Skip to main content
Log in

US stock market volatility persistence: evidence before and after the burst of the IT bubble

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we test whether the US stock market volatility presents a different behavior before and after the burst of the IT bubble. Using long range dependence techniques we examine the order of integration in the absolute and squared returns in three daily stock market indices (DJIA, S&P and NASDAQ). The results indicate that both absolute and squared returns present long memory behavior. In general, the highest orders of integration in the volatility processes correspond to the NASDAQ index. The results also show that in most cases the volatility is more persistent in the bear market than in the bull market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Most of these papers studying stock market volatility define stock markets cycles (bull and bear markets) using a traditional algorithm developed by Bry and Boschan (1971) to stock prices. An alternative approach to identify bull and bear markets is the regime switching models (see, for e.g., Turner et al. 1989; Maheu and McCurdy 2000; Ang and Bekaert 2002; Guidolin and Timmermann 2005; recently, Tu 2006 among others).

  2. For the purpose of the present work, we define an I(0) process as a covariance stationary process with spectral density that is positive and finite at the zero frequency.

  3. Excellent surveys of fractionally integrated models can be found in Beran (1994), Baillie (1996) and Robinson (2003).

  4. See Velasco (1999) and more recently, Phillips and Shimotsu (2004, 2005) for further refinements of this procedure.

  5. The sample period before the burst of the IT bubble covers from January 3rd, 1994 to March 10th, 2000 yielding 1,614 observations, and the period after the burst of the bubble covers from March 11th, 2000 to October 16th, 2002 yielding 678 observations. The second subsample ends on October 2002 when the Nasdaq index presents a local minimum after the burst of the IT bubble. Thus, though only two and a half years are employed in the second subsample, it is sufficiently large (678 observations) to examine long range dependence.

  6. The methods employed in the article are robust against non-Gaussian disturbances.

  7. In the tests of Robinson (1994), we test H 0:d = d 0, with d 0-values from 0 to 2, with 0.001 increments.

  8. Some papers that find similar evidence of long memory in the volatility processes are Granger and Ding (1995a, b), Cavalcante and Assaf (2004).

  9. If they are white noise, the estimates of d are greater after the bubble for the DJIA and S&P indices with the absolute returns and for the S&P index with the squared returns.

  10. A very similar break-date was obtained when using other break-date detection methods based on non-fractional models (Andrews 1993, 2003; Kurozumi 2005).

  11. Confidence intervals for the break-date estimates are not computed. They can be obtained via bootstrapping though it is highly computationally intensive.

References

  • Andrews DWK (1993) Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica 61:821–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DWK (2003) Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. A corrigendum. Econometrica 71:395–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang A, Bekaert G (2002) International asset allocation with regime shifts. Rev Financ Stud 15:1137–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydogan K, Booth GG (1988) Are there long cycles in common stock returns? South Econ J 55:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J, Perron P (1998) Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica 66:47–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillie RT (1996) Long memory processes and fractional integration in econometrics. J Econom 73:5–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkoulas JT, Baum CF (1996) Long term dependance in stock returns. Econ Lett 53:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkoulas JT, Baum CF, Travlos N (2000) Long memory in the Greek stock market. Appl Financ Econ 10:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beran J (1994) Statistics for long memory processes. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beran J, Terrin N (1996) Testing for a change of the long memory parameter. Biometrika 83:627–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev T, Wright JH (2000) High frequency data, frequency domain inference and volatility forecasting. Rev Econ Stat 83:596–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos C, Franses PH, Ooms M (2001) Inflation, forecast intervals and long memory regression models. Int J Forecast 18:243–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bry G, Boschan C (1971) Cyclical analysis of time series: selected procedures and computer programs. NBER, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JY, Lettau M, Malkiel BG, Xu X (2001) Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. J Finance 56:1–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcante J, Assaf A (2004) Long range dependence in the returns and volatility of the Brazilian stock market. Eur Rev Econ Finance 3:5–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers M (1998) Long memory and aggregation in macroeconomic time series. Int Econ Rev 39:1053–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chordia T, Roll R, Subrahmanyam A (2001) Market liquidity and trading volume. J Finance LVI:501–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cioczek-George R, Mandelbrot BB (1995) A class of micropulses and anti persistent fractional Brownian motion. Stoch Process Appl 60:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter J (2005) Uncovering long memory in high frequency UK futures. Eur J Finance 11:325–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crato N (1994) Some international evidence regarding the stochastic behaviour of stock returns. Appl Financ Econ 4:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold FX, Inoue A (2001) Long memory and regime switching. J Econom 105:131–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Z, Granger CWJ, Engle RF (1993) A long memory property of stock markets and a new model. J Empir Finance 1:83–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards S, Gomez Biscarri J, Perez de Gracia F (2003) Stock market cycles, financial liberalization and volatility. J Int Money Finance 22:925–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder J, Jin HJ (2007) Long memory in commodity futures volatility: a wavelet perspective. J Futures Mark 27:411–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Smith AD (1999) Stochastic permanent breaks. Rev Econ Stat 81:553–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García del Barrio P, Gil-Alana LA (2007) Unemployment persistente in Spain. Time series and panel data approaches using disaggregated data. Appl Econ 38:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geweke J, Porter-Hudak S (1983) The estimation and application of long memory time series models. J Time Ser Anal 4:221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Alana LA (2000) Fractional integration in the purchasing power parity. Econ Lett 69:285–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Alana LA (2003) Fractional integration in the volatility of asset returns. Eur Rev Econ Finance 2:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Alana LA (2005) Long memory in daily absolute and squared returns in the Spanish stock market. Adv Invest Anal Portf Manag 1:198–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Alana LA (2006) Fractional integration in daily stock market indices. Rev Financ Econ 15:28–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Alana LA (2008) Fractional integration and structural breaks at unknown periods of time. J Time Ser Anal 29:163–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Alana LA, Robinson PM (1997) Testing of unit roots and other nonstationary hypotheses in macroeconomic time series. J Econom 80:241–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Alana LA, Cunado J, Perez de Gracia F (2008) Stochastic volatility in the Spanish stock market. A long memory model with a structural break. Eur J Finance 14:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez Biscarri J, Perez de Gracia F (2004) Stock market cycles and stock market development in Spain. Span Econ Rev 6:127–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez L, Powell JG, Shi J, Wilson A (2005) Two centuries of bull and bear market cycles. Int Rev Econ Finance 14:469–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ (1980) Long memory relationships and the aggregation of dynamic models. J Econom 14:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Ding Z (1995a) Some properties of absolute returns. An alternative measure of risk. Ann Econ Stat 40:67–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Ding Z (1995b) Stylized facts on the temporal and distributional properties of daily data from speculative markets. Working Paper, UCSD

  • Granger CWJ, Ding Z (1996) Varieties of long memory models. J Econom 73:61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Hyung N (2004) Occasional structural breaks and long memory with an application to the S&P 500 absolute stock returns. J Empir Finance 11:399–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene MT, Fielitz BD (1977) Long term dependence in common stock returns. J Financ Econ 5:339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan A (1996) Minutes of the federal open market commitee. www.federalreserve.gov/transcript/1996/19960924meeting.pdf

  • Guidolin M, Timmermann A (2005) Economic implications of the bull and bear regimes in UK stock and bond returns. Econ J 115:111–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry OT (2002) Long memory in stock returns: some international evidence. Appl Financ Econ 12:725–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiemstra C, Jones JD (1997) Another look at long memory in common stock returns. J Empir Finance 29:373–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CP, Walker MD, Wilson JW (2004) Analyzing stock market volatility using extreme day measures. J Financ Res 27:585–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurozumi E (2005) Detection of structural change in the long run persistence in a univariate time series. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 67:181–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo AW (1991) Long term memory in stock prices. Econometrica 59:1279–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobato IN, Savin NE (1998) Real and spurious long memory properties of stock market data. J Bus Econ Stat 16:261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheu JM, McCurdy TH (2000) Identifying bull and bear markets in stock returns. J Bus Econ Stat 18:100–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1971) When can price be arbitraged efficiently? A limit to the validity of the random walk and martingale models. Rev Econ Stat 53:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marelli E (2004) Evolution of unemployment structures and regional specialization in the EU. Econ Syst 28:35–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishina K, Maghrebi N, Holmes MJ (2006) Are volatility expectations characterized by regime shifts? Evidence from implied volatility indices. Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 06–20

  • Ohanissian A, Russell JR, Tsay RS (2008) True or spurious long memory? A new test. J Bus Econ Stat 26:161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parke WR (1999) What is fractional integration? Rev Econ Stat 81:632–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Shimotsu K (2004) Local Whittle estimation in nonstationary and unit root cases. Ann Stat 32:656–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Shimotsu K (2005) Exact local Whittle estimation of fractional integration. Ann Stat 33:1890–1933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PM (1978) Statistical inference for a random coefficient autoregressive model. Scand J Stat 5:163–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PM (1994) Efficient tests of nonstationary hypotheses. J Am Stat Assoc 89:1420–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PM (1995) Gaussian semiparametric estimation of long range dependence. Ann Stat 23:1630–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PM (2003) Long memory time series. In: Robinson PM (ed) Time series with long memory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadique S, Silvapulle P (2001) Long term memory in stock market returns: international evidence. Int J Finance Econ 6:59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwert GW (1998) Stock market volatility: 10 years after the crash. Brook-Wharton Pap Financ Serv I:65–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller RJ (2001) Irrational exuberance. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibbertsen P (2004) Long memory in volatilities of German stock returns. Empir Econ 29:477–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowell F (1992) Maximum likelihood estimation of stationary univariate fractionally integrated time series models. J Econom 53:165–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taqqu MS, Willinger W, Sherman R (1997) Proof of a fundamental result in self-similar traffic modelling. Comp Commun Rev 27:5–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teverosky V, Taqqu MS (1997) Testing for long range dependence in the presence of shifting means or slowly decaying trend using a variance-type estimator. J Time Ser Anal 18:279–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolvi J (2003) Long memory model in a small economy. Econ Bull 7:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu J (2006) Are bull and bear markets economically important? Mimeo

  • Turner CM, Startz R, Nelson CR (1989) A markov model of heteroscedasticity, risk and learning in the stock market. J Financ Econ 25:3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasco C (1999) Gaussian semiparametric estimation of nonstationary time series. J Time Ser Anal 20:87–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yajima Y (1985) Estimation of long memory time series models. Aust J Stat 27:303–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank the editor and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and constructive suggestions on the paper. Juncal Cunado and Luis A. Gil-Alana gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology (SEJ2005-07657/ECON). Fernando Perez de Gracia acknowledges research support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology and FEDER through Grant SEJ2005-06302/ECON and from the Plan Especial de Investigacion de la Universidad de Navarra.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Perez de Gracia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cuñado, J., Gil-Alana, L.A. & de Gracia, F.P. US stock market volatility persistence: evidence before and after the burst of the IT bubble. Rev Quant Finan Acc 33, 233–252 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-009-0111-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-009-0111-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation