Skip to main content
Log in

Training Future Scientists: Predicting First-year Minority Student Participation in Health Science Research

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using longitudinal data from the UCLA Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP) and Your First College Year (YFCY) surveys, this study examines predictors of the likelihood that science-oriented students would participate in a health science undergraduate research program during the first year of college. The key predictors of participation in health science research programs are students’ reliance on peer networks and whether campuses provide structured opportunities for first-year students even though only 12% of freshmen in the sample engaged in this activity. These experiences are particularly important for Black students. The findings inform efforts to orient students at an early stage, particularly under-represented minorities, toward biomedical and behavioral science research careers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Under-represented racial minorities (URMs) include Black, Latina/o, and American Indian students.

References

  • Akom, A. A. (2006). The racial dimension of social capital: Toward a new understanding of youth empowerment and community organizing in America’s urban core. In S. Ginwright, P. Noguera, & J. Cammarota (Eds.), Beyond resistance! Youth activism and community change. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonio, A. L. (2004). The influence of friendship groups on intellectual self-confidence and educational aspirations in college. Journal of Higher Education, 75(4), 446–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1977). Four critical years: Effects of college on beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W., & Astin, H. S. (1992). Undergraduate science education: The impact of different college environments on the educational pipeline in the sciences. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Higher Education Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, A. E. L., & Villarejo, M. (2004). Making a difference for minorities: Evaluation of an educational enrichment program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 861–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benitez, M. (1998). Hispanic-serving institutions: Challenges and opportunities. New Directions for Higher Education, 102, 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E. M. (2004). The diversity scorecard: A learning approach to institutional change. Change, (January/February), 45–52.

  • Bordieu, P., & Passerson, J. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, W. K., Revelle, W., & Pinto, L. H. (2002). Improving biology performance with workshop groups. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(4), 347–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research university. Stanford: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M. (2000). Reworking the student departure puzzle. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A. F., Stampen, J., & Hansen, W. (1990). Exploring the effects of ability to pay on persistence in college. Review of Higher Education, 13(3), 303–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, G., Denes, R., & Morrison, C. (2000). Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnavale, A. P., & Fry, R. A. (1999). Crossing the great divide: Can we achieve equity when generation Y goes to college? Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D. F. (2002). College students’ degree aspirations: A theoretical model and literature review with a focus on African American and Latino students. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: A handbook of theory and research (pp. 129–171). Bronx: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. W. (1969). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(S), 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee for the Assessment of NIH Minority Research Training Programs. (2005). Assessment of NIH minority research and training programs: Phase 3. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drane, D., Smith, H. D., Light, G., Pinto, L., & Swarat, S. (2005). The gateway science workshop program: Enhancing student performance and retention in the sciences through peer-facilitated discussion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 337–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eide, E., Brewer, D. J., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (1998). Does it pay to attend an elite private college? Evidence on the effects of undergraduate college quality on graduate school attendance. Economics of Education Review, 17(4) 371–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, D. (2006). So that’s why they’re leaving. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved February 2, 2007 from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/07/26/scipipeline

  • Foertsch, J., Alexander, B. B., & Penberthy, D. (1997). Summer research opportunity programs (SROPs) for minority undergraduates: A longitudinal study of program outcomes, 1986–1996. Madison: The Lead Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries-Britt, S. (1998). Moving beyond black achiever isolation: Experiences of gifted black collegians. The Journal of Higher Education, 69(5), 556–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. B. (2005). Does globalization of the scientific/engineering workforce threaten U.S. economic leadership? NBER Working Paper 11457. Retrieved March 16, 2007, from the National Bureau of Economic Research website: http://www.nber.org/papers/w11457

  • Gándara, P., & Maxwell-Jolly, J. (1999). Priming the pump: Strategies for increasing the achievement of underrepresented minority undergraduates. New York: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedeker, D., & Gibbons, R. D. (2006). Longitudinal data analysis. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, G., Taddese, N., & Walter, E. (2000). Entry and persistence of women and minorities in college science and engineering education. Retrieved March 16, 2007, from the U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics website: http://www.nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2000601

