Skip to main content
Log in

Improving SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) subject classification through reference analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to re-categorize the SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) journals based on Scopus, as well as improve the SJR subject classification scheme, an iterative process built upon reference analysis of citing journals was designed. The first step entailed construction of a matrix containing citing journals and cited categories obtained through the aggregation of cited journals. Assuming that the most representative categories in each journal would be represented by the highest citation values regarding categories, the matrix vectors were reduced using a threshold to discern and discard the weakest relations. The process was refined on the basis of different parameters of a heuristic nature, including (1) the development of several tests applying different thresholds, (2) the designation of a cutoff, (3) the number of iterations to execute, and (4) a manual review operation of a certain amount of multi-categorized journals. Despite certain shortcomings related with journal classification, the method showed a solid performance in grouping journals at a level higher than categories—that is, aggregating journals into subject areas. It also enabled us to redesign the SJR classification scheme, providing for a more cohesive one that covers a good proportion of re-categorized journals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen, C. M. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. M. (2008). Classification of scientific networks using aggregated journal-journal citation relations in the Journal Citation Reports. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(14), 2296–2304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsevier. (2002). Scopus. http://www.scopus.com/home.url. Accessed June 20, 2011

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56(3), 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H. J. (1999a). An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in multidisciplinary and general journals using reference analysis. Scientometrics, 44(3), 427–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., Schoepflin, U., & Czerwon, H. J. (1999b). An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in journals covered by the SSCI database using reference analysis. Scientometrics, 46(3), 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, I., Bordons, M., Fernández, M. T., & Méndez, A. (1996). Coping with the problem of subject classification diversity. Scientometrics, 35(2), 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2002). Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 987–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Illescas, C., Noyons, E. C. M., Visser, M. V., Moya-Anegón, F., & Moed, H. F. (2009). Expansion of scientific journal categories using reference analysis: How can it be done and does it make a difference? Scientometrics, 79(3), 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity. Cherry Hill, NJ: Computer Horizons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Carpenter, M., & Nancy, C. (1972). Interrelationships of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23(5), 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Pinski, G., & Gee, H. H. (1976). Structure of the biomedical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(1), 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management, 12(5), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1996). Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 36(3), 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scimago Lab. (2007). Scimago Journal & Country Rank. http://www.scimagojr.com/. Accessed June 20, 2011

  • Small, H. (1999). A passage through science: Crossing disciplinary boundaries. Library Trends, 48(1), 72–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson Reuters. (2010). ISI Web of Science. http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/multidisciplinary/webofscience/. Accessed June 20, 2011.

  • Weinberg, A. (1963). Criteria for scientific choice. Minerva, 1(2), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Jean Sanders for editing the text.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio J. Gómez-Núñez.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Final categorization scheme

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gómez-Núñez, A.J., Vargas-Quesada, B., de Moya-Anegón, F. et al. Improving SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) subject classification through reference analysis. Scientometrics 89, 741–758 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0485-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0485-8

Keywords

Navigation