Abstract
The paper examines the determinants of the creation of high tech SMEs at a regional level. Relations between the scientific and technical profile of a region, the size of the local market for biotech products and services, and economic development are explored in the French biotech industry during the 1990’s. Empirical analysis shows that a high level of scientific activity within a region is necessary to sustain a continuous flow of new business creation. The likelihood of firm creation depends on scientific and technological organizational factors like cooperation between academic and private organizations. Regional policies can have positive impact on firm creation, especially by promoting diversity and excellence in science. However, contrasting with the U.S. results, the size of the local market for biotech products and services matters in the industry development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Z. Acs L. Preston (1997) ArticleTitle‘Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Technology, and Globalization: Introduction to a Special Issue on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Global Economy’ Small Business Economics 9 1–6
A. Afuah J. M. Utterback (1997) ArticleTitle‘Responding to Structural Industry Changes: A Technological Evolution Perspective’ Industrial and Corporate Change 6 IssueID1 183–202
P. Almeida B. Kogut (1999) ArticleTitle‘Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks’ Management Science 45 IssueID7 905–918
L. Anselin A. Varga Z. Acs (1997) ArticleTitle‘Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations’ Journal of Urban Economics 42 422–448 Occurrence Handle10.1006/juec.1997.2032
A. Arora A. Gambardella (1994a) ArticleTitle‘Evaluating Technological Information and Utilizing It: Scientific Knowledge, Technological Capability, and External Linkages in Biotechnology’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 24 IssueID1 91–114 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0167-2681(94)90055-8
A. Arora A. Gambardella (1994b) ArticleTitle‘The Changing Technology of Technological Change: General and Abstract Knowledge and the Division of Innovative Labour’ Research Policy 23 523–532 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0048-7333(94)01003-X
D. Audretsch M. Feldman (1996a) ArticleTitle‘Knowledge Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production’ American Economic Review 86 IssueID3 630–640
D. Audretsch M. Feldman (1996) ArticleTitle‘R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production’ American Economic Review 86 IssueID3 630–640
D. Audretsch P. Stephan (1996) ArticleTitle‘Company Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology’ American Economic Review 86 IssueID3 641–652
C. Autant-Bernard (2001) ArticleTitle‘Science and Knowledge Flows: Evidence from the French Case’ Research Policy 20 1069–1078
C. Autant-Bernard V. Mangematin N. Massard (2002) ‘Biotech Maturing Sector, Specialization of Regions and Development of Biotech Smes,’ M. McKelvey (Eds) The Economics and Business of Bio-Sciences & Bio-Technologies: What can be Learnt from the Nordic Countries and the UK? Gothenburg Sweden
Autant-Bernard, C. and N. Massard, 1999, ‘Econométrie Des Externalités Technologiques Et Géographie De L’innovation: Une Analyse Critique’, Economie Appliquée 4
L. Busenitz C. Gomez J. W. Spencer (2000) ArticleTitle‘Country Institutional Profiles: Unlocking Entrepreneurial Phenomenon’ Academy of Management Journal 43 IssueID5 994–1003
D. Catherine C. Corolleur M. Carrere V. Mangematin (2004) ArticleTitle‘Turning Scientific and Technological Human Capital into Economic Capital: The Experience of Biotech Start-Ups in France’ Research Policy 33 IssueID4 631–642
I.M. Cockburn R.M. Henderson (1998) ArticleTitle‘Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organisation of Research in Drug Discovery’ The Journal of Industrial Economics XLVI IssueID2 157–182
W. M. Cohen D. A. Levinthal (1990) ArticleTitle‘Absorptive Capacity, a New Perspective of Learning and Innovation’ Administrative Science Quarterly 35 128–152
P. Cooke (2002) ‘Rational Drug Design, the Knowledge Value Chain and Bioscience Megacentres’ J. Niosi (Eds) Clusters in High-Technology UQAM Montreal
C. Edquist (Eds) (1997) Systems of Innovation Pinter Publishers London
M. Feldman (1994a) The Geography of Innovation Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston
Feldman, M. (1994b) ‘Regional Innovative Capacity,’ The Geography of Innovation.Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 77–91
M. Feldman C. Ronzio (2001) ArticleTitle‘Closing the Innovative Loop: Moving from the Laboratory to the Shop Floor in Biotechnology Manufacturing’ Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 13 1–16
M. P. Feldman D. Audretsch (1999) ArticleTitle‘Innovation in Cities: Science-Based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition’ European Economic Review 43 409–429 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6
T. S. Frost (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Geographic Sources of Foriegn Subsidiaries’ Innovations’ Strategic Management Journal 22 IssueID2 101–123 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<101::AID-SMJ155>3.0.CO;2-G
M. Gittelman B. Kogut (2003) ArticleTitle‘Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns’ Management Science 49 IssueID4 366–382 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.49.4.366.14420
Adam B. Jaffe M. Trajtenberg R. Henderson (1993) ArticleTitle‘Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 IssueID3 57–598
Krugman, P., 1991, ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Geography’, Journal of Political Economy 99(3).
Krugman, P. and A. J. Venables, 1995, ‘Globalization and the Inequality of Nations’, Quaterly Journal of Economics, 110.
C. Largeon N. Massard (2001) ArticleTitle‘La Géographie Des Collaborations Scientifiques En France: Une Étude De La Structure Des Co-Publications Entre Départements Français’ Revue d’Economie Regionale et Urbaine 1 39–52
J. P. Liebeskind A. L. Oliver L. Zucker M. Brewer (1996) ArticleTitle‘Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms’ Organization Science 7 IssueID4 428–442
V. Mangematin N. Mandran (2001) ‘Innovation without Internal Research: Spillovers from Public Research or from Other Firms? The Case of the Agro-Food Industry,’ A. Kleinecht P. Mohnen (Eds) Innovation and Firm Performance. Econometric Explorations of Survey Data Palgrave London and Basingstoke
V. Mangematin S. Lemarie J. P. Boissin D. Catherine F. Corolleur R. Coronini M. Trommetter (2003) ArticleTitle‘Sectoral System of Innovation, Smes Development and Heterogeneity of Trajectories’ Research Policy 32 IssueID4 621–638 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00045-8
V. Mangematin L. Nesta (1999) ArticleTitle‘What Kind of Knowledge Can a Firm Absorb?’ International Journal of Technology Management 37 IssueID3–4 149–172
P. Martin G. I. P. Ottaviano (1999) ArticleTitle‘Growing Locations: Industry Location in a Model of Endogenous Growth’ European Economic Review 43 281–302 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00031-2
Massard, N. and S. Riou, 2001, ‘Specialization and Diversity: The Debate on the Nature of Innovative Agglomerations’, Third Congress on Proximity, New Growth and Territories. Paris
Nesta, L. 2001, ‘Cohérence Des Bases De Connaissances Et Changement Technique: Une Analyse Des Firmes De Biotechnologie De 1981 À 1997’, Department of Economics. Grenoble: Université Pierre Mendes France
J. Niosi M. Banik (2002) ‘The Evolution and Performance of Biotechnology Regional System of Innovation’ J. Niosi (Eds) Workshop Clusters in High Techlogy Aerospace, Biotechnology and Software Cirst-UQAM Montréal
J. Owen-Smith M. Riccaboni F. Pammolli W. W. Powell (2002) ArticleTitle‘A Comparison of Us and European University-Industry Relations in the Life Sciences’ Management Science 48 IssueID1 24–43 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.48.1.24.14275
W. W. Powell K. W. Koput J. I. Bowie L. Smith-Doerr (2002) ArticleTitle‘A Spatial Clustering of Science and Capital: Accounting for Biotech Firm-Venture Capital Relationships’ Regional Studies 36 IssueID3 291–305 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00343400220122089
Reiss, Th., C., Enzing, V., Mangematin, J., Senker, J., Calvert, I., Dominguez Lacasa, S., Kern, P., Nesta, P. Patel, and A. van der Giessen, 2003, ‘Efficiency of Innovation Policies in High Technology Sectors in Europe–Epohite’, Brussels: EC
L. Steier R. Greenwood (2000) ArticleTitle‘Entrepreneuship and the Evolution of Angel Financial Networks’ Organization Studies 21 IssueID1 163–192
C. Steinle H. Schiele (2002) ArticleTitle‘When Do Industries Cluster? A Proposal of How to Assess an Industry’s Propensity to Concentrate at a Single Region or Nation’ Research Policy 31 IssueID6 849–858 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00151-2
L. Zucker M. Darby B. Brewer (1998) ArticleTitle‘Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of the US Biotechnology Enterprise’ American Economic Review 88 IssueID1 290–306
L. Zucker M. Darby M. Brewer Y. Peng (1996) ‘Collaboration Structure and Information Dilemmas in Biotechnology: Organisational Boundaries as Trust Production’ T. RaT Kramer (Eds) Trust in Organizations Sage Thousand Oaks, CA 90–113
L. G. Zucker M. R. Darby J. Armstrong (2002) ArticleTitle‘Commercializing Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Firm Performance in Biotechnology’ Management Science 48 IssueID1 138–153 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.48.1.138.14274
L. G. Zucker M. R. Darby J. Armstrong (1998) ArticleTitle‘Geographically Localized Knowledge: Spillovers or Markets?’ Economic Inquiry 36 IssueID1 65–86
Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby, and M. Torero, 1997, ‘Labor Mobility from Academe to Commerce’, NBER Working paper. n° 6050
L. G. Zucker M. R. Darby (2001) ArticleTitle‘Capturing Technological Opportunity Via Japan’s Star Scientists: Evidence from Japanese Firm’s Biotech Patent’s and Products’ The journal of Technology transfer 26 IssueID1/2 37–58 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1007832127813
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Autant-Bernard, C., Mangematin, V. & Massard, N. Creation of Biotech SMEs in France. Small Bus Econ 26, 173–187 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-004-3578-4
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-004-3578-4