  • Hurtado, S., & Carter, D. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 324–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, S., Cerna, O. S., Chang, J. C., Sáenz, V. B., Lopez, L. R., Mosqueda, C., Oseguera, L., Chang, M. J., & Korn, W. S. (2006). Aspiring scientists: Characteristics of college freshmen interested in the biomedical and behavioral sciences. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, S., Han, J. C., Sáenz, V. B., Espinosa, L. L., Cabrera, N. L., & Cerna, O.S. (2007). Predicting transition and adjustment to college: Minority biomedical and behavioral science students’ first year of college. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 841–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, R. A. (1996). Enhancing the minority presence in graduate education vii: Latino experiences in graduate education: Implications for change. Washington: Council of Graduate Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonides, J. (1995). Evaluation and dissemination of an undergraduate program to improve retention of at-risk students. Ann Arbor, MI (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 414841).

  • Kao, G. (2004). Social capital and its relevance to minority and immigrant populations. Sociology of Education, 77(2), 172–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, C. M. (2000). Evaluation of an undergraduate research experience: Perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katkin, W. (2003). The Boyer Commission Report and its impact on undergraduate research. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 93, 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keup, J. R., & Stolzenberg, E. B. (2004). Your first college year survey: Exploring the academic and personal experiences of first-year students. Columbia: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First Year Experience and Students in Transition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinkead, J. (2003). Learning through inquiry: An overview of undergraduate research. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 93, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Alge, B. (1999). Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(6), 886–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 123–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). The effects of student–faculty interaction in the 1990s. Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laden, B. V. (2004). Hispanic-serving institutions: What are they? Where are they? Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28(3), 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo, C. M., & Rolison, G. (1986). Alienation of ethnic minority students at a predominantly white university. Journal of Higher Education, 57(1), 58–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopatto, D. (2003). The essential features of undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 23, 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3(4), 270–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabrouk, P. A., & Peters, K. (2000). Student perspectives on undergraduate research (UR) experiences in chemistry and biology. Retrieved November 2006, from the Spring 2000 CONFCHEM website: http://www.chem.vt.edu/confchem/2000/a/mabrouk/mabrouk.htm

  • Maton, K. I., Hrabowski, F. A., & Schmitt, C. L. (2000). African American college students excelling in the sciences: College and postcollege outcomes in the Meyerhoff Scholars Program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 629–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, G. J., & Krishnan, T. (1997). The EM algorithm and extensions. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, C. A. (2003). Undergraduate research at the research universities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 93, 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagda, B. A., Gregerman, S. R., Jonides, J., von Hippel, W., & Lerner, J. S. (1998). Undergraduate student–faculty research partnerships affect student retention. The Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2002). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Retrieved November 28, 2006, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf03312/pdfstart.htm

  • National Science and Technology Council. (2000). Ensuring a strong U.S. scientific, technical, and engineering workforce in the 21st century. Retrieved November 28, 2006, from http://www.ostp.gov/nstc/html/_reports_archives.html

  • Nicholas, D. (1997). Making more minority scientists. Environmental Health Perspectives, 105(2), 174–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nora, A., Barlow, L., & Crisp, G. (2005). Student persistence and degree attainment beyond the first year in college. In A. Seidman (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for success (pp. 129–153). Westport: Praeger Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outcalt, C. L., & Skewes-Cox, T. E. (2002). Involvement, interaction, and satisfaction: The human environment at HBCUs. The Review of Higher Education, 25(3), 331–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 1). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1977). Patterns of student–faculty informal interaction beyond the classroom and voluntary freshman attrition. Journal of Higher Education, 48(5), 540–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1978). The relation of students’ precollege characteristics and freshman year experience to voluntary attrition. Research in Higher Education, 9(4), 347–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W. (2004). Understanding the decision to enroll in graduate school: Sex and racial/ethnic group differences. Journal of Higher Education, 75(5), 487–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W., & Titus, M. A. (2004). Understanding differences in the choice of college attended: The role of state public policies. The Review of Higher Education, 27(4), 501–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. R. (2006). Institutional structures and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 47(5), 521–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P. D. (2001). Analyzing faculty workload data using multilevel modeling. Research in Higher Education, 42(2), 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provasnik, S., & Shafer, L. L. (2004). Historically black colleges and universities, 1976 to 2001 (NCES 2004-062). http://www.nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004062.pdf

