Skip to main content
Log in

Born local: toward a theory of new venture’s choice of internationalization

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This manuscript offers a theory regarding two distinct avenues to new venture internationalization: a direct path described in much of the extant literature and an intermediated one in which new ventures and multinational firms create symbiotic relationships in order to expand internationally. The term “born local”, as opposed to “born global”, describes how new ventures are created from knowledge spillovers and other resources in a geographically bounded environment. The theory suggests that the greater the number of value chain activities and the greater the number of countries involved, the more likely that the new venture will pursue the intermediated mode of internationalization. We suggest that new ventures frequently specialize and use existing MNEs as conduits for international expansion; however the greater the perceived ex-post costs of protecting intellectual property, transaction costs, and extraction costs related to hold-up, agency, and monopoly rents, the more likely the new venture will pursue a direct mode of internationalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78(4), 678–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2009). A knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Morck, R., Shaver, J. M., & Yeung, B. (1997). Small and medium sized enterprises in the global economy: A policy perspective. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E. (2007). GEM global report on high-growth entrepreneurship. Babson Park, MA\London, UK: Babson College\London Business School and Mazars.

  • Autio, E., & Acs, Z. J. (2010). Intellectual property protection and the formation of entrepreneurial growth aspirations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(3), 234–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balabanis, G. I. (2000). Factors affecting export intermediaries’ service offerings: The British example. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (2004). Entrepreneurial enterprises, large established firms and other components of the free-market growth machine. Small Business Economics, 23(1), 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., & Jonsson, S. (1998). Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgel, O., & Murray, G. C. (2000). The international market entry choices of start-up companies in high technology industries. Journal of International Marketing, 8(2), 33–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. F. (2005). Extending internalization theory: A new perspective on international technology transfer and its generation. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 231–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, W., Mitchell, W., & Yeung, B. (2003). Foreign direct investment and host country productivity: The American automotive component industry in the 1980s. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. (1999). Reconfiguring the boundaries of international business activity. In Z. Acs & B. Yeung (Eds.), Small and medium-sized enterprises in the global economy (pp. 24–44). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist. (2005). An open secret: Sharing intellectual property can be more profitable than keeping it to yourself. October 20. p. 16. Available at http://www.economist.com/node/5015177.

  • Evans, W., Lane, H., & O’Grady, S. (1991). Border crossings: Doing business in the U.S.. Scarborough, ON: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (2001). Theories of the multinational enterprise. In A. Rugman & T. Brewer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of international business (pp. 127–150). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hessels, J., & Terjesen, S. (2010). Resource dependency and institutional theory perspectives on direct and indirect export choices. Small Business Economics, 34(2), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. (1976). The international operations of national firms. PhD Thesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Keupp, M. M., & Gassmann, O. (2009). The past and future of international entrepreneurship: A review and suggestions for developing the field. Journal of Management, 35(3), 600–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle, W. (2002). Home base and knowledge management in international ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 99–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle, W. (2005). The entrepreneur’s path to global expansion. Sloan Management Review, 46(2), 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1968). Entrepreneurship and development. American Economic Review, 58(2), 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. (2004). Research note: The internet’s impact on export channel structure. Thunderbird International Business Review, 46(4), 443–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (1995). The future of foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada. In R. Daniels & R. Morck (Eds.), Corporate decision making and governance in Canada, Industry Canada. Calgary: Canadian Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachum, L., & Wymbs, C. (2007). The location and performance of foreign affiliates in global cities. In Rugman, A. M. (Ed.) Regional aspects of multinationality and performance. Research in global strategic management (Vol. 13, pp. 221–257). Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1997). Challenges for internationalization process theory: The case for international new ventures. Management International Review, 2(1), 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Illinitch, A. Y. (1998). Export intermediary firms: A note on export development research. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & York, A. S. (2001). Behind intermediary performance in export trade: Transactions, agents and resources. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), 327–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, L., & Acs, Z. J. (2012). Localized competition in the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Working Paper.

  • Prashantham, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Dancing with gorillas: How small companies can partner effectively with MNCs. California Management Review, 51(1), 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quian, H., & Acs, Z. J. (2011). An absorptive capacity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9368-x.

  • Quian, H., Acs, Z. J., & Stough, R. R. (2012). Regional systems of entrepreneurship: The nexus of human capital, knowledge, and new firm formation. Journal of Economic Geography. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs009.

  • Rialp, A., Rialp, R., Urbano, D., & Vaillant, Y. (2005). The born-global phenomenon: A comparative case study research. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 133–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise: Internalization and strategic management perspectives. Journal of International Business, 34(1), 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A., & Verbeke, A. (2004). A perspective on regional and global strategies on multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A., & Verbeke, A. (2007). Liabilities of regional foreignness and the use of firm-level versus country-level data: A response to Dunning et al. (2007). Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), 200–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A., & Verbeke, A. (2008). The theory and practice of regional strategy: A response to Osegowitsch and Sammartino. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 325–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. (1965). Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. American Economic Review, 55(5), 1097–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). The theory of economic development. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Journal, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M., Orser, B., & Riding, A. (2011). A comparative study of international and domestic new ventures. Management International Review, 51(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J. & Wuebker, R. (2011). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.002.

  • Terjesen, S., & Elam, A. B. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurs’ venture internationalization strategies: A practice theory approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1093–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, S., O’Gorman, C., & Acs, Z. (2008). Intermediated internationalization: Evidence from the software industry in Ireland and India. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 20(1), 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and anti-trust implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. (2005). A theory of international new ventures: A decade of research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1), 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siri Terjesen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acs, Z.J., Terjesen, S. Born local: toward a theory of new venture’s choice of internationalization. Small Bus Econ 41, 521–535 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9446-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9446-8

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation