Abstract
In the past decade, we have seen the well-established discourse of environmental education (EE) supplanted by that of education for sustainability (EfS). In some ways this change in terminology has been no more than a slogan change, with the actual educational practices associated with EfS little changed from those qualified by EE (Campbell and Robottom 2008). Environment-related education activities under both terms frequently focus on socio-scientific issues – which serve as the chief organising principle for a range of related curriculum activities – and are shaped by the particular characteristics of these issues. Socio-scientific issues are essentially constituted of questions that are philosophical as well as empirical in nature. Socio-scientific issues consist in contests among dissenting social, economic and environmental perspectives that rarely all align, giving rise to debates whose resolution is not amenable to solely scientific approaches. Socio-scientific issues, then, exist at the intersection of differing human interests, values and motivations and are therefore necessarily socially-constructed. An adequate educational exploration of these issues requires a recognition of their constructedness within particular communities of interest and of the limitation of purely applied science perspectives, and, in turn, requires the adoption of curricular and pedagogical approaches that are in fundamental ways informed by constructivist educational assumptions – at least to the extent that community constructions of socio-scientific issues are recognised as being shaped by human interests and social and environmental context. This article considers these matters within the context of examples of environment-related practice drawn from two geographical regions. The article will argue that a serious scientific element is both necessary and insufficient for a rigorous educational exploration of socio-scientific issues within either the EE or EfS discourses, and will consider some implications for professional development and research in this field.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barkin, D. (2000). Overcoming the neoliberal paradigm: sustaining popular development. Journal of Developing Societies, XVI(1), 163–180.
Campbell, C., & Robottom, I. (2008). What’s in a name? Environmental Education and Educational for Sustainable Development as slogans. In E. Gonzalez-Gaudiano & M. Peters (Eds.), Environmental education: Meaning and constitution. A handbook. Rotterdam: Sense.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1983). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Greeno, J., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner & R. Calfree (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York: Macmillan.
Jenkin, N., et al. (2000). Educating for socio-ecological change: Case studies of changing practice in South African tertiary institutions. Australia-South Africa institutional links programme. Grahamstown: Environmental Education Unit, Rhodes University.
Keiny, S., Shachak, M., & Avriel-Avni, N. (2003). “Ecological thinking” as a tool for understanding urban ecosystems: a model from Israel. In A. Berkowitz, C. Nilon, & K. Hollweg (Eds.), Understanding urban ecosystems: A new frontier for science and education. New York: Springer.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 138–157). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kyburz-Graber, R., Hart, P., Posch, P., & Robottom, I. (Eds.). (2006). Reflective practice in teacher education: Learning from case studies of environmental education. Bern: Peter Lang.
Lucas, A. M. (1980). Science and environmental education: pious hopes, self praise and disciplinary chauvinism. Studies in Science Education, 7, 1–26.
RECSAM. (2004). Prospectus for the 2004 Fourth Regional Congress – SSYS. Penang: RECSAM.
Robottom, I (2011). “Changing discourses in EE/ESD: An important role for professional self-development”. In M. Brody, J. Dillon, R. Stevenson and A. Wals. (forthcoming) International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education. American Association for Research in Education.
Shephard, M. (1992). The Simpson Desert: Natural history and human endeavour. NSW: Reed Books.
Skamp, K. (2009). School science and environmental education. In S. M. Ritchie (Ed.), The world of science education. Handbook of research in Australasia. Rotterdam: Sense.
Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. (1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
Stevenson, R., & Robottom, I. (2011). Critical action research and environmental education: concepts and cases in practice. In M. Brody, J. Dillon, R. Stevenson and A. Wals. (forthcoming) International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education. American Association for Research in Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robottom, I. Socio-Scientific Issues in Education: Innovative Practices and Contending Epistemologies. Res Sci Educ 42, 95–107 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9258-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9258-x