Skip to main content
Log in

Using detailed maps of science to identify potential collaborations

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on the effects of collaboration in scientific research has been increasing in recent years. A variety of studies have been done at the institution and country level, many with an eye toward policy implications. However, the question of how to identify the most fruitful targets for future collaboration in high-performing areas of science has not been addressed. This paper presents a method for identifying targets for future collaboration between two institutions. The utility of the method is shown in two different applications: identifying specific potential collaborations at the author level between two institutions, and generating an index that can be used for strategic planning purposes. Identification of these potential collaborations is based on finding authors that belong to the same small paper-level community (or cluster of papers), using a map of science and technology containing nearly 1 million papers organized into 117,435 communities. The map used here is also unique in that it is the first map to combine the ISI Proceedings database with the Science and Social Science Indexes at the paper level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Börner, K., Chen, C., Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37: 179–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyack, K. W., Börner, K., Klavans, R. (2007). Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research. Scientometrics, 79(1): 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3): 351–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B., Schubert, A., Thijs, B. (2006). Proceedings literature as additional data source for bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 68(3): 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2): 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havemann, F., Heinz, M., Kretschmer, H. (2006). Collaboration and distances between German immunological institutes — a trend analysis. Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration, 1: 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klavans, R., Boyack, K. W. (2006a). Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2): 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klavans, R., Boyack, K. W. (2006b). Quantitative evaluation of large maps of science. Scientometrics, 68(3): 475–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klavans, R., Boyack, K. W. (2008). Thought leadership: A new indicator for national and institutional comparison. Scientometrics, 75(2): 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, G., Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3): 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National_Science_Board. (2006). Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Arlington, VA. National Science Foundation (volume 1, NSB 06-01; volume 2, NSB 06-01A).

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 98(2): 404–409.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin W. Boyack.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyack, K.W. Using detailed maps of science to identify potential collaborations. Scientometrics 79, 27–44 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0402-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0402-6

Keywords

Navigation