Abstract
“Delayed recognition” refers to the phenomenon where papers did not achieve recognition in terms of citations until some years after their original publication. A paper with delayed recognition was termed a “sleeping beauty”: a princess sleeps (goes unnoticed) for a long time and then, almost suddenly, is awakened (receives a lot of citations) by a prince (another article). There are a sleeping period and an awakening period in the definition of a “sleeping beauty”. Apart from and prior to the two periods, an awaking period was found in citation curves of some publications, “sleeping beauties” was hence expanded to “all-elements-sleeping-beauties”. The opposite effect of “delayed recognition” was described as “flash in the pan”: documents that were noticed immediately after publication but did not seem to have a lasting impact. In this work, we briefly discussed the citation curves of two remarkable “all-elements-sleeping-beauties”. We found they appeared “flash in the pan” first and then “delayed recognition”. We also found happy endings of sleeping beauties and princes, and hence suggest the citation curve of an “all-elements-sleeping-beauty” include an awaking period, a sleeping period, an awakening period and a happy ending.
References
Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159–170.
Aversa, E. S. (1985). Citation patterns of highly cited papers and their relationship to literature aging: A study of the working literature. Scientometrics, 7(3–6), 383–389.
Barber, B. (1961). Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery. Science, 134, 596–602.
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2010). On sleeping beauties, princes and other tales of citation distributions. Research Evaluation, 19(3), 195–202.
Burrell, Q. L. (2005). Are ‘sleeping beauties’ to be expected. Scientometrics, 65(3), 381–389.
Cole, S. (1970). Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoveries. American Journal of Sociology, 76, 286–306.
Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2010). Is scientific literature subject to a “sell-by-date”? A general methodology to analyze the “durability” of scientific documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 329–339.
De Rujula, A., Georgi, H., & Glashow, S. L. (1977). Molecular charmonium: New spectroscopy. Physical Review Letters, 38(7), 317–321.
Garfield, E. (1989). More delayed recognition. Part 1. Examples from the genetics of color blindness, the entropy of short-term memory, phosphoinositides, and polymer Rheology. Current Contents, 38, 3–8.
Garfield, E. (1990). More delayed recognition. Part 2. From inhibin to scanning electron microscopy. Current Contents, 9, 3–9.
Ginsparg, P. H., & Wilson, K. G. (1982). A remnant of chiral symmetry on the lattice. Physical Review D, 25(10), 2649–2657.
Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B., & Thijs, B. (2003). Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon. Scientometrics, 58(3), 571–586.
Lange, L. L. (2005). Sleeping beauties in psychology: Comparisons of ‘hits’ and ‘missed signals’ in psychological journals. History of Psychology, 8(2), 194–217.
Li, J., & Ye, F. Y. (2012). The phenomenon of all-elements-sleeping-beauties in scientific literature. Scientometrics, 92(3), 795–799.
Mingers, J. (2007). Shooting stars and sleeping beauties: The secret life of citations: Euro XXII, Prague (8–11 July).
Moed, H. F., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Reedijk, J. (1998). A new classification system to describe the ageing of scientific journals and their impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 54(4), 387–419.
Ohba, N., & Nakao, K. (2012). Sleeping beauties in ophthalmology. Scientometrics, 93(2), 253–264.
Stent, G. S. (1972). Prematurity and uniqueness in scientific discovery. Scientific American, 227(6), 84–93.
van Clester, B. (2012). It takes time: A remarkable example of delayed recognition. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2341–2344.
van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2005). Signals in science—On the importance of signaling in gaining attention in science. Scientometrics, 64(2), 209–233.
van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3), 467–472.
Wyatt, H. V. (1961). Knowledge and prematurity-journey from transformation to DNA. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 18(2), 149–156.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant No. 71203193) and the Zhijiang Youth Project of Zhejiang province (Grant No. 13ZJQN045YB) for financial support, and comments from Prof. Fred Y Ye, Ms. Helen F Xue and Mr. Star X Zhao. We also thank Dr. Langtao Huang and Mr. Dongbo Shi for providing background of Physics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, J. Citation curves of “all-elements-sleeping-beauties”: “flash in the pan” first and then “delayed recognition”. Scientometrics 100, 595–601 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1217-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1217-z