Abstract
This study has two purposes: the first is to explore experienced science teachers’ perspectives on inquiry teaching, and the second is to categorize these perspectives into patterns. Fifteen junior high school science teachers experienced at inquiry teaching were selected, and a semi-structured interview was conducted to collect the teachers’ perspectives on inquiry and inquiry teaching. The findings indicate that these experienced science teachers hold multiple perspectives on inquiry and inquiry teaching. The two patterns generated from these teachers’ perspectives of inquiry and inquiry teaching were systematic-based inquiry instruction and learning-based inquiry instructions. Suggestions for science teacher educators are discussed in this paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. D., & Helms, J. V. (2002). The ideal of standards and the reality of schools: needed research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 3–16.
American Association for the Advancement of Science, [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brown, P. L., Abell, S. K., Demir, A., & Schmidt, F. J. (2006). College science teachers’ views of classroom inquiry. Science Education, 90(5), 784–802.
Cheng, S. F., Lieu, S. C., & Tuan, H. L. (2005). Science teacher understanding of the nature of science and his teaching practice: a case study of an elementary school teacher. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 13(2), 169–190.
Conway, P. F. (2001). Anticipating reflection while learning to teach: from a temporally truncated to a temporally distributed model of reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 89–106.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: new roles of science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.
Cronin-Jones, L. L. (1991). Science teaching beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 235–250.
De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947–964.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Erickson, G., Brandes, G. M., Mitchill, I., & Mitchill, J. (2005). Collaborative teacher learning: findings from two professional development projects. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 787–798.
Fajet, W., Bello, M., Leftwich, S. A., Mesler, J. L., & Shaver, A. N. (2005). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions in beginning education classes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 717–727.
Glazer, E. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2006). The collaborative apprenticeship model: Situated professional development with in school settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 179–193.
Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 47–63.
Hayes, M. T. (2002). Elementary preservice teachers’ struggles to define inquiry-based science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(2), 147–165.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201–217.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.
Hofstein, A., Carmeli, M., & Shore, R. (2004). The professional development of high school chemistry coordinator. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(1), 3–24.
Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., & Freeman, C. (2005). Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers’ classroom practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 668–690.
Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-Constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: essential research for lasting Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631–645.
Khalick, A. E., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Manlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: international perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419.
Kim, M. C., Hannafin, M. J., & Bryan, L. A. (2007). Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: an emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Science Education, 91, 1010–1030.
Luera, G. R., & Otto, C. A. (2005). Development and evaluation of an inquiry-based elementary science teacher education program reflecting current reform movements. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 241–258.
Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: the impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517–534.
Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. S. (1995). The learning environment at a site of science education reform. Theory into Practice, 34(1), 43–50.
Maor, D., & Taylor, P. C. (1995). Teacher epistemology and scientific inquiry in computerized classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 839–854.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496.
Morge, L. (2005). Teacher-pupil interaction: a study of hidden beliefs in conclusion phases. International Journal of Science Education, 27(8), 935–956.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.
Taylor, A. R., Jones, M. G., Broadwell, B., & Oppewal, T. (2008). Creativity, inquiry, or accountability? Scientists’ and teachers’ perceptions of science education. Science Education, 92(6), 1058–1075.
Trowbridge, L. W., & Bybee, R. W. (1986). Becoming a secondary school science teacher. Columbus: Merrill.
Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., Tsai, C. C., & Cheng, S. F. (2005). Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 541–566.
Tuan, H. L., & Wen, M. C. (2005). The development of an inquiry teaching efficacy uestionnaire. Paper presented at the international conference of Authentic Science and Mathematics (teacher) Education in the Netherlands and Hsinchu, Taiwan
Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.
Wallace, C. S., & Kang, N.-H. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: an examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 936–960.
Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: what can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143.
Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38, 321–441.
Zacharia, Z. (2003). Belief, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry-based experiments in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 792–823.
Acknowledgment
The study was sponsored by the National Research Council, Taiwan, ROC (NSC 97-2511-S-018-008-MY3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tseng, CH., Tuan, HL. & Chin, CC. How to Help Teachers Develop Inquiry Teaching: Perspectives from Experienced Science Teachers. Res Sci Educ 43, 809–825 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9292-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9292-3