Abstract
Recent developments in Scandinavia may be of interest in relation to developing an integrated European research information structure that could provide the basis for an improved knowledge base for research policy. This article describes how reliable bibliographic data in institutional or national research information systems have been developed in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden with performance-based institutional funding models as a driver. It also discusses in more general terms the limitations and potentials of using data from research information systems in bibliometric analysis and in social studies of science.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlgren, P., Colliander, C., & Persson, O. (2012). Field normalized citation rates, field normalized journal impact and Norwegian weights for allocation of university research funds. Scientometrics, 92(3), 767–780.
Aksnes, D. W., Rorstad, K., Piro, F., & Sivertsen, G. (2011). Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 628–636.
Aksnes, D. W., Rorstad, K., Piro, F., & Sivertsen, G. (2013). Are mobile researchers more productive and cited than non-mobile researchers? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Research Evaluation, 22(4), 215–223.
Bahieu, B., Arnold, E., & Kolarz, P. (2014). Measuring scientific performance for improved policy making. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service.
Engels, T. C. E., Ossenblok, T. L. B., & Spruyt, E. H. J. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities 2000–2009. Scientometrics, 93(2), 373–390.
Flodström, A. (2011). Prestationsbaserad resurstilldelning för universitet och högskolor. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261.
Hicks, D. & Wang, J. (2010). Towards a Bibliometric database for the social sciences and humanities—a European scoping project. Final Report on Project for the European Science Foundation.
Kyvik, S., & Teigen, M. (1996). Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology and Human Values, 21(1), 54–71.
Ossenblok, T. L., Engels, T. C., & Sivertsen, G. (2012). The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science—a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005–9). Research Evaluation, 21(4), 280–290.
Sandström, U., & Sandström, E. (2008). Resources for citations. Stockholm: National Board for Higher Education. (in Swedish: Resurser för citeringar).
Schneider, J. W. (2009). An outline of the bibliometric indicator used for performance-based funding of research institutions in Norway. European Political Science, 8, 364–378.
Sivertsen, G. (2010). A performance indicator based on complete data for the scientific publication output at research institutions. ISSI Newsletter, 6, 22–28.
Sivertsen, G., & Larsen, B. (2012). Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: An empirical analysis of the potential. Scientometrics, 91(2), 567–575.
Swedish Research Council. (2015). Research quality evaluation in Sweden—FOKUS. Stockholm: Swedish Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sivertsen, G. Data integration in Scandinavia. Scientometrics 106, 849–855 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1817-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1817-x