Abstract
The analysis of the high end of citation distributions represented by its tail provides important supplementary information on the citation profile of the unit under study. In a previous study by Glänzel (Scientometrics 97:13–23, 2013a), a parameter-free solution providing four performance classes has been proposed. Unlike in methods based on pre-set percentiles, this method is not sensitive to ties and ensures needless integration of measures of outstanding and even extreme performance into the standard tools of scientometric performance assessment. The applicability of the proposed method is demonstrated for both subject analysis and the combination of different subjects at the macro and meso level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J., Gurney, K., & Marshall, S. (2007). Profiling citation impact: A new methodology. Scientometrics, 72(2), 325–344.
Beirlant, J., Glänzel, W., Carbonez, A., & Leemans, H. (2007). Scoring research output using statistical quantile plotting. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 185–192.
Beirlant, J., Goegebeur, Y., Segers, J., & Teugels, J. L. (2004). Statistics of extremes: Theory and application. Hoboken: Wiley.
Glänzel, W. (2007). Characteristic scores and scales. A bibliometric analysis of subject characteristics based on long-term citation observation. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 92–102.
Glänzel, W. (2013a). High-end performance or outlier? Evaluating the tail of scientometric distribution. Scientometrics, 97(1), 13–23.
Glänzel, W. (2013b). The application of citation-based performance classes in disciplinary and multidisciplinary assessment. In: J. Gorraiz, E. Schiebel, Ch. Gumpenberger, M. Hörlesberger, H.F. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2013—The 14th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 109–122). Vienna, Austria.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1988a). Theoretical and empirical studies of the tail of scientometric distributions. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics (pp. 75–83). London: Elsevier Science Publisher.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1988b). Characteristic scores and scales in assessing citation impact. Journal of Information Science, 14(2), 123–127.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for bibliometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56(3), 357–367.
Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., Thijs, B., & Debackere, K. (2009). Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance. Scientometrics, 78(1), 165–188.
Glänzel, W. Thijs, B. Debackere, K. (2013). The application of citation-based performance classes in institutional research assessment. In: S. Hinze, A. Lottmann (Eds.), “Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavour”, Proceedings of STI 2013 (18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators), pp. (122–129). Berlin.
Hill, B. M. (1975). A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution. Annals of Statistics, 3, 1163–1174.
Kratz, M., & Resnick, S. (1996). The qq-estimator of the index of regular variation. Communications in Statistics: Stochastic Models, 12, 699–724.
Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Opthof, T. (2011). Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: principles for comparing sets of documents. JASIST, 62(7), 1370–1381.
Matthys, G., Delafosse, E., Guillou, A., & Beirlant, J. (2004). Estimating catastrophic quantile levels for heavy-tailed distributions. Insurance Mathematics & Economics, 34(3), 517–537.
Rényi, A. (1953). On the theory of order statistics. Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 4(3–4), 191–231.
Waltman, L. Calero-Medina, C. Kosten, J. Noyons, E.C.M. Tijssen, R.J.W. van Eck, N.J. van Leeuwen, Th.N. van Raan, A.F.J. Visser, M.S. & Wouters, P. (2012). The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. In: Eric Archambault, Yves Gingras, & Vincent Lariviere (Eds.), Proceedings of STI 2012 (17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators), (pp. 791–802). Montreal.
Acknowledgments
The present study is an extended version of a article presented at the 14th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vienna (Austria), 15–19 July 2013 (Glänzel 2013). It also includes results presented at the 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, held in Berlin, 4–6 September 2013 (Glänzel et al. 2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glänzel, W., Thijs, B. & Debackere, K. The application of citation-based performance classes to the disciplinary and multidisciplinary assessment in national comparison and institutional research assessment. Scientometrics 101, 939–952 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1247-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1247-1