Abstract
Two widespread assumptions concerning networks, including guanxi networks, are that they function in terms of trust relations and that their structure is dyadic. This article subjects both assumptions to critical assessment and proposes alternative formulations. When the distinctions between trust and trustworthiness and between trust and assurance are made, then broader understandings of guanxi relationships emerge. The article shows that the assurance mechanism of guanxi is public exposure of transgressions against network norms, leading to the transgressor’s loss of face (mianzi). The necessity of third-party intervention of this type, typically but not exclusively through gossip, indicates the triadic rather than dyadic structure of guanxi relationships when sanction of reputation is included in the conceptualization of guanxi. Changes in guanxi during economic transition in China, from strong-to weaker-tie associations, require careful consideration of the changing nature of the mechanisms of face-loss.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K. J. (1974). The limits of organization. New York: Norton.
Aspers, P. (2011). Markets. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Baker, H. D. R. (1979). Chinese family and kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
Barbalet, J. (2009). A characterization of trust, and its consequences. Theory and Society., 38(4), 367–382.
Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Bergmann, J. R. (1993). Discreet indiscretions: the social organization of gossip. New York: de Gruyter.
Bian, Y. (2001). Guanxi capital and social eating: Theoretical models and empirical analyses. In N. Lin, K. S. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: theory and research (pp. 275–295). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Bian, Y. (2006). Guanxi. In J. Beckert & M. Zafirovski (Eds.), International encyclopedia of economic sociology (pp. 312–314). New York: Routledge.
Boisot, M., & Child, J. (1996). From fiefs to clans and network capitalism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 600–628.
Boissevain, J. (1974). Friends of friends: networks, manipulators and coalitions. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Chan, C. S.-c. (2009). Invigorating the content in social embeddedness: an ethnography of life insurance transactions in China. American Journal of Sociology, 115(3), 712–754.
Chang, K.-C. (2011). A path to understanding guanxi in China’s transitional economy. Sociological Theory, 29(4), 315–339.
Chang, X. (2010). Guanxi or lishang wanglai? Reciprocity, social support networks and social creativity in a Chinese village. Taipei: Airiti Press.
Chen, X.-P., & Chen, C. C. (2004). On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A process model of guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21, 305–324.
Chen, I. C. L., & Easterby-Smith, M. (2008). Is guanxi still working, while Chinese MNCs go global? Human Systems Management, 27, 131–142.
Cheng, C.-y. (1986). The concept of face and its Confucian roots. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 13(3), 329–348.
Child, J., & Möllering, G. (2003). Contextual confidence and active trust development in the Chinese business environment. Organization Science, 14(1), 69–80.
Chua, R. Y. J., Morris, M. W., & Ingram, P. (2009). Guanxi vs networking: distinctive configurations of affect-and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs American mangers. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 490–508.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
DeGlopper, R. R. (1995). Lukang: commerce and industry in a Chinese city. Albany: SUNY Press.
Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.
Edelman, L. F., Bresnen, M., Newell, S., Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2004). The benefits and pitfalls of social capital: empirical evidence from two organizations in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Management, 15(S1), 59–69.
Eisenstadt, S. N., & Roniger, L. (1984). Patrons, clients and friends: interpersonal relations and the structure of trust in society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ermisch, J., & Gambetta, D. (2010). Do strong family ties inhibit trust? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 75(3), 365–376.
Farrer, J. (2002). “Idle talk”: neighborhood gossip as a medium of social communication in reform era Shanghai. In T. Gold, D. Guthrie, & D. Wank (Eds.), Social connections in China: institutions, culture, and the changing nature of guanxi (pp. 197–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fei, H. T.’u. (1962). Peasant life in China: a field study of country life in the Yangtze Valley. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Fei, X. (1992). From the soil: the foundations of Chinese society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Gabrenya, W. K., & Hwang, K.-k. (1996). Chinese social interaction: harmony and hierarchy on the good earth. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 309–321). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Gambetta, D. (1990). Can we trust trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 213–237). Oxford: Blackwell.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and economic structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy: lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guthrie, D. (1998). The declining significance of guanxi in China’s economic transition. The China Quarterly., 154, 254–282.
Guthrie, D. (1999). Dragon in a three-piece suit: the emergence of capitalism in China. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hamilton, G. G. (1990). Patriarchy, patrimonialism, and filial piety: a comparison of China and western Europe. British Journal of Sociology, 41(1), 77–104.
Hamilton, G. G., & Zheng, W. (1992). Introduction: Fei Xiaotong and the beginnings of a Chinese sociology. In X. Fei (Ed.), From the soil: the foundations of Chinese society (pp. 1–34). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hammond, S. C., & Glenn, L. M. (2004). The ancient practice of Chinese social networking: guanxi and social network theory. Emergence: Complexity and Organization., 6, 24–31.
Hardin, R. (1993). The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics and Society., 21(4), 505–529.
Hardin, R. (1996). Trustworthiness. Ethics, 107(1), 26–42.
Hechter, M. (1987). Principles of group solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Herold, D. K. (2008). Development of a civic cociety online? Internet vigilantism and state control in Chinese cyberspace. Asia Journal of Global Studies., 2(1), 26–37.
Ho, D. Y.-f. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 867–884.
