Skip to main content
Log in

Ambiguity aversion and familiarity bias: Evidence from behavioral and gene association studies

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is increasingly recognized that decision making under uncertainty depends not only on probabilities, but also on psychological factors such as ambiguity and familiarity. Using 325 Beijing subjects, we conduct a neurogenetic study of ambiguity aversion and familiarity bias in an incentivized laboratory setting. For ambiguity aversion, 49.4% of the subjects choose to bet on the 50–50 deck despite the unknown deck paying 20% more. For familiarity bias, 39.6% choose the bet on Beijing’s temperature rather than the corresponding bet with Tokyo even though the latter pays 20% more. We genotype subjects for anxiety-related candidate genes and find a serotonin transporter polymorphism being associated with familiarity bias, but not ambiguity aversion, while the dopamine D5 receptor gene and estrogen receptor beta gene are associated with ambiguity aversion only among female subjects. Our findings contribute to understanding of decision making under uncertainty beyond revealed preference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdellaoui, M., Baillon, A., Placido, L., & Wakker, P. P. (2011). The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. American Economic Review, 101(2), 695–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, D. J., Chabris, C. F., Glaeser, E., Gudnason, V., Harris, T. B., Laibson, D., Lenore, J. L., & Purcell, S. (2007). Genoeconomics. In J. Milner, B. Elaine, C. Trujillo, M. Kaefer, & S. Ross (Eds.), Biosocial surveys. Washington: The National Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canli, T., & Lesch, K. P. (2007). Long story short: The serotonin transporter in emotion regulation and social cognition. Nature Neuroscience, 10(9), 1103–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J., Garcia, J., & Lum, J. (2011). Dopamine receptor genes predict risk preferences, time preferences, and related economic choices. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 42(3), 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2009). Genetic variation in preferences for giving and risk taking. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 809–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S. H. (1983). A generalization of the quasilinear mean with applications to the measurement of income inequality and decision theory resolving the Allais paradox. Econometrica, 51(4), 1065–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S. H. (1989). Axiomatic utility theories with the betweenness property. Annals of Operations Research 19(1), 273–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S. H., & Sagi, J. S. (2006). Event exchangeability: Probabilistic sophistication without continuity or monotonicity. Econometrica, 74(3), 771–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S. H., & Sagi, J. S. (2008). Small worlds: Modeling attitudes toward sources of uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory, 139(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S. H., Li, K. K., Chark, R., & Zhong, S. (2008). Source preference and ambiguity aversion: Models and evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging experiments. In D. Houser, K. McCabe (Eds.), Neuroeconomics. Emerald.

  • Chew, S. H., Li, K. K., Chark, R., & Zhong, S. (2010). Familiarity bias: Evidence from laboratory and field experiments. Working paper.

  • Cloninger, C. R. (1986). A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states. Psychiatric Developments, 4(3), 167–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comings, D. E., Muhleman, D., Johnson, P., & MacMurray, J. P. (1999). Potential role of the estrogen receptor gene(ESR 1) in anxiety. Molecular Psychiatry, 4(4), 374–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisan, L. G., Pana, S., Vulturar, R., Heilman, R. M., Szekely, R., Druga, B., Dragos, N., & Miu, A. C. (2009). Genetic contributions of the serotonin transporter to social learning of fear and economic decision making. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(4), 399–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekel, E. (1986). An axiomatic characterization of preferences under uncertainty: Weakening the independence axiom. Journal of Economic Theory, 40(2), 304–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y. C., Chi, H. C. et al. (2002). Evidence of positive selection acting at the human dopamine receptor D4 gene locus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99(1), 309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreber, A., Apicella, C. L., Eisenberg, D. T. A., Garcia, J. R., Zamore, R. S., Lum, J. K., & Campbell, B. (2009). The 7R polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4) is associated with financial risk taking in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(30), 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Garcia, J. R., Wernerfelt, N., Lum, J. K., & Zeckhauser, R. (2011). Dopamine and risk preferences in different domains. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 43(1), 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergin, H., & Gul, F. (2009). A subjective theory of compound lotteries. Journal of Economic Theory, 144, 899–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 585–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frydman, C., Camerer, C., Bossaerts, P., & Rangel, A. (2011). MAOA-L carriers are better at making optimal financial decisions under risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1714), 2053–2059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, Y. G., Su, Q. R., Su, L. Y., Chen, Q., & Ren, G. Y. (2007). Comparison of the polymorphisms of androgen receptor gene and estrogen alpha and beta gene between adolescent females with first-onset major depressive disorder and control. International Journal of Neuroscience, 117(4), 539–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1989). Maximin expected utility with a non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. R., & Jullien, B. (1988). Ordinal independence in nonlinear utility theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(4), 355–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hariri, A. R., Mattay, V. S., Tessitore, A., Kolachana, B., Fera, F., Goldman, D., Egan, M. F., & Weinberger, D. R. (2002). Serotonin transporter genetic variation and the response of the human amygdala. Science, 297(5580), 400–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., & Tversky, A. (1991). Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, M., Bhatt, M., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Camerer, C. F. (2005). Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science, 310, 1680–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, G. (2001). Familiarity breeds investment. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(3), 659–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huettel, S. A., Stowe, C. J., Gordon, E. M., Warner, B. T., & Platt, M. L. (2006). Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity. Neuron, 49(5), 765–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imwalle, D. B., Gustafsson, J. A., & Rissman, E. F. (2005). Lack of functional estrogen receptor influences anxiety behavior and serotonin content in female mice. Physiology and Behavior, 84(1), 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsdottir, J., Gorin, M. B., Conley, Y. P., Ferrell, R. E., & Weeks, D. E. (2009). Interpretation of genetic association studies: Markers with replicated highly significant odds ratios may be poor classifiers. PLoS Genetics, 5(2), e1000337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise on probability. New York: Macmillan and Co., limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnen, C. M., & Chiao, J. Y. (2009). Genetic determinants of financial risk taking. PLoS One, 4(2), e4362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesch, K. P., Bengel, D., Heils, A., Sabol, S. Z., Greenberg, B. D., Petri, S., Benjamin, J., Muller, C. R., Hamer, D. H., & Murphy, D. L. (1996). Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science, 274(5292), 1527–1531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., Sham, P. C., Owen, M. J., & He, L. (2006). Meta-analysis shows significant association between dopamine system genes and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Human Molecular Genetics, 15(14), 2276–2284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, N., Kirley, A., Hawi, Z., Sham, P., Wickham, H., Kratochvil, C. J., Smith, S. D., Lee, S. Y., Levy, F., & Kent, L. (2004). Joint analysis of the DRD5 marker concludes association with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder confined to the predominantly inattentive and combined subtypes. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 74(2), 348–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, T. D., Rovis, T., Chung, W. C. J., & Handa, R. J. (2005). Novel actions of estrogen receptor-{beta} on anxiety-related behaviors. Endocrinology, 146(2), 797–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. J. (2004). Almost-objective uncertainty. Economic Theory, 24(1), 1–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. J., & Schmeidler, D. (1992). A more robust definition of subjective probability. Econometrica, 60(4), 745–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGough, J. J. (2005). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacogenomics. Biological Psychiatry, 57(11), 1367–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, M. H., Kantoff, P. W., Stampfer, M. J., Mucci, L. A., Parslow, D., Li, H., Gaziano, J. M., Abe, M., & Ma, J. (2007). Prostate cancer risk and ESR1 TA, ESR2 CA repeat polymorphisms. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 16(11), 2233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munaf, M. R., Yalcin, B., Willis-Owen, S. A., & Flint, J. (2008). Association of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene and approach-related personality traits: Meta-analysis and new data. Biological Psychiatry, 63, 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1926). Truth and probability. Studies in Subjective Probability, 61–92.

  • Roe, B. E., Tilley, M. R., Gu, H. H., Beversdorf, D. Q., Sadee, W., Haab, T. C., Papp, A. C. (2009). Financial and psychological risk attitudes associated with two single nucleotide polymorphisms in the nicotine receptor (CHRNA4) gene. PLoS ONE, e6704.

