Abstract
In this article we analyse how research on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) break through into one established scientific arena, namely academic journals. With help from bibliometric methods we analyse publication of CAM articles, in the Medline database, during the period 1966–2007. We also analyse the general content of the articles and in what journals they get published. We conclude that the publication activity of CAM articles increases rapidly, especially in the late 1990s, and that the changing growth rate is not due to the general expansion of Medline. The character of CAM articles has changed towards more clinical oriented research, especially in subfields such as acupuncture and musculoskeletal manipulations. CAM articles are found both in core clinical journals and in specialized CAM journals. Even though a substantial part of the articles are published in CAM journals, we conclude that the increasing publication activity is not restricted to the expansion of these specialized journals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Astin, J. A. (1998), Why patients use alternative medicine — Results of a national study, JAMA — Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(19): 1548–1553.
Brodin, J.-A. (2001), Religion till Salu? En sociologisk studie av New Age i Sverige. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Cant, S., Sharma, U. (1999), A New Medical Pluralism? Alternative Medicine, Doctors, Patients and the State. London: UCL Press.
Druss, B. G., Rosenheck, R. A. (1999), Association between use of unconventional therapies and conventional medical services, JAMA — Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(7): 651–656.
Easthope. G. (2003), Alternative, complementary, or integrative?, Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 11(1): 2–3.
Eisenberg, D. M. & al. (1993), Unconventional medicine in the united states — Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use, The New England Journal of Medicine, 328(4): 246–252.
Eisenberg, D. M. & al. (1998), Trends in alternative medicine use in the united states, 1990–1997, JAMA — Journal of the American Medical Association, 280: 1569–1575.
Eklöf, M. (Ed.), (2004), Perspektiv på komplementär medicin. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Ernst, E., White, A. (2000), The BBC survey of complementary medicine use in the UK, Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 8(1): 32–36.
Fisher, P., Ward, A. (1994), Complementary medicine in Europe, British Medical Journal, 309(6947): 107–111.
Gieryn, T. F. (1999), Cultural Boundaries of Science — Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gorski, T. (1996), Defining and assessing alternative medicine practices, JAMA — Journal of the American Medical Association, 276(3): 195–196.
Harris, P., Rees, R. (2000), The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population: a systematic review of the literature, Complementary Therapies in Medicine, (8): 88–96.
Hess, D. (1987), Religion, heterodox science and Brazilian culture, Social Studies of Science, 17(3): 465–477.
Hess, D. (2002), Complementary or alternative? Stronger vs weaker integration policies, American Journal of Public Health, 92(10): 1579–1581.
Hess, D. (1993), Science in the New Age — the Paranormal, Its defenders and Debunkers, and American Culture. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Hess, D. J. (1995), Science and Technology in a Multicultural World. New York: Columbia University Press.
Jütte, R. (2001), Alternative medicine and medico-historical semantics. In: Jütte, R., Eklöf, M., Nelson, M. C. (Ed.), (2001), Historical Aspects of Unconventional Medicine — Approaches, Concepts, Case Studies. Sheffield: European Association for the History of Medicine and Health Publications.
Jütte, R., Eklöf, M, Nelson, M. C. (Ed.) (2001), Historical Aspects of Unconventional Medicine — Approaches, Concepts, Case Studies. Sheffield: European Association for the History of Medicine and Health Publications.
Kelner, M. & & al. (2004), The role of the state in the social inclusion of complementary and alternative occupations, Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 12: 79–89.
MacLennan, A. H., Wilson, D. H., Taylor A. W. (1996), Prevalence and cost of alternative medicine in Australia, Lancet, 347(9001): 569–573.
Martin, S. C. (1994), The only truly scientific method of healing, chiropractic and american science, 1895–1990, Isis, 85: 207–227.
Mauskopf, S., McVaugh, M. (1980), The Elusive Science: Origins of Experimental Psychology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Millar, W. J. (1997), Use of alternative health care by Canadians, Canadian Journal of Public Health, 88(3): 154–158.
Salmon, J. W. (Ed.), (1984), Alternative Medicines —Popular and Policy Perspectives. New York: Tavistock Publications.
Star, S. L., Griesemer, J. R. (1989), Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1939, Social Studies of Science, 19: 387–420.
Worsley, P. (1982), Non-western medical systems, Annual Review of Anthropology, 11: 315–348.
Xue, C. C. L. & al. (2007), Complementary and alternative medicine use in Australia: A national population-based survey, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 13(6): 643–650.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Danell, JA.B., Danell, R. Publication activity in complementary and alternative medicine. Scientometrics 80, 539–551 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2078-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2078-8