  • Pryor, J. H., Hurtado, S., Sáenz, V. B, Santos, J. L., & Korn, W. S. (2007). The American freshman: Forty year trends. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, T. A. (1970). Intentional behavior. New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatini, D. A. (1997). Teaching and research synergism: The undergraduate research experience. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 123(3), 98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax, L. J., Hurtado, S., Lindholm, J., Astin, A., Korn, W., & Mahoney, K. (2004). The American freshman: National norms for fall 2004. Los Angeles: UCLA, Higher Education Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (2000). Explaining the unrealized aspirations of racial and ethnic minorities. In G. Campbell, R. Denes, & C. Morrison (Eds.), Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise (pp. 174–187). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, C. C., & Mable, P. (1994). Realizing the educational potential of residence halls. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. C. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., Hunter, A., Laursen, S. L., & Deantoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solórzano, D.G., & Ornelas, A. (2004). A critical race analysis of Latina/o and African American advanced placement enrollment in public high schools. High School Journal, 87(3), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spady, W. (1970). Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis. Interchange, 1(1), 64–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton-Salazar, R. D. (1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youths. Harvard Education Review, 67(1), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton-Salazar, R. D., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1995). Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education, 68(2), 116–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton, L. M. & Lissitz, R. W. (1999). Evaluating faculty salary equity using hierarchical linear modeling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada, April 19, 1999.

  • Strenta, A. C., Elliot, R., Adair, R., Matier, M., & Scott, J. (1993). Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions. Research in Higher Education, 35(5), 513–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The College Board. (2001). Access to excellence. New York: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. L, & Heck, R. H. (2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 517–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G. (1992). An anthropological analysis of student participation in college. Journal of Higher Education, 63(6), 603–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropouts from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of the recent literature. A Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, M. A. (2006). Understanding the influence of the financial context of institutions on student persistence at four-year colleges and universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(2), 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, P. U. (1985). A study of the mathematics achievement of Black students at the University of California, Berkeley. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, Professional Development Program.

  • Upcraft, M. L., Gardner, J. N., & Barefoot, B. O. (2003). Campus climates for first-year student success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington, DC.

  • Valencia, R., & Solórzano, D. (1997). Contemporary deficit thinking. In R. Valencia (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking in educational thought and practice. New York: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetter, B. M. (1994). The next generation of scientists and engineers: Who’s in the pipeline? In W. Pearson Jr., & A. Fechter (Eds.), Who will do science? Educating the next generation (pp. 1–19). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S., & Locke, E. A. (2000). Problems with the Pygmalion effect and some proposed solutions. Leadership Quarterly, 11(3), 389–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. (2000). Barriers to minority success in college science, mathematics, engineering programs. In G. Campbell, R. Denes, & C. Morrison (Eds.), Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise (pp. 193–206). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yosso, T. J. (2006). Critical race: Counterstories along the Chicana/Chicano educational pipeline. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was made possible by the support of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH Grant Number 1 RO1 GMO71968-01. This independent research and the views expressed here do not indicate endorsement by the sponsor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvia Hurtado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hurtado, S., Eagan, M.K., Cabrera, N.L. et al. Training Future Scientists: Predicting First-year Minority Student Participation in Health Science Research. Res High Educ 49, 126–152 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-007-9068-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-007-9068-1

Keywords

Navigation