapping patent classifications: Portfolio and statistical analysis, and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1573–1591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, M. O. (1905). Methods of measuring concentration of wealth. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 405, 209–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. (1965). Patterns of species diversity. Biological Reviews, 40(4), 510–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijssen, D., Rousseau, R., & Van Hecke, P. (1998). The Lorenz curve: A graphical representation of evenness. Coenoses, 13(1), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prathap, G. (2011a). The Energy–Exergy–Entropy (or EEE) sequences in bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics, 87(3), 515–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prathap, G. (2011b). Energy indicators and percentile ranking normalization. Scientometrics, 91(3), 997–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prathap, G. (2014). Quantity, quality, and consistency as bibliometric indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(1), 214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1982). Diversity: Its measurement, decomposition, apportionment and analysis. Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 44(1), 1–22.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (2018). The repeat rate: From Hirschman to Stirling. Scientometrics, 116(1), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2724-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 688, 163.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 4(15), 707–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Glanzel, W. (2016). Diversity of references as an indicator for interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(5), 1257–1265. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Q., Rousseau, R., Yang, L., Yue, T., & Yang, G. (2012). A general framework for describing diversity within systems and similarity between systems with applications in informetrics. Scientometrics, 93(3), 787–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gangan Prathap.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prathap, G. Balance: a thermodynamic perspective. Scientometrics 119, 247–255 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03020-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03020-3

Keywords

Navigation