Skip to main content
Log in

Where are the sources of stock market mispricing and excess volatility?

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a simple dividend model, we illustrate and synthesize the sources of stock market mispricing and excess volatility based upon two hypotheses—inflation illusion and heterogeneous beliefs. Our theoretical framework posits that equity mispricing arises when investors have subjective expectations about discount rates or dividend growth rates. We then analyze the sources of equity mispricing and market excess volatility under a VAR framework. Empirically, we find that both inflation illusion and heterogeneous beliefs explain equity mispricing. However, heterogeneous beliefs play a more important role in explaining stock mispricing in the long run. We also find that heterogeneous beliefs cause excess volatility, but inflation illusion does not. Therefore, dispersion in investors’ beliefs is a better explanation of stock market mispricing than the investors’ inability to properly discount future cash flows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See, for example, Campbell and Vuolteenaho (2004), Cohen et al. (2005), Brunnermeier and Julliard (2008), and Chen et al. (2009a).

  2. Inflation is exponentially smoothed using 12 monthly lags. Excess log dividend growth rates are the realized log dividend growth rate minus 3-month log T-bill rates. Excess returns are calculated in the same manner.

  3. Many other proxies have been proposed. For example, Graham and Harvey (1996) use the dispersion among newsletter "forecasts"; Bessembinder et al. (1996) employ the open interest on the Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500 Index futures; and Scheinkman and Xiong (2003) and Chen et al. (2009a) use trading volume.

  4. We drop the component stocks with less than three earnings estimates for the corresponding quarter. For a robust check, we also use the range of financial analyst estimates and find the results are qualitatively the same.

  5. The detailed statistics are upon request.

  6. We use the data from 1974 because the I/B/E/S data is available from 1974.

  7. Similar to Brunnermeier and Julliard (2008), we use Bayesian regression for the tests.

  8. Follow Campbell and Vuolteenaho (2004), we employ one lag in the VAR model.

  9. Alternatively, we also incorporate risk measures (i.e., VIX and default yield spread) into the VAR, the test results are qualitatively similar.

References

  • Alpert M, Raiffa H (1959) A progress report on the training of probability assessors. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (eds) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson EW, Ghysels E, Juergens JL (2005) Do heterogeneous beliefs matter for asset pricing? Rev Financ Stud 18:875–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartov E, Kim M (2004) Risk, mispricing, and value investing. Rev Quant Financ Account 23:353–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beber A, Breedon F, Buraschi A (2010) Differences in beliefs and currency risk premiums. J Financ Econ 98:415–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessembinder H, Chan K, Seguin P (1996) An empirical examination of information, differences in opinion and trading activity. J Financ Econ 11:255–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown L (2001) A temporal analysis of earnings surprise: profits versus losses. J Account Res 39:221–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier MK, Julliard C (2008) Money illusion and housing frenzies. Rev Financ Stud 21:135–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JY (1991) A variance decomposition for stock returns. Econ J 101:157–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JY, Cochrane JH (1999) By force of habit: a consumption-based explanations of aggregate stock market behavior. J Polit Econ 107:205–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JY, Shiller RJ (1988) The dividend-price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors. Rev Financ Stud 1:195–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JY, Vuolteenaho T (2004) Inflation illusion and stock prices. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 94:19–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capstaff J, Paudyal K, Rees W (1998) Analysts’ forecasts of german firms’ earnings: a comparative analysis abstract. J Int Financ Manage Account 9:83–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Kohn RV (2011) Asset price bubbles from heterogeneous beliefs about mean reversion rates. Financ Stoch 15:221–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Hong H, Stein J (2002) Breadth of ownership and stock returns. J Financ Econ 66:171–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CR, Lung P, Wang FA (2009a) Stock market mispricing: money illusion or resale option? J Financ Quant Anal 44:1125–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CR, Lung P, Wang FA (2009b) Mispricing and the cross-section of stock returns. Rev Quant Financ Acc 32:317–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen RB, Polk C, Vuolteenaho T (2005) Inflation illusion in the stock market: the modigliani–cohn hypothesis. Quart J Econ 120:639–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel K, Hirshleifer D, Subrahmanyam A (1998) A theory of overconfidence, self-attribution, and security market under-and over reactions. J Finance 53:1839–1885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow P, Sloan R (1997) Returns to contrarian investment strategies: tests of naive expectations hypothesis. J Financ Econ 41:3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diether KB, Malloy CJ, Scherbina A (2002) Differences of opinion and the cross-section of stock returns. J Finance 57:2113–2141