Huff, L., & Kelley, L. (2003). Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: a seven-nation study. Organization Science, 14(1), 81–90.
Hwang, K.-k. (1987). Face and favor: the Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 944–974.
Kao, C.-s. (1996). “Personal trust” in the large businesses in Taiwan: a traditional foundation for contemporary economic activities. In G. G. Hamilton (Ed.), Asian business networks (pp. 61–70). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Kern, H. (1998). Lack of trust, surfeit of trust: some causes of the innovation crisis in German industry. In C. Lane & R. Bachmann (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations (pp. 203–213). New York: Oxford University Press.
King, A. Y.-c. (1991). Kuan-hsi and network building: a sociological interpretation. Daedalus, 120(2), 63–84.
Komter, A. E. (2005). Social solidarity and the gift. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, D. Y., & Dawes, P. L. (2005). Guanxi, trust, and long-term orientation in Chinese business markets. Journal of International Marketing, 13(2), 26–56.
Liebman, B. L., & Milhaupt, C. J. (2008). Reputational sanctions in China’s securities market. Columbia Law Review., 108, 929–983.
Lin, N. (2001a). Guanxi: a conceptual analysis. In A. Y. So, N. Lin, & D. Poston (Eds.), The Chinese triangle of mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong: comparative institutional analysis (pp. 153–166). Westport: Greenwood Press.
Lin, N. (2001b). Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, Y.-M. (2002). Beyond dyadic social effects: guanxi and third-party effects. In T. Gold, D. Guthrie, & D. Wank (Eds.), Social connections in China: institutions, culture, and the changing nature of guanxi (pp. 57–74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lovett, S., Simmons, L. C., & Kali, R. (1999). Guanxi versus the market. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 231–248.
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York: Wiley.
Lui, T.-l. (2001). A brief note on guanxi. In R. P. Appelbaum, W. L. F. Felstiner, & V. Gessner (Eds.), Rules and networks: the legal structure of global business networks (pp. 385–398). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Luo, J.-D., & Yeh, Y.-C. (2012). Neither collectivism nor individualism: trust in the Chinese guanxi circle. Journal of Trust Research., 2(1), 53–70.
Mencius. (2004). Mencius, translated with an Introduction and Notes by D.C. Lau. Revised edition. London: Penguin.
Molm, L., Takahashi, N., & Peterson, G. (2000). Risk and trust in social exchange: an experimental test of a classical proposition. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1396–1427.
Newton, K. (2001). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review., 22(2), 201–214.
Peng, Y. (2004). Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China’s transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology, 109(5), 1045–1074.
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 259–336.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Qi, X. (2013). Guanxi, social capital theory and beyond: toward a globalized social science. British Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 308–324.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.
Shapiro, S. (2012). The grammar of trust. In J. Pixley (Ed.), New perspectives on emotions and finance (pp. 99–118). London: Routledge.
Silver, A. (1985). “Trust” in social and political theory. In G. D. Suttles & M. N. Zald (Eds.), The challenge of social control: citizenship and institution building in modern society (pp. 52–67). Norwood: Alex.
Simmel, G. (1950). In K. H. Wolff (Ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.
Simmel, G. (1969). Conflict & the web of group-affiliations. New York: Free Press.
Simmel, G. (1978). The philosophy of money. London: Routledge.
Smart, A. (1993). Gifts, bribes, and guanxi: a reconsideration of Bourdieu’s social capital. Anthropology., 8(3), 388–408.
Tong, C. K., & Yong, P. K. (1998). Guanxi bases, xinyong, and Chinese business networks. British Journal of Sociology, 49(1), 75–96.
Tsang, E. W. K. (1998). Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 64–73.
Wank, D. L. (1999). Commodifying communism: business, trust and politics in a Chinese city. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wank, D. (2002). Business-state clientelism in China: decline or evolution? In T. Gold, D. Guthrie, & D. Wank (Eds.), Social connections in China: institutions, culture, and the changing nature of guanxi (pp. 97–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wedeman, A. (2012). Double paradox: rapid growth and rising corruption in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558–588.
Whyte, M. K. (1996). The Chinese family and economic development: obstacle or engine? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 45(1), 1–30.
Williamson, O. E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1/2), 453–486.
Wilson, S. (2002). Face, norms and instrumentality. In T. Gold, D. Guthrie, & D. Wank (Eds.), Social connections in China: institutions, culture, and the changing nature of guanxi (pp. 163–177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wong, S.-L. (1988). Emigrant entrepreneurs: Shanghai industrialists in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Wong, S.-L. (1996). Chinese entrepreneurs and business trust. In G. G. Hamilton (Ed.), Asian business networks (pp. 13–26). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129–165.
Yan, Y. (1996). The flow of gifts: reciprocity and social networks in a Chinese village. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Yan, Y. (2009). The individualization of Chinese society. Oxford: Berg.
Yang, M. M.-H. (1989). The gift economy and state power in China. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 31(1), 25–54.
Yeung, I. Y. M., & Tung, R. L. (1996). Achieving business success in Confucian societies: the importance of guanxi. Organizational Dynamics, 25(2), 54–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barbalet, J. The structure of guanxi: Resolving problems of network assurance. Theor Soc 43, 51–69 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-013-9211-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-013-9211-2