Skip to main content
Log in

Global performance of traditional Chinese medicine over three decades

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), which is divided into three subfields, including Chinese medicine, Chinese herb and acupuncture, attracts increasing attentions due to its challenging and significant medical values. This study employs bibliometric analysis to examine the profile of publication activity in TCM field as well as its subfields. The data are retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded database during 1980–2009, and 16,536 papers are identified for analysis. Generally speaking, proportions of papers in subfield of acupuncture decreased dramatically, while the proportions of papers of Chinese medicine and Chinese herb rose increasingly. This study finds that East Asia has the largest number of TCM papers, followed by North America and Europe. Furthermore, while China is ranked first in terms of the amount of TCM publications, USA gains the highest percentage of citations. As for regional specialty, mainly, scholars in East Asia publish intensively in Chinese medicine, while most of the scholars in North America and Europe probe into the study of acupuncture. In the latest two decades, China took the first place over Japan in subfields of both Chinese medicine and Chinese herb, while the US has always kept the largest share in acupuncture with a marked upward trend. Regarding the top-ranked TCM institution, Chinese Academy of Sciences located in China, is ranked first in the subfields of Chinese medicine and Chinese herb as well. As for Kyung Hee University, which is located in South Korea, is ranked first in the number of acupuncture papers and Harvard University is ranked first in number of acupuncture citations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chan, K. (2003). Some aspects of toxic contaminants in herbal medicines. Chemosphere, 52(9), 1361–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. (2005). Chinese medicinal materials and their interface with Western medical concepts. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 96(1–2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drasar, P., & Moravcova, J. (2004). Recent advances in analysis of Chinese medical plants and traditional medicines. Journal of Chromatography B—Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, 812(1–2), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, E. (2006). Methodological aspects of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 35(11), 773–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estabrooks, C. A., Winther, C., & Derksen, L. (2004). A bibliometric analysis of the research utilization literature in nursing. Nursing Research, 53(5), 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Drug Administration. (2006). Guidance for industry on complementary and alternative medicine produces and their regulation by the food and drug administration. Retrieved May 5, 2011, from http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/06d-0480-gld0001.pdf.

  • Fu, J. Y. (2010). A bibliometric overview of Traditional Chinese Medicine research in Medline. Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 8(4), 379–384 (in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A. L. (2008). Natural products in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 13(19–20), 894–901.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haustein, S., Tunger, D., Heinrichs, G., & Baelz, G. (2011). Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia-Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view? Scientometrics, 86(3), 727–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesketh, T., & Zhu, W. X. (1997). Health in China—Traditional Chinese medicine: One country, two systems. British Medical Journal, 315(7100), 115–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, W. Y. (2005). Therapeutic wisdom in traditional Chinese medicine: A perspective from modern science. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 26(11), 558–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsouyanni, K. (2008). Collaborative research: Accomplishments & potential. Environmental Health, 7, 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, D. X., Li, X. J., & Zhang, H. Y. (2009). Where is the hope for drug discovery? Let history tell the future. Drug Discovery Today, 14(3–4), 115–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, P. C. (2006). A practical way of research in Chinese medicine. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 35(11), 770–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissoni, F., Mairesse, J., Montobbio, F., & Pezzoni, M. (2011). Scientific productivity and academic promotion: A study on French and Italian physicists. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(1), 253–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litscher, G. (2009). Ten years evidence-based high-tech acupuncture—a short review of centrally measured effects (Part II). Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 6(3), 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National People’s Congress. (2004). Constitution of People’s Republic of China (in Chinese). Retrieved May 5, 2011, from http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2004/content_62714.htm.

  • O’Brien, K. A., & Birch, S. (2009). A review of the reliability of traditional East Asian medicine diagnoses. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(4), 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patwardhan, B., Warude, D., Pushpangadan, P., & Bhatt, N. (2005). Ayurveda and Traditional Chinese Medicine: A comparative overview. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2(4), 465–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas-Sola, J. I., Jorda-Albinana, B., & Criado-Herrero, E. (2009). Bibliometric analysis of Latin American, Spanish and Portuguese scientific publications in the subject materials science, ceramics in JCR (SCI) database (1997–2008). Boletin De La Sociedad Espanola De Ceramica Y Vidrio, 48(6), 297–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. (2010a). Number of national higher TCM colleges in 2009 (in Chinese). Retrieved May 5, 2011, from http://www.satcm.gov.cn/1999-2011/atog/2009/C01.htm.

  • State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. (2010b). Status of outpatient services in TCM hospitals in 2009 (in Chinese). Retrieved May 5, 2011, from http://www.satcm.gov.cn/1999-2011/atog/2009/B01.htm.

  • Wang, J. F., Wei, D. Q., & Chou, K. C. (2008). Drug candidates from Traditional Chinese Medicines. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 8(18), 1656–1665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarime, M., Takeda, Y., & Kajikawa, Y. (2010). Towards institutional analysis of sustainability science: A quantitative examination of the patterns of research collaboration. Sustainability Science, 5(1), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, R., Takahashi, T., Moriya, J., Kawaura, K., Yamakawa, J., Kusaka, K., et al. (2006). Traditional Chinese Medicine and Kampo: A review from the distant past for the future. Journal of International Medical Research, 34(3), 231–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, R., & Lin, Y. (2000). Traditional Chinese Medicine: An approach to scientific proof and clinical validation. Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 86(2), 191–198.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. Q. (1994). A bibliometric study on medicine Chinese traditional in Medline database. Scientometrics, 31(3), 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G. G., Bausell, B., Lao, L. X., Handwerger, B., & Berman, B. M. (2003). Assessing the consistency of traditional Chinese medical diagnosis: An integrative approach. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 9(1), 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, Y. Q., Fu, J. J., Liu, X. M., Diao, X., Mao, B., Fan, T., et al. (2010). The reporting quality, scientific rigor, and ethics of randomized placebo-controlled trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine compound formulations and the differences between Chinese and Non-Chinese trials. Current Therapeutic Research-Clinical and Experimental, 71(1), 30–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuskin, E., Lipozencic, J., Pucarin-Cvetkovic, J., Mustajbegovic, J., Schachter, N., Mucic-Pucic, B., et al. (2008). Ancient medicine—a review. Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica, 16(3), 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mu-Hsuan Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fu, JY., Zhang, X., Zhao, YH. et al. Global performance of traditional Chinese medicine over three decades. Scientometrics 90, 945–958 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0521-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0521-8

Keywords

Navigation