  • Roiser, J. P., de Martino, B., Tan, G. C. Y., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., Wood, N. W., & Dolan, R. J. (2009). A genetically mediated bias in decision making driven by failure of amygdala control. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(18), 5985–5991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D. (1989). Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica, 57(3), 571–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeo, C., Negishi, E., Nakajima, A., Ueno, K., Tatsuno, I., Saito, Y., Amano, K., & Hirai, A. (2005). Association of cytosine-adenine repeat polymorphism of the estrogen receptor-gene with menopausal symptoms. Gender Medicine, 2(2), 96–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanyukov, M. M., Moss, H. B., Kaplan, B. B., Kirillova, G. P., & Tarter, R. E. (2000). Brief research communication antisociality, substance dependence, and the DRD5 gene: A preliminary study. American Journal of Medical Genetics (Neuropsychiatric Genetics), 96, 654–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. New York: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westberg, L., Melke, J., Landen, M., Nilsson, S., Baghaei, F., Rosmond, R., Jansson, M., Holm, G., Bjntorp, P., & Eriksson, E. (2003). Association between a dinucleotide repeat polymorphism of the estrogen receptor alpha gene and personality traits in women. Molecular Psychiatry, 8(1), 118–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, S., Chew, S. H., Set, E., Zhang, J., Xue, H., Sham, P. C., Ebstein, R. P., & Israel, S. (2009a). The heritability of attitude toward economic risk. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12(1), 103–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, S., Israel, S., Xue, H., Sham, P. C., Ebstein, R. P., & Chew, S. H. (2009b). A neurochemical approach to valuation sensitivity over gains and losses. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 4181–4188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, S., Salomon, I., Xue, H., Ebstein, R. P., & Chew, S. H. (2009c). Monoamine oxidase A gene (MAOA) associated with attitude towards longshot risks. PLoS One, 4(12), e8516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zion, I. Z. B., Tessler, R., Cohen, L., Lerer, E., Raz, Y., Bachner-Melman, R., Gritsenko, I., Nemanov, L., Zohar, A. H., & Belmaker, R. H. (2006). Polymorphisms in the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) contribute to individual differences in human sexual behavior: Desire, arousal and sexual function. Molecular Psychiatry, 11(8), 782–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Wang Rui, Wu Qingyu, and Ye Qiaofeng for assistance in conducting the behavioral experiments, and Idan Shalev for doing genotyping. Financial support from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, as well as National University of Singapore, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soo Hong Chew.

Appendix I. Genotyping method

Appendix I. Genotyping method

The polymorphism for the SLC6A4 44 bp deletion/insertion (5-HTTLPR) in the promoter region was characterized using PCR amplification procedure with the following primers: F5′-GGCGTTGCCGCTCTGAATTGC-3′, R5′-GAGGGACTGAGCTGGACAACC-3′. PCR reactions were performed using 5 μl Master Mix (Thermo scientific), 2 μl primers (0.5 μM), 0.6 μl Mg/Cl2 (2.5 mM), 0.4 μl DMSO 5% and 1 μl of water to total of 9 μl total volume and an additional 1 μl of genomic DNA was added to the mixture. All PCR reactions were employed on a Biometra T1 Thermocycler (Biometra, Güttingem, Germany). PCR reaction conditions were as follows: preheating step at 94.0°C for 5 min, 34 cycles of denaturation at 94.0°C for 30 s, reannealing at 55°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 90 s. The reaction proceeded to a hold at 72°C for 5 min. All reaction mixtures were electrophoresed on a 3% agarose gel (AMRESCO) with ethidium bromide to screen for genotype.

Amplification of the DRD5, ESR1 and ESR2 microsatellites was achieved using the following primers: DRD5: forward: 5′- CGTGTATGATCCCTGCAG -3′; reverse: 5′- GCTCATGAGAAGAATGGAGTG -3′; ESR1 (corresponds to the TA dinucleotide repeat in the 5′ promoter region): forward 5′- AGACGCATGATATACTTCACC -3′; reverse 5′- GTTCACTTGGGCTAGGATAT -3′. ESR2 (corresponds to the CA dinucleotide repeat in intron 5): forward (fluorescent) 5′- GGTAAACCATGGTCTGTACC -3′; reverse 5′- AACAAAATGTTGAATGAGTGGG -3′. PCR reactions were performed using 5 μl Master Mix (Thermo scientific), 0.5 μl primers (0.5 μM), 0.4 μl Mg/Cl2 (2.5 mM) and 3.1 μl of water to total of 9 μl total volume and an additional 1 μl of genomic DNA was added to the mixture. All PCR reactions were employed on a Biometra T1 Thermocycler (Biometra, Güttingem, Germany). PCR reaction conditions were as follows: preheating step at 95.0°C for 5 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 95.0°C for 30 s, reannealing at 55°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 40 s. The reaction proceeded to a hold at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR product was analyzed on an ABI 310 DNA Analyzer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chew, S.H., Ebstein, R.P. & Zhong, S. Ambiguity aversion and familiarity bias: Evidence from behavioral and gene association studies. J Risk Uncertain 44, 1–18 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-011-9134-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-011-9134-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation