Skip to main content
Log in

Global trend in aquatic ecosystem research from 1992 to 2011

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aquatic ecosystems are ecologically important, but continuously threatened by a growing number of human induced changes. This study evaluates the research trends of “aquatic ecosystem” between 1992 and 2011 in journals of all subject categories of the science citation index and social sciences citation index. The analyzed parameters include publication output, cited publication, document type, language, distributions of journal, author, country and institutes, and analysis of author keywords and keywords plus. The results showed that over the past two decades, there was a consistent growth in publication output with involvement of increasing number of countries and institutions, and North America was still the leading region in the subject. Classification of the top 30 author keywords indicated that more research attentions were paid to the study on aquatic organism, water environment and aquatic ecosystem condition. Aquatic ecosystem, water quality, and fish were the top three most frequently used author keywords. In addition, owing to its significant impact on aquatic ecosystems, climate change has been placed crucial emphasis recently. Aquatic ecosystem research trend was shifting from water environment to aquatic ecosystem wide issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnell, N., Bates, B., Lang, H., Magnuson, J. J., & Mulholland, P. (1996). Hydrology and freshwater ecology. In R. T. Watson, Watson, M. C. Zinyowera, & R. H. Moss (Eds.), Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change. contribution of working group II to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 325–363). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belpaire, C., Smolders, R., Auweele, I. V., Ercken, D., Breine, J., Thuyne, G. V., et al. (2000). An index of biotic integrity characterizing fish populations and the ecological quality of Flandrian water bodies. Hydrobiologia, 434, 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddanda, B. A., Coleman, D. F., Johengen, T. H., Ruberg, S. A., Meadows, G. A., Van Sumeren, H. W., et al. (2006). Exploration of a submerged sinkhole ecosystem in Lake Huron. Ecosystems, 9, 828–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P. (2002). NetDraw network visualization. USA: Analytic technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. British Journal of Engineering, 137, 85–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian, M. W., Lisa, J. H., & Luis, M. M. (2002). Macroinvertebrate based index of biotic integrity for protection of streams in west-central Mexico. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 21, 686–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X. F., Huang, Y., Wang, J., & Luan, S. J. (2012). Research status and trends in limnology journals: a bibliometric analysis based on SCI database. Scientometrics, 92, 735–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., & Correll, D. L. (1998). Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications, 8, 559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R., Fisher, S. G., Grimm, N. B., & Kitchell, J. F. (1992). Global change and freshwater ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecological System, 23, 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, E. H. (1982). Large lakes of the world. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 8, 379–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, W. T., & Ho, Y. S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics, 73, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, K. Y., Huang, Y. L., & Ho, Y. S. (2007). A bibliometric and citation analysis of stroke-related research in Taiwan. Scientometrics, 72, 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eugene, G. (1990). KeyWords Plus: ISI’s breakthrough retrieval method. Part 1. Expanding your searching power on current contents on diskette. Current Comments, 32, 295–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eugene, A. S., & Oh, I. H. (2004). Aquatic ecosystem assessment using exergy. Ecological Indicators, 4, 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregerio, G. A., Rafael, A. B., Carolina, N. M., & Juan Carlos, V. Z. (2008). Coauthorship networks and institutional collaboration patterns in reproductive biology. Fertility Sterility, 90, 941–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffitth, M. B., Hill, B. H., & McCormick, F. H. (2005). Comparative application of indices of biotic integrity based on periphyton, macroinvertebrates, and fish to southern Rocky Mountain streams. Ecological Indicators, 5, 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E. (1866). Generelle morphologie der organismen. Berlin: Verlag von Georg Reimer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. H., & Silveira, R. (1999). Large-scale assessments of river health using an Index of Biotic Integrity with low-diversity fish communities. Freshwater Biology, 41, 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y. S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of adsorption technology in environmental science. Journal of Environmental Protection Science, 1, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, H. M., Zhao, J. Z., Ji, L. Z., Lu, Z., Deng, H. B., Ma, K. M., et al. (2002). Assessment method of ecosystem health. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 13, 486–490. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulasegarah, J., & Fenton, J. E. (2010). Comparison of the h-index with standard bibliometric indicators to rank influential otolaryngologists in Europe and North America. European Archives Otorhinolaryngology, 267, 455–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. L., Ding, G. H., Feng, N., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2009a). Global stem cell research trend: Bibliometric analysis as a tool for mapping of trends from 1991 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80, 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. F., Zhang, Y. H., Wang, X. S., & Ho, Y. S. (2009b). Bibliometric analysis of atmospheric simulation trends in meteorology and atmospheric science journals. Croatica Chemica Acta, 82, 695–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunetta, R. S., Shao, Y., Ediriwickrema, J., & Lyon, J. G. (2010). Monitoring agricultural cropping patterns across the Laurentian Great Lakes Basin using MODIS–NDVI data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 12, 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, K. M., Kong, H. M., Guan, W. B., & Fu, B. J. (2001). Ecosystem health assessment: Methods and directions. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 21, 2107–2116. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnuson, J. J., Webster, K. E., Assel, R. A., Bowser, C. J., Dillon, P. J., Eaton, J. G., et al. (1997). Potential effects of climate changes on aquatic systems: Laurentian great lakes and precambrian shield region. Hydrological Processes, 11, 825–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J., Johnston, C. A., & Kelley, J. C. (1988). Alteration of North American streams by beaver. BioScience, 38, 753–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NASA. (2011). Global climate change, http://climate.nasa.gov/warming_world. Accessed 29 Jan 2013.

  • Osca, L. J. (2005). Some considerations on the use of the impact factor of scientific journals as a tool to evaluate research in psychology. Scientometrics, 65, 189–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. S. (2003). Planktic community assembly in flowing water and the ecosystem health of rivers. Ecological Modelling, 160, 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubec, C. D. A., & Hanson, A. R. (2009). Wetland mitigation and compensation: Canadian experience Wetlands. Ecological Management, 17, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvera, M. P., Baptista, D. F., Buss, D. F., Nessimian, J. L., & Egler, M. (2005). Application of biological measures for stream integrity assessment in south–east Brazil. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 101, 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B. (1991). The potential impacts of climate change on the Great Lakes. Bulletin of the America Meteorological Society, 72, 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J., & Smol, J. P. (2003). Use of algae in environmental assessments. In J. D. Wehr & R. G. Sheath (Eds.), Freshwater algae of North America: Classification and ecology (pp. 775–804). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis Measurement. Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3, 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, S. D., Zhang, J., & Ho, Y. S. (2008). Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 77, 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, I. B., Kong, D. S., & Ryu, J. K. (1992). Studies on the biological evaluation of water quality by benthic macroinvertibrates—saprobic valency and indicative value. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology, 10, 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinyowera, M. C., & Moss, R. H. (Eds.). (1995). Climate change 1995: Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: Scientific ® -technical analyses, contribution of working group II to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (p. 880). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingqiu Liao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liao, J., Huang, Y. Global trend in aquatic ecosystem research from 1992 to 2011. Scientometrics 98, 1203–1219 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1071-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1071-z

Keywords

Navigation