Skip to main content
Log in

Research impact and productivity of Southeast Asian countries in language and linguistics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been observed that Southeast Asian countries and universities have ranked poorly in global research productivity and impact. The same is true for the field of language and linguistics. Some studies revealed that productivity and citation patterns in this field are lower compared to other fields of study. Thus, this study sought to examine the research performance of SEA countries and universities in the field of language and linguistics for efficient policy-making. The research performance of each SEA country and university was assessed through Scopus database using the following bibliometric indicators: total number of publications (P), total number of citations excluding self-citations (C), citations per publication (CPP), percent of non-cited articles (%PNC), and h-index. Findings revealed that SEA countries have only produced almost 2 % of all published articles in language and linguistics and around 1 % share in overall worldwide field citations. Interestingly, both the SEA countries and universities exhibit a trend toward increasing their yearly research productivity and citations. However, research productivity and citations in the field of language and linguistics are dominated by selected universities in each country particularly in Brunei, Singapore, Malaysia, and the Philippines. This study has implications for research policy-making and future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2012). The dispersion of research performance within and between universities as a potential indicator of the competitive intensity in higher education systems. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arik, E. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of linguistics in Web of Science. Journal of Scientometric Research, 4(1), 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2014). How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations. Scientometrics, 98(1), 487–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerovšek, T., & Mikoš, M. (2014). A comparative study of cross-domain research output and citations: Research impact cubes and binary citation frequencies. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. C., Tong, J. Y., & Zhang, F. F. (2013). Accounting research in the Asia-Pacific region: An update. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 41(4), 675–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Lo, H. L., Tzeng, P. C., Chiu, Y. W., Chiu, W. T., & Kuo, K. N. (2010). Comparison of the increasing number of published systematic reviews in selected countries in the Asia-Pacific region. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine, 2(2), 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., Mok, K. H., & Lucas, L. (2008). Transforming higher education in whose image? Exploring the concept of the ‘world-class’ university in Europe and Asia. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMaria, A. (2009). Research productivity among nations. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 54(25), 2460–2462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erfanmanesh, M., Jahromi, R. B., Hosseini, E., & Gholamhosseinzadeh, Z. (2013). Scientific productivity, impact and collaboration of the top Asian countries in Scopus during 1996–2010. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 7(1), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezema, I. J., & Asogwa, B. E. (2014). Citation analysis and authorship patterns of two linguistics journals. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 14(1), 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezema, I. J., & Ugwuanyi, C. F. (2014). Application of citation analysis in the development of core Nigerian Languages Texts in Nigeria University Libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1131/.

  • Genoni, P., & Haddow, G. (2009). ERA and the ranking of Australian humanities journals. Australian Humanities Review, 46, 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgas, H., & Cullars, J. (2005). A citation study of the characteristics of the linguistics literature. College & Research Libraries, 66(6), 496–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholizadeh, H., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Danaee, M., Ordi, A., Tanha, F., et al. (2014). Economic growth and internet usage impact on publication productivity among ASEAN’s and world’s best universities. Modern Applied Science, 8(5), 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, B. M., & Mahesh, G. (2013). A comparative analysis of social sciences research publications in four South Asian countries. Library Philosophy and Practice. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/956/.

  • Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacso, P. (2008). Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for FW Lancaster. Library Trends, 56(4), 784–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacsó, P. (2009). The h-index for countries in Web of Science and Scopus. Online Information Review, 33(4), 831–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliegl, R., & Bates, D. (2011). International collaboration in psychology is on the rise. Scientometrics, 87, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. N. (2003). The academic profession in Malaysia and Singapore: Between bureaucratic and corporate cultures. In P. Altbach (Ed.), The decline of the guru (pp. 135–165). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Lek, D. (2014). Cross border higher education in ASEAN: Structures, policies, development and integration. In ASEAN-Canada Research Partnership Working Paper Series (Vol. 4, pp. 1–26).

  • Levine, T. R. (2010). Rankings and trends in citation patterns of communication journals. Communication Education, 59(1), 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., & Van der Wende, M. (2007). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 306–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J. (2011). A bibliometric study of productivity and impact of modern language and literature research. Research Evaluation, 20(2), 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. V., & Pham, L. T. (2011). Scientific output and its relationship to knowledge economy: An analysis of ASEAN countries. Scientometrics, 89(1), 107–117.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation, Development (OECD). (2004). Internationalisation and trade in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prathap, G. (2006). Hirsch-type indices for ranking institutions’ scientific research output. Current Science, 91, 1439–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radev, D. R., Joseph, M. T., Gibson, B., & Muthukrishnan, P. (2016). A bibliometric and network analysis of the field of computational linguistics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 683–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubdy, R., & Tupas, T. R. F. (2009). Research in applied linguistics and language teaching and learning in Singapore (2000–2007). Language Teaching, 42(03), 317–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scopus. (2015). Content. https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/content.

  • Sombatsompop, N., Markpin, T., Ratchatahirun, P., Yochai, W., Ittiritmeechai, S., Premkamolnetr, N., et al. (2011). Research productivity and impact of ASEAN countries and universities in the field of energy and fuel. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16(1), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen, R. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Van Wijk, E. (2009). Benchmarking university-industry research cooperation worldwide: Performance measurements and indicators based on co-authorship data for the world’s largest universities. Research Evaluation, 18(1), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenabschätzung: Theorie und Praxis, 12(1), 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergidis, P. I., Karavasiou, A. I., Paraschakis, K., Bliziotis, I. A., & Falagas, M. E. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of global trends for research productivity in microbiology. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 24(5), 342–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinluan, L. R. (2011). Research productivity in education and psychology in the Philippines and comparison with ASEAN countries. Scientometrics, 91(1), 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessie S. Barrot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barrot, J.S. Research impact and productivity of Southeast Asian countries in language and linguistics. Scientometrics 110, 1–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2163-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2163-3

Keywords

Navigation