Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding the evolving academic landscape of library and information science through faculty hiring data

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a 40-year (from 1975 to 2015) hiring dataset of 642 library and Information science (LIS) faculty members from 44 US universities, this research reveals the disciplinary characteristics of LIS through several key aspects including gender, rank, country, university, major, and research area. Results show that genders and ranks among LIS faculty members are evenly distributed; geographically, more than 90 % of LIS faculty members received doctoral degrees in the US; meanwhile, 60 % of LIS faculty received Ph.D. in LIS, followed by Computer Science and Education; in regards to research interests, Human–Computer interaction, Digital Librarianship, Knowledge Organization and Management, and Information Behavior are the most popular research areas among LIS faculty members. Through a series of dynamic analyses, this study shows that the educational background of LIS faculty members is becoming increasingly diverse; in addition, research areas such as Human–Computer interaction, Social Network Analysis, Services for Children and Youth, Information Literacy, Information Ethics and Policy, and Data and Text Mining, Natural Language Processing, Machine Learning have received an increasing popularity. Predictive analyses are performed to discover trends on majors and research areas. Results show that the growth rate of LIS faculty members is linearly distributed. In addition, among faculty member’s Ph.D. majors, the share of LIS is decreasing while that the share of Computer Science is growing; among faculty members’ research areas, the share of Human–Computer interaction is on the rise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-library-information-science-programs/library-information-science-rankings.

  2. http://ischools.org/.

References

  • Amir, R., & Knauff, M. (2008). Ranking economics departments worldwide on the basis of PhD placement. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1), 185–190. doi:10.1162/rest.90.1.185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Åström, F. (2007). Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990–2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 947–957. doi:10.1002/asi.20567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, G., Danowski, J., Feeley, T., & Stalker, J. (2010). Measuring quality in communication doctoral education using network analysis of faculty-hiring patterns. Journal of Communication, 60(2), 388–411. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01487.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobinski, G. S. (1986). Doctoral programs in library and information science in the United States and Canada. Library Trends, 34(4), 697–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chronister, J. L., Gansneder, B. G., Baldwin, R. G., & Harper, E. P. (2001). Full-time women faculty off the tenure track: Profile and practice. The Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 237–257. doi:10.1353/rhe.2001.0003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Yan, E., Frazho, A., & Caverlee, J. (2009). PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2229–2243. doi:10.1002/asi.21171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H., Grofman, B., & Masuoka, N. (2007). Social networks in political science: Hiring and placement of Ph.D.s, 1960–2002. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(4), 729–739. doi:10.1017/S104909650707117X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, R. A. (2001). The prestige of Ph. D. granting departments of sociology: A simple network approach. Connections, 24(1), 68–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargens, L. L., & Long, J. S. (2002). Demographic inertia and women’s representation among faculty in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 494–517. doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. M., Gubler, J. R., Zelner, J., Bommarito, M. J, I. I., Provins, E., & Ingall, E. (2011). Reproduction of hierarchy? A social network analysis of the american law professoriate. Journal of Legal Education, 61(1), 76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschke, R., Nielsen, J. M., & Rankin, P. (2007). Demographic inertia revisited: An immodest proposal to achieve equitable gender representation among faculty in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 1–26. doi:10.1353/jhe.2007.0003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. A., Mucha, P. J., & Porter, M. A. (2011). Mathematical genealogy and department prestige. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 21(4), 041104. doi:10.1063/1.3668043.

  • Sugimoto, C. R., Li, D., Russell, T. G., Finlay, S. C., & Ding, Y. (2011a). The shifting sands of disciplinary development: Analyzing north american library and information science dissertations using latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 185–204. doi:10.1002/asi.21435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto, C. R., Ni, C., Russell, T. G., & Bychowski, B. (2011b). Academic genealogy as an indicator of interdisciplinarity: An examination of dissertation networks in library and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1808–1828. doi:10.1002/asi.21568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto, C. R., Russell, T. G., & Grant, S. (2009). Library and information science doctoral education: The landscape from 1930–2007. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 50(3), 190–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327:AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E. (2014). Topic-based pagerank: Toward a topic-level scientific evaluation. Scientometrics, 100(2), 407–437. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1308-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., Zeng, A., Fan, Y., & Di, Z. (2016). Ranking scientific publications with similarity-preferential mechanism. Scientometrics, 106(2), 805–816. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1805-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., & Yan, E. (2015). Dynamic subfield analysis of disciplines: An examination of the trading impact and knowledge diffusion patterns of computer science. Scientometrics, 104(1), 335–359. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1594-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015S1A3A2046711).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Yongjun Zhu & Erjia Yan

  2. Department of Library and Information Science, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea

    Min Song

Authors
  1. Yongjun Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erjia Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Min Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongjun Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Y., Yan, E. & Song, M. Understanding the evolving academic landscape of library and information science through faculty hiring data. Scientometrics 108, 1461–1478 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2033-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2033-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation