Abstract
A lack of congruency between the teaching and learning of science and the student’s personal worlds has long been recognised by the international science education community as an issue deserving space in the research agenda. The purpose of this study was to explore the diversity of student reactions when subcultures such as family, community peers, and personal worldviews are considered along side the subculture of school science. Two-hundred and fifty students from urban and provincial schools in the northeastern region of Colombia (South America) participated. From this group, 18 students were interviewed. It was observed that students adopt a compartmentalisation of knowledge that is evident as both an avoiding strategy in the classroom and as a mechanism to differentiate between the natural world of their everyday situations and the one portrayed by a Westernised science instruction in the classroom. The findings reflect how multiple worldviews correlate with student frameworks as implanted by school science.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
All participant names are pseudonyms.
References
Abdalá, E. (2003). Youth, education and employment in Latin America. International Work Organisation (IWO). Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://www.iica.org.uy/redlat/mayo1.pdf.
Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.
Aikenhead, G. (2001). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85, 180–188.
Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York and London: Teacher College Press.
Aikenhead, G., & Jegede, O. (1998). Transcending cultural borders: Implications for science teaching. Retrieved June 20, 2003, from http://www.uohk.edu.hk/cridal/misc/jegede.htm.
Aikenhead, G., & Jegede, O. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 269–287.
Antonio Restrepo Barco Foundation (FARB) Colombia. (2003). Between progress and failures. Retrieved February 10, 2003, from http://www.funrestrepobarco.org.co.
Ardila, R. (1986). Psychology of the Colombian citizen. Bogotá, Colombia: Planeta.
Atwater, M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion into the multicultural science education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 821–837.
Baker, D., & Taylor, P. (1995). The effect of culture on the learning of science in non-Western countries: The results of an integrated research review. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 695–704.
Bleicher, R. E., Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (2003). Opportunities to talk science in a high school chemistry classroom. Research in Science Education, 33, 319–339.
Cobern, W. (1991). World view theory and science education research. Monograph no. 3. Manhattan, KS: National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST).
Cobern, W. (1997). Distinguishing science-related variations in the causal universal of college students’ worldviews. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 1, 13–19.
Cobern, W. (2000). Everyday thoughts about nature: Worldview investigations of important concepts students use to make sense of nature with specific attention of science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Cobern, W. W., Gibson, A. T., & Underwood, S. A. (1999). Everyday thoughts about nature: An interpretive study on 16 ninth graders’ conceptualizations of nature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 541–564.
Costa, V. (1995). When science is “another world”: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79, 313–333.
Costa, V. (1997). How teacher and students study ‘all that matters’ in high school chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 1005–1023.
Dart, F. E. (1972). Science and the worldview. Physics Today, 25, 48–54.
Delamont, S., & Galton, M. (1986). Inside the secondary classroom. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE, from its Spanish acronym) [Colombia’s National Department of Statistics]. Retrieved January 5, 2005, from http://www.dane.gov.co.
Donnelly, C. (2000). In pursuit of school ethos. British Journal of Educational Studies, 48, 134–154.
Eger, M. (1992). Hermeneutics and science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 1, 337–348.
El Tiempo [The Times]. Retrieved July 24, 2004, from http://eltiempo.terra.com.co.
Enger, K. S., & Yager R. (1994). The Iowa assessment handbook. Iowa City, IA: Science Education Center. The University of Iowa.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.
Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), The international handbook on science education (pp. 1155–1173). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Francis, L., & Greer, J. (1999). Attitude toward science among secondary school pupils in Northern Ireland: Relationship with sex, age and religion. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1, 67–71.
George, J. (1999). World view analysis of the knowledge in a rural village: Implications for science education. Culture and Comparative Studies, 83, 77–95.
Germann, P. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8, 689–703.
Gitari, W. (2005). Everyday objects of learning about health and healing and implications for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 1–22.
Gray, B. (1999). Science education in the developing world: Issues and considerations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 261–268.
Hammer, C. S., Miccio, A. W., & Rodriguez, B. (2004). Bilingual language acquisition and the child socialization process. In B. Goldstein (Ed.), Bilingual language development and disorders in Spanish–English speakers (pp. 21–52). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Jegede, O. (1994). Traditional cosmology and collateral learning in non-Western science classrooms. Toowoomba, Queensland: Research & Evaluation Unit Distance Education Center, University of Southern Queensland.
Jegede, O. (1995). Collateral learning and the eco-cultural paradigm in science and mathematics education in Africa. Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, 25, 97–137.
Kyle, W. (1999). Science education in developing countries: Challenging first world hegemony in a global context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 255–260.
Larson, J. O. (1995, April). Fatima’s rules and other elements of an unintended chemistry curriculum. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
La Opinión [The Opinion]. Retrieved April 12, 2004, from http://www.laopinion.com.co.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York, NY: Routledge.
McKinley, E. (2005). Locating the global: Culture, language and science education for indigenous students. International Journal of Research in Science Education, 27, 227–241.
McRobbie, C. J., & Tobin, K. (1995). Restraints to reforms: The congruence of teacher and students actions in a chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 373–385.
Medvitz, A. G. (1996, August). Science, schools and culture: The complexity of reform in science education. Paper presented to the 8th symposium of the International Organisation for Science and Technology Education (IOSTE), Edmonton, Canada.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Molano, A. (1987). Selva Adentro: Una historia oral de la colonización del Guaviare (Inside the jungle: An oral history of the colonisation of the Guaviare region). Bogota, Colombia: Ancora.
National Academy of Science (NAS). (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ogawa, M. (1989). Science education in a multi-science perspective. Science Education, 79, 583–593.
Ogawa, M., & Omoifo, C. (2002) Students’ perceptions and patterns of transition in science learning in two non-Western countries. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST). New Orleans, LA.
Okebukola, P., & Jegede, O. (1990). Eco-cultural influences upon students’ concept attainment in science. Journal of Research in Science Education, 27, 661–669.
Phelan, P., Davidson, A., & Cao, H. (1991). Students’ multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22, 224–250.
Phelan, P., Davidson, A., & Cao, H. (1997). Adolescents’ worlds: Negotiating family, peers, and school. New York and London: Teachers College Press.
Piburn, M., & Baker, D. (1993). If I were the teacher...qualitative study of attitude towards science. Science Education, 77, 393–406.
Pomeroy, D. (1994). Science education and cultural diversity: Mapping the field. Studies in Science Education, 24, 49–73.
Puryear, J., & Olivos, A. (2003, April). Putting education first: A conference report of the Inter-American dialogue. Paper presented at a conference sponsored by the Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC.
Rodríguez, B. L., & Olswang, B. (2003). Mexican-American and Anglo-American mothers’ beliefs and values about child rearing, education and language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 452–462.
Roth, W. M., McRobbie, C. J., & Lucas, K. (1999). One class, two worlds. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 59–75.
Shapiro, B. (1994). What children bring to light. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Siegel, H. (2002). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education: In search of common ground. Science Education, 80, 803–820.
Smolicz, J. J., & Nunan, E. E. (1975). The philosophical and sociological foundations of science education: The demythologising of science education. Studies in Science Education, 2, 101–143.
Snively, G., & Corsiglia, J. (2000). Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education. Science Education, 80, 7–34.
Solvason, C. (2005). Investigating specialist school ethos...or do you mean culture? Educational Studies, 31, 85–94.
Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (2000). Teaching sciences: The multiculturalism question revisited. Science Education, 80, 35–49.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor. P. C. S. (1994). Establishing a critical discourse on cultural myths that shape the social reality of the science classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Anaheim, CA.
Tharp, R. (1994). Research knowledge and policy issues in cultural diversity and education. In B. McLeod (Ed.), Language and learning: Educating linguistically diverse students (pp. 129–167). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Tobin, K. (2005). Building enacted science curricula on the capital of learners. Science Education, 89, 577–594.
Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996). Cultural myths as constraints to the enacted science curriculum. Science Education, 80, 223–241.
Tooley, J. (1999). The global education industry: Lessons from private education in developing countries. Washington, D.C.: International Finance Corporation.
Weinstein, M. (1998). Playing the paramecium: Science education from the stance of the cultural studies of science. Educational Policy, 12, 484–506.
Yager, R. (1988). Never playing the game. The Science Teacher, 9, 77–78.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to acknowledge the invaluable insight provided by Dr. Robert Yager in completing this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Medina-Jerez, W. Between Local Culture and School Science: The Case of Provincial and Urban Students from Eastern Colombia. Res Sci Educ 38, 189–212 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9044-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9044-y