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterwood J, Nutt S (1999) Inefficiency in analysts’ earnings forecasts: systematic misreaction or systematic optimism? J Finance 54:1777–1797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF, French KR (1988) Dividend yields and expected stock returns. J Financ Econ 22:3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher I (1928) Inflation illusion. Adelphi, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon M (1962) The investment, financing, and valuation of the corporation. Irwin, Homewood, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham J, Harvey C (1996) Market timing ability and volatilities implied in investment newsletters’ asset allocation recommendations. J Financ Econ 42:397–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JM, Kreps D (1978) Speculative investor behavior in a stock market with heterogeneous expectations. Quart J Econ 89:323–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyle AS, Wang FA (1997) Speculation duopoly with agreement to disagree: can overconfidence survive the market test? J Finance 52:2073–2090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R (1996) Expectations and the cross-section of stock returns. J Finance 51:1715–1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B, Phillips LD (1982) Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to, 1980. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (eds) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto DA (2002) Management’s incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. Account Rev 77:483–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller EM (1977) Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion. J Finance 32:1151–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani F, Cohn R (1979) Inflation, rational valuation, and the market. Financ Anal J 37:24–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patinkin D (1965) Money, interest, and prices. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter JR, Warr RS (2002) The decline of inflation and the bull market of 1982–1999. J Financ Quant Anal 37:29–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheinkman JA, Xiong W (2003) Overconfidence and speculative bubbles. J Polit Econ 111:1183–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1977) The limits of arbitrage. J Finance 52:35–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole J (1982) On the possibility of speculation under rational expectations. Econometrica 50:1163–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JB (1938) The theory of investment value. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong W, Yu J (2011) The Chinese warrants bubble. Am Econ Rev 101:2723–2753

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl R. Chen.

Appendix

Appendix

We define \( x_{t} \) as a 4 × 1 vector for the four variables at time t, i.e.,Footnote 9

$$ x_{t} = (\tilde{p}_{t} - \tilde{d}_{t} ,\Updelta d_{t}^{e} ,r_{t}^{e} ,\pi_{t} )^{'} . $$
(15)

The VAR system with one lag is specified as

$$ x_{t} = Bx_{t - 1} + \xi_{t} , $$
(16)

where B is a 4 × 4 matrix of VAR coefficients and \( \xi_{t} \) is a 4 × 1 vector representing the shocks to the VAR system. Given (16), the multiperiod forecast is determined as

$$ E_{t} (x_{t + \tau } ) = B^{\tau } x_{t} . $$
(17)

Define further two vectors, \( e2 = (0,1,0,0)^{'} \) and \( e3 = (0,0,1,0)^{'} \), the discounted expected future excess log dividend growth rates, \(\sum_{\tau = 1}^{\infty } {\rho^{\tau - 1} } \hat{E}_{t} (\Updelta d_{t + \tau }^{e} )\), are, therefore, given by

$$ \sum\limits_{\tau = 1}^{\infty } {\rho^{\tau - 1} } \hat{E}_{t} (\Updelta d_{t + \tau }^{e} ) = \sum\limits_{\tau = 1}^{\infty } {\rho^{\tau - 1} } e2^{'} B^{\tau } x_{t} = e2^{'} B(I - \rho B)^{ - 1} x_{t} , $$
(18)

where \( \hat{E}_{t} \) is the conditional expectations calculated using the estimated VAR parameters. Likewise, the discounted expected future excess log returns, \( \sum\nolimits_{\tau = 1}^{\infty } {\rho^{\tau - 1} } \hat{E}_{t} (r_{t + \tau }^{e} ), \) are given by

$$ \sum\limits_{\tau = 1}^{\infty } {\rho^{\tau - 1} } \hat{E}_{t} (r_{t + \tau }^{e} ) = \sum\limits_{\tau = 1}^{\infty } {\rho^{\tau - 1} } e3^{'} B^{\tau } x_{t} = e3^{'} B(I - \rho B)^{ - 1} x_{t}. $$
(19)

With the estimated VAR parameters, we can decompose the realized, demeaned log price-dividend ratio, \( \tilde{p}_{t} - \tilde{d}_{t} \), into three components: (a) the discounted expected excess log dividend growth rates, \( \sum_{\tau = 1}^{\infty } {\rho^{\tau - 1} } \hat{E}_{t} \left( {\Updelta d_{t + \tau }^{e} } \right); \) (b) the discounted expected excess log stock returns, \( \sum_{\tau = 1}^{\infty } {\rho^{\tau - 1} } \hat{E}_{t} \left( {r_{t + \tau }^{e} } \right); \) and (c) the mispricing term, \( \tilde{\varepsilon }_{t} \), as follows,

$$ \tilde{p}_{t} - \tilde{d}_{t} = \sum\limits_{\tau = 1}^{\infty } {\rho^{\tau - 1} } \hat{E}_{t} (\Updelta d_{t + \tau }^{e} ) - \sum\limits_{\tau = 1}^{\infty } {\rho^{\tau - 1} } \hat{E}_{t} (r_{t + \tau }^{e} ) + \tilde{\varepsilon }_{t}. $$
(20)

The demeaned fundamental component, \( p_{t} - d_{t} \), consists of the first two terms in the right-hand side of (A6), whereas the mispricing term, \( \tilde{\varepsilon }_{t} \), is the difference between the realized price-dividend ratio, \( \tilde{p}_{t} - \tilde{d}_{t} \), and the fundamental component, \( p_{t} - d_{t} \).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, C.R., Lung, P.P. & Wang, F.A. Where are the sources of stock market mispricing and excess volatility?. Rev Quant Finan Acc 41, 631–650 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-012-0326-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-012-0326-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation