Summary
Felsenstein's (1985) method of phylogenetic independent contrasts is probably the most commonly used technique in evolutionary biology to study adaptation of organisms to their environment, taking phylogeny into account. Here, we performed a scientometric evaluation of all 1462 articles that cited Felsenstein (1985) between 1985 and 2002, in order to analyze the impact of his comparative method on the evolutionary research program and what has been done since it. We found that Felsentein's (1985) article can be classified as a “hot paper' or a breakthrough contribution, since it was the most cited article from <Emphasis Type=”Italic”>The American Naturalist</Emphasis> published in 1985. Also, it can be considered as a “citation classic', since it is the third more cited paper in <Emphasis Type=”Italic”>The American Naturalist</Emphasis> from 1945 to 2002. In general, papers that cited Felsenstein (1985) were published in high-impact journals, and most of them are theoretical articles indicating that biologists are aware of statistical and conceptual problems in dealing with comparative methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prpić, K. Generational similarities and differences in researchers' professional ethics: An empirical comparison. Scientometrics 62, 27–51 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0002-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0002-z