Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evolutionary dynamics of scientific collaboration networks: multi-levels and cross-time analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several studies exist which use scientific literature for comparing scientific activities (e.g., productivity, and collaboration). In this study, using co-authorship data over the last 40 years, we present the evolutionary dynamics of multi level (i.e., individual, institutional and national) collaboration networks for exploring the emergence of collaborations in the research field of “steel structures”. The collaboration network of scientists in the field has been analyzed using author affiliations extracted from Scopus between 1970 and 2009. We have studied collaboration distribution networks at the micro-, meso- and macro-levels for the 40 years. We compared and analyzed a number of properties of these networks (i.e., density, centrality measures, the giant component and clustering coefficient) for presenting a longitudinal analysis and statistical validation of the evolutionary dynamics of “steel structures” collaboration networks. At all levels, the scientific collaborations network structures were central considering the closeness centralization while betweenness and degree centralization were much lower. In general networks density, connectedness, centralization and clustering coefficient were highest in marco-level and decreasing as the network size grow to the lowest in micro-level. We also find that the average distance between countries about two and institutes five and for authors eight meaning that only about eight steps are necessary to get from one randomly chosen author to another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi, A., & Altmann, J. (2010). A social network system for analyzing publication activities of researchers. Symposium on collective intelligence (COLLIN 2010), Advances in intelligent and soft computing, Springer, Hagen, Germany.

  • Abbasi, A., & Altmann, J. (2011). On the correlation between research performance and social network analysis measures applied to research collaboration networks. In Proceedings of the 44th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Waikoloa, HI: IEEE. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.007

  • Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., & Hossain, L. (2011). Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. Journal of Informetrics.

  • Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., & Hwang, J. (2010). Evaluating scholars based on their academic collaboration activities: Two indices, the RC-index and the CC-index, for quantifying collaboration activities of researchers and scientific communities. Scientometrics, 83(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galán, J. L. (2006). Co authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311(3–4), 590–614.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, A. (1950). Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 725–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. (1995). Centrality and AIDS. Connections, 18(1), 112–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S., Everett, M., & Freeman, L. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis (version 6). Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1980). The gatekeeper, pair-dependency and structural centrality. Quality & Quantity, 14(4), 585–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, J. W. (2002). The evolution of the mathematical research collaboration graph. Congressus Numerantium, 158, 201–212.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y. (2008). Locating active actors in the scientific collaboration communities based on interaction topology analyses. Scientometrics, 74(3), 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Martin, B. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc, M., & Gagné, J. (1994). International scientific cooperation: The continentalization of science. Scientometrics, 31(3), 261–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(1), 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 16131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(1), 16132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001c). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 98(2), 404.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 101(Suppl 1), 5200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith, J., Riccaboni, M., Pammolli, F., & Powell, W. (2002). A comparison of US and European university-industry relations in the life sciences. Management Science, 48(1), 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabidussi, G. (1966). The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, 31(4), 581–603.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald, D. (2007). Scientific collaboration: A synthesis of challenges and strategies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 643–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suresh, V., Raghupathy, N., Shekar, B., & Madhavan, C. E. (2007). Discovering mentorship information from author collaboration networks. Discovery Science, 4755, 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Office of Science & Technology Policy (2000). Examples of international scientific collaboration and the benefits to society. Retrieved June 14, 2005 from http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/html/00426_7.html.

  • Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D., & Strogatz, S. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors appreciate the anonymous reviewers for their positive and useful comments on the early drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Complex Systems Research, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Alireza Abbasi, Liaquat Hossain & Shahadat Uddin

  2. School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Kim J. R. Rasmussen

Authors
  1. Alireza Abbasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liaquat Hossain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shahadat Uddin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kim J. R. Rasmussen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Abbasi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abbasi, A., Hossain, L., Uddin, S. et al. Evolutionary dynamics of scientific collaboration networks: multi-levels and cross-time analysis. Scientometrics 89, 687–710 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0463-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0463-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation