Abstract
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), which is divided into three subfields, including Chinese medicine, Chinese herb and acupuncture, attracts increasing attentions due to its challenging and significant medical values. This study employs bibliometric analysis to examine the profile of publication activity in TCM field as well as its subfields. The data are retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded database during 1980–2009, and 16,536 papers are identified for analysis. Generally speaking, proportions of papers in subfield of acupuncture decreased dramatically, while the proportions of papers of Chinese medicine and Chinese herb rose increasingly. This study finds that East Asia has the largest number of TCM papers, followed by North America and Europe. Furthermore, while China is ranked first in terms of the amount of TCM publications, USA gains the highest percentage of citations. As for regional specialty, mainly, scholars in East Asia publish intensively in Chinese medicine, while most of the scholars in North America and Europe probe into the study of acupuncture. In the latest two decades, China took the first place over Japan in subfields of both Chinese medicine and Chinese herb, while the US has always kept the largest share in acupuncture with a marked upward trend. Regarding the top-ranked TCM institution, Chinese Academy of Sciences located in China, is ranked first in the subfields of Chinese medicine and Chinese herb as well. As for Kyung Hee University, which is located in South Korea, is ranked first in the number of acupuncture papers and Harvard University is ranked first in number of acupuncture citations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chan, K. (2003). Some aspects of toxic contaminants in herbal medicines. Chemosphere, 52(9), 1361–1371.
Chan, K. (2005). Chinese medicinal materials and their interface with Western medical concepts. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 96(1–2), 1–18.
Drasar, P., & Moravcova, J. (2004). Recent advances in analysis of Chinese medical plants and traditional medicines. Journal of Chromatography B—Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, 812(1–2), 3–21.
Ernst, E. (2006). Methodological aspects of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 35(11), 773–774.
Estabrooks, C. A., Winther, C., & Derksen, L. (2004). A bibliometric analysis of the research utilization literature in nursing. Nursing Research, 53(5), 293–303.
Food and Drug Administration. (2006). Guidance for industry on complementary and alternative medicine produces and their regulation by the food and drug administration. Retrieved May 5, 2011, from http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/06d-0480-gld0001.pdf.
Fu, J. Y. (2010). A bibliometric overview of Traditional Chinese Medicine research in Medline. Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 8(4), 379–384 (in Chinese).
Harvey, A. L. (2008). Natural products in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 13(19–20), 894–901.
Haustein, S., Tunger, D., Heinrichs, G., & Baelz, G. (2011). Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia-Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view? Scientometrics, 86(3), 727–746.
Hesketh, T., & Zhu, W. X. (1997). Health in China—Traditional Chinese medicine: One country, two systems. British Medical Journal, 315(7100), 115–117.
Jiang, W. Y. (2005). Therapeutic wisdom in traditional Chinese medicine: A perspective from modern science. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 26(11), 558–563.
Katsouyanni, K. (2008). Collaborative research: Accomplishments & potential. Environmental Health, 7, 3.
Kong, D. X., Li, X. J., & Zhang, H. Y. (2009). Where is the hope for drug discovery? Let history tell the future. Drug Discovery Today, 14(3–4), 115–119.
Leung, P. C. (2006). A practical way of research in Chinese medicine. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 35(11), 770–772.
Lissoni, F., Mairesse, J., Montobbio, F., & Pezzoni, M. (2011). Scientific productivity and academic promotion: A study on French and Italian physicists. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(1), 253–294.
Litscher, G. (2009). Ten years evidence-based high-tech acupuncture—a short review of centrally measured effects (Part II). Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 6(3), 305–314.
National People’s Congress. (2004). Constitution of People’s Republic of China (in Chinese). Retrieved May 5, 2011, from http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2004/content_62714.htm.
O’Brien, K. A., & Birch, S. (2009). A review of the reliability of traditional East Asian medicine diagnoses. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(4), 353–366.
Patwardhan, B., Warude, D., Pushpangadan, P., & Bhatt, N. (2005). Ayurveda and Traditional Chinese Medicine: A comparative overview. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2(4), 465–473.
Rojas-Sola, J. I., Jorda-Albinana, B., & Criado-Herrero, E. (2009). Bibliometric analysis of Latin American, Spanish and Portuguese scientific publications in the subject materials science, ceramics in JCR (SCI) database (1997–2008). Boletin De La Sociedad Espanola De Ceramica Y Vidrio, 48(6), 297–310.
State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. (2010a). Number of national higher TCM colleges in 2009 (in Chinese). Retrieved May 5, 2011, from http://www.satcm.gov.cn/1999-2011/atog/2009/C01.htm.
State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. (2010b). Status of outpatient services in TCM hospitals in 2009 (in Chinese). Retrieved May 5, 2011, from http://www.satcm.gov.cn/1999-2011/atog/2009/B01.htm.
Wang, J. F., Wei, D. Q., & Chou, K. C. (2008). Drug candidates from Traditional Chinese Medicines. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 8(18), 1656–1665.
Yarime, M., Takeda, Y., & Kajikawa, Y. (2010). Towards institutional analysis of sustainability science: A quantitative examination of the patterns of research collaboration. Sustainability Science, 5(1), 115–125.
Yu, R., Takahashi, T., Moriya, J., Kawaura, K., Yamakawa, J., Kusaka, K., et al. (2006). Traditional Chinese Medicine and Kampo: A review from the distant past for the future. Journal of International Medical Research, 34(3), 231–239.
Yuan, R., & Lin, Y. (2000). Traditional Chinese Medicine: An approach to scientific proof and clinical validation. Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 86(2), 191–198.
Zhang, H. Q. (1994). A bibliometric study on medicine Chinese traditional in Medline database. Scientometrics, 31(3), 241–250.
Zhang, G. G., Bausell, B., Lao, L. X., Handwerger, B., & Berman, B. M. (2003). Assessing the consistency of traditional Chinese medical diagnosis: An integrative approach. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 9(1), 66–71.
Zhong, Y. Q., Fu, J. J., Liu, X. M., Diao, X., Mao, B., Fan, T., et al. (2010). The reporting quality, scientific rigor, and ethics of randomized placebo-controlled trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine compound formulations and the differences between Chinese and Non-Chinese trials. Current Therapeutic Research-Clinical and Experimental, 71(1), 30–49.
Zuskin, E., Lipozencic, J., Pucarin-Cvetkovic, J., Mustajbegovic, J., Schachter, N., Mucic-Pucic, B., et al. (2008). Ancient medicine—a review. Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica, 16(3), 149–157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fu, JY., Zhang, X., Zhao, YH. et al. Global performance of traditional Chinese medicine over three decades. Scientometrics 90, 945–958 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0521-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0521-8