Skip to main content
Log in

Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

For all rankings of countries research output based on number of publications or citations compared with population, GDP, R&D and public R&D expenses, and other national characteristics the counting method is decisive. Total counting (full credit to a country when at least one of the authors is from this country) and Fractional Counting (a country receives a fraction of full credit for a publication equal to the fraction of authors from this country) of publications give widely different results. Counting methods must be stated, rankings based on different counting methods cannot be compared, and Fractional Counting is to be preferred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gauffriau, M., Larsen, P. Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies. Scientometrics 64, 85–93 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0239-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0239-6

Keywords

Navigation