Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The “Life at the Poles” Study Unit: Developing Junior High School Students’ Ability to Recognize the Relations Between Earth Systems

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding of Earth’s systems, including the crucial role of human beings within them, is an important part of citizens’ ability to think intelligently and critically about the environment, pollution, sustainability and other socio-economic and scientific issues central to life in the modern world. Part of this understanding involves seeing the world as an integrated whole in which what happens in diverse places in the world may be equally relevant for students' lives. In this regard, it makes sense to study both remote and local environments within the system thinking approach—where such distinctions naturally become blurred. The present research, accordingly, focuses on a study unit entitled “Life at the Poles” and investigates the development of junior high school students’ understanding of Earth systems and their level of conceptual complexity as a result of participating in it. The “Life at the Poles” unit is based on the “explanatory story” approach where one central theme is used as a focal point for an interdisciplinary study of certain natural phenomena, in this case, the possibility of life under the extreme conditions at the poles. Concept maps and Likert-type questionnaires were employed as research tools, allowing the collected data to be analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The research findings indicate that the students significantly improved their Earth systems understanding and, importantly, greatly increased their awareness of human beings’ influence on the environment, including remote environments such as the pole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2002). Nature-based excursions: school students’ perceptions of learning in natural environments. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11, 218–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 518–560. doi:10.1002/tea.20061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2008). System thinking skills at the elementary school level. Presented in the 2008 NARST Annual Meeting. March, 2008. Boltimor, U.S.A.

  • Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: the contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1373–1388. doi:10.1080/09500690500498419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (1993). Reforming science education, social perspective and personal reflections. New-York: Teachers College Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B., Lazonby, J., Millar, R., Nicolson, P., Ramsden, J., & Waddington, D. (1994). Science: the Salters' approach - a case study of the process of large scale curriculum development. Science Education, 78, 415–447. doi:10.1002/sce.3730780503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. (1998). An experiment in using the internet in teaching and learning mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 249–258. doi:10.1023/A:1021844508021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, J., & Osborne, J. (2007). Supporting teachers on science focused school trips: towards an integrated framework of theory and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 685–710. doi:10.1080/09500690600802254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J. (2003). On learners and learning in environmental education: missing theories, ignored communities. Environmental Education Research, 9, 215–226. doi:10.1080/13504620303480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., et al. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. The School Science Review, 87, 107–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J., & Tobin, K. (1992). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in classroom environment research. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: antecedents, consequences and evaluation. London: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing learning about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 247–298. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS0903_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Understanding complex systems: some core challenges. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 53–61. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1501_7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., Shore, R., & Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory: a case study. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 47–62. doi:10.1080/0950069032000070342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. (2006). The student voice and school science education. Studies in Science Education, 42, 49–88. doi:10.1080/03057260608560220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. G., Taylor, A., Minogue, J., Broadwell, B., Wiebe, E., & Carter, G. (2007). Understanding scale: powers of ten. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 191–202. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-9034-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kali, Y., Orion, N., & Eylon, B. (2003). The effect of knowledge integration activities on students’ perception of the earth’s crust as a cyclic system. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 545–565. doi:10.1002/tea.10096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, O. N. (2008). A student-centred approach: assessing the changes in prospective science teachers’ conceptual understanding by concept mapping in a general chemistry laboratory. Research in Science Education, 38, 91–110. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9048-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinchin, I. M., & Hay, D. B. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42, 43–57. doi:10.1080/001318800363908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, C. (2002). The ‘Explanatory Stories’ approach to a curriculum for a global science literacy. In V. J. Mayer (Ed.), Global science literacy (pp. 53–78). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • King, C. (2008). Geoscience education: an overview. Studies in Science Education, 44(2), 187–222. doi:10.1080/03057260802264289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. Y., & Hu, R. (2003). Students’ understanding of energy flow and matter cycling in the context of the food chain, photosynthesis and respiration. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1529–1544. doi:10.1080/0950069032000052045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C. (2000). Designing the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 781–796. doi:10.1080/095006900412275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. L. (1992). Concept mapping: a tool to develop reflective science instruction. Science Education, 76, 51–63. doi:10.1002/sce.3730760105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. L., Mintzes, J. J., & Clavijo, I. E. (2000). Restructing knowledge in biology: Cognitive processes and metacognitive reflections. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 303–323. doi:10.1080/095006900289895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magntorn, O., & Helldn, G. (2005). Student-teachers’ ability to read nature: reflections on their own learning in ecology. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1229–1254. doi:10.1080/09500690500102706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, V. J. (1995). Using the earth system for integrating the science curriculum. Science Education, 79, 375–391. doi:10.1002/sce.3730790403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, V. J. (ed). (2002). Global science literacy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: Kings College, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19, 29–52. doi:10.1007/BF00377984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orion, N. (1993). A model for the development and implementation of field trips as an integral part of the science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 93, 325–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orion, N. (2002). An earth systems curriculum development model. In V. J. Mayer (Ed.), Global science literacy (pp. 159–168). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Orion, N., & Ault, C. (2007). Learning earth sciences. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 653–688). USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics. Science & Technology Education, 3, 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. (2005). A motivational view of constructivist-informed teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1853–1881. doi:10.1080/09500690500339654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penner, D. A. (2000). Explaining systems investigating middle school students’ understanding of emergent phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 784–806. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8<784::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-E.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. (1992). Teaching and learning. “Theory one and beyond “. In. Smart Schools. (Pp. 43–72). Free Press.

  • Pioche, B., The National Geographic Society, & Jacquet, L. (2005). March of the Penguins. Warner Independent Pictures and National Geographic Feature Films.

  • Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2008). Contextualizing instruction: leveraging students’ prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 79–100. doi:10.1002/tea.20203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio & A. Alvarez (Eds.), A sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rye, J. A., & Rubba, P. A. (1998). An exploration of the concept map as an interview tool to facilitate the externalization of students' understandings about global atmospheric change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 521–546. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199805)35:5<521::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoullos, M., Alampei, A., & Malotidi, V. (2004). The Methodological framework of the development of the educational package “Water in the Mediterranean”. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 5, 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skamp, K., Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2004). Students’ ideas and attitudes about air quality. Research in Science Education, 34(3), 313–342. doi:10.1023/B:RISE.0000044643.24770.5c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P., III, Disessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: a constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 115–163. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Songer, C. J., & Mintzes, J. J. (1994). Understanding cellular respiration: an analysis of conceptual change in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 621–637. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. H. T. West & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 211–231). Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, J. R. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge University Press.

  • Stoddart, T., Abrams, R., Gasper, E., & Canaday, D. (2000). Concept maps as assessment in science inquiry learning: a report of methodology. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1221–1246. doi:10.1080/095006900750036235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: a discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 297–328. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9090-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Palmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, A., & Sela, D. (2003). Her physics, his physics: gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 245–268. doi:10.1080/09500690210126766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science and Technology Education Department, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel

    Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf & Idit Orpaz

Authors
  1. Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Idit Orpaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., Orpaz, I. The “Life at the Poles” Study Unit: Developing Junior High School Students’ Ability to Recognize the Relations Between Earth Systems. Res Sci Educ 40, 525–549 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9132-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9132-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation