Skip to main content
Log in

Entrepreneurial universities: emerging models in the new social and economic landscape

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper and the special issue is to improve our understanding of the theoretical, empirical, managerial and political implications of emerging models of entrepreneurial universities in the new social and economic landscape. We accomplish this objective by examining the role of entrepreneurial universities as drivers of innovation and entrepreneurship activities. Our analysis starts with an overview by outlining an overarching framework. This allows us to highlight the contributions made in this special issue within the framework. We conclude by outlining an agenda for future research and discuss implications for university managers, policy makers, and other academic agents involved in the development of entrepreneurial/innovation ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Specially, USA and Europe experimented the strong effects of this economic transition (Van Der Zwan et al. 2013; Charles et al. 2014).

  2. During the period of December 2014 to April 2016, these papers were selected from 45 proposal received from researchers located across the world. The final selection was based on double reviews.

  3. In order to boost innovation and to promote entrepreneurship, public policy has also actively supported the ‘mission-oriented’ countries like the UK and USA (Brown and Mason 2014).

  4. For further information, please visit http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/knowledge_society/index_en.htm.

References

  • Abreu, M., Demirel, P., Grinevich, V., & Karatas-Ozkan, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial practices in research-intensive and teaching-led universities. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9754-5.

  • Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2007). The entrepreneurial society. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies, 38(8), 949–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. (2004). A model of the entrepreneurial economy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 2(2), 143–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienkowska, D., & Klofsten, M. (2012). Creating entrepreneurial networks: Academic entrepreneurship, mobility and collaboration during PhD education. Higher Education, 64(2), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienkowska, D., Klofsten, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2016). PhD students in the entrepreneurial university-perceived support for academic entrepreneurship. European Journal of Education, 51(1), 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2014). Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy. Technovation, 34(12), 773–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W., Plummer, L. A., Klotz, A. C., Shahzad, A., & Rhoads, K. (2014). Entrepreneurship research (1985–2009) and the emergence of opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 981–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellacci, F., & Natera, J. M. (2013). The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 42(3), 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, D., Kitagawa, F., & Uyarra, E. (2014). Universities in crisis?—new challenges and strategies in two English city-regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2), 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (2001). The entrepreneurial university: New foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Higher Education Management, 13(2), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4), 475–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corona, L., Doutriaux, J., & Mian, S. (2006). Building knowledge regions in North America: Emerging technology innovation poles. Elgar: Edward.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J. A., & Link, A. N. (2015). Fostering university-industry R&D collaborations in European Union countries. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 849–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ejermo, O., & Källström, J. (2016). What is the causal effect of R&D on patenting activity in a “Professor’s Privilege” country? Evidence from Sweden. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9752-7.

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle, A. (2007). Entrepreneurship and new value creation: The dynamic of the entrepreneurial process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2009). Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: An assessment of Italian founders’ incentives. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(4), 380–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gianiodis, P. T., Markman, G. D., Panagopoulos, A. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities and overt opportunism. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9753-6.

  • Gibb, A., & Hannon, P. (2006). Towards the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 4(1), 73–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 43–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2014). Academics’ start-up intentions and knowledge filters: An individual perspective of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A., & Urbano, D. (2015). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3), 748–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: Evidence from European entrepreneurial universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 105–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, C. (2016). A trajectory of early-stage spin-offs success: The role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9756-3.

  • Herrmann, B., Marmer, M., Dogrultan, E. y Holtschke, D. (2012). Start-up Ecosystem Report 2012. Part One. Start-up Genome’s Start-up Compass sponsored by Telefónica. Obtenida el 9 de enero de 2013, de http://reports.startupcompass.co/

  • Huggins, R., & Kitagawa, F. (2012). Regional policy and university knowledge transfer: Perspectives from devolved regions in the UK. Regional Studies, 46(6), 817–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Piva, E., & Wright, M. (2016). Are researchers deliberately bypassing the technology transfer office? An analysis of TTO awareness. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9757-2

  • Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M., & Goe, R. W. (2004). The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: A comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford. Research Policy, 33(5), 691–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, D. A., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2011). Making universities more entrepreneurial: Development of a model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 28(3), 302–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe—The case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14(4), 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of studies in international education, 8(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (2015). International universities misunderstandings and emerging models? Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(2), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R, Jr. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Paper prepared for a workshop of the OECD LEED programme and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague, Netherlands, 7th November 2013.

  • McMullen, J. S., & Dimov, D. (2013). Time and the entrepreneurial journey: The problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a process. Journal of Management Studies, 50(8), 1481–1512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S. A. (2011). University’s involvement in technology business incubation: What theory and practice tell us? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 13(2), 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S., Fayolle, A., & Lamine, W. (2012). Building sustainable regional platforms for incubating science and technology businesses Evidence from US and French science and technology parks. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 13(4), 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K., McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2014). The changing university business model: A stakeholder perspective. R&D Management, 44(3), 265–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minola, T., Domina, D., Meoli, M. (2016). Students climbing the entrepreneurial ladder: Does university internationalization pay off? Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9758-1.

  • Mustar, P., & Wright, M. (2010). Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 42–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spin-off performance of US universities. Research Policy, 34, 994–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. C. (2011). Intrapreneurship or entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prodan, I., & Drnovsek, M. (2010). Conceptualizing academic-entrepreneurial intentions: An empirical test. Technovation, 30(5), 332–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E., & Borch, O. J. (2010). University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy, 39(5), 602–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, P., Klofsten, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2012). An entrepreneurial university strategy for renewing a declining industrial city: The Norrköping way. European Planning Studies, 20(4), 505–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial universities: Socio-economic impacts of academic entrepreneurship in a European region. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(1), 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Zwan, P., Verheul, I., Thurik, R., & Grilo, I. (2013). Entrepreneurial progress: Climbing the entrepreneurial ladder in Europe and the United States. Regional Studies, 47(5), 803–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Massachusetts, US: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., MacKenzie, N. G., Jon-Evans, D., and Huggins, R. (2016). Leveraging knowledge as a competitive asset? The intensity, performance and structure of universities’ entrepreneurial knowledge exchange activities at a regional level. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9759-0.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editors of the Special Issue acknowledge the support provided by David Audretsch, Editor-in-Chief, Small Business Economics. We also appreciate the time and hard work of many colleagues who volunteered to review the manuscripts and offered valuable advice to the authors (confidentiality rules do not permit to list their names).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maribel Guerrero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Fayolle, A. et al. Entrepreneurial universities: emerging models in the new social and economic landscape. Small Bus Econ 47, 551–563 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9755-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9755-4

Keywords

Navigation