Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Existential-Hayatological Theism

  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the oldest conceptions of theology is discourse of the poets about the gods and its philosophical interpretation. Judaism and Christianity borrowed this Greek understanding of theology and revised it only slightly to reflect its own monotheistic vision of God and God’s relations to and with the world of nature and human existence. The question as to which philosophy best explicates and justifies the oral and written mythopoetic discourse of the imaginative bards of Israel and the early Christian community became a fundamental issue and has remained so through the centuries. The aim of this essay is to explore this question once again in the context of post-liberal theology in general, the works of Abraham Heschel, Claude Tresmontant, and the Japanese theologian Tetsaturo Ariga on an implicit biblical philosophy and the explicit metaphysical theism of Alfred North Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne. The outcome of this exploration will be a rational reconstruction or ideal type of neo-classical theism or what I have chosen to call existential-hayatological theism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan G., Allshouse M.F., eds. (2005). Nature, truth, and value: Exploring the thinking of Frederick Ferre. New York, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston W.P. (1989). Divine nature and human language. Ithaca, Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson B.W. (1953). The unfolding drama of the Bible. New York, Association Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariga T. (1984). Being and Haya (Trans. Jan Van Bragt). Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 11(2–3): 267–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers R.H. (1976). Tertullian’s ‘Paradox’. The Expository Times 87(l0): 308–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cailliet E. (1953). The Christian approach to culture. New York, Abingdon-Cokesbury Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherbonnier E., La B. (1955). Hardness of heart. Garden City, New York, Doubleday & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke B.L. (1992). Identity and the Divinities. International Journal forPhilosophy of Religion 31(2–3): 133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb Jr. J. B., Pinnock C.H., eds. (2000). Searching for an adequate God. Grand Rapids, Michigan, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris J.F., ed. (1992). Logic, God and metaphysics. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne C. (1962). The logic of perfection. LaSalle, Illinois, Open Court

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasker W. (1983). Metaphysics: Constructing a world view. Downers Grove, IL, Inter Varsity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugh of St. Victor (l961). The didascalicon of Hugh of St. Victor (Translated by Jerome Taylor). New York, Columbia University Press

  • Hume D. (1957). Dialogues concerning natural religion. New York, Hafner

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly J.N.D. (1990). Early Christian doctrine (4th edn.). London, Adam & Charles Black

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick F.G. (1994). Together bound. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy A.O. (1936). The great chain of being. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R.M. (1973). On the logical structure of the ontological argument. The Monist 57(3): 297

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalson C. (1960). Japanese contributions to Christian theology. Philadelphia, Westminster Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalson C. (1967). Worldly theology. New York, Charles Scribner’s Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris T.V. (1991). Our idea of God. Downers Grove, IL, Inter Varsity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Power W.L. (1984). The doctrine of the Trinity and Whitehead’s metaphysics. Encounter 45(4), 287–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Power W.L. (1988). Literal and metaphorical uses of discourse in the representation of God. The Thomist 52(4): 627–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Power W.L. (1997). Imago Dei-Imitatio Dei. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42(3): 131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prestige G.L. (1952). God in patristic thought. London, S.P.C.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R.G. (1970). The doctrine of God. Philadelphia, The Westminster Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillich P. (1955). The shaking of the foundations. New York, Charles Scribner’s Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead A.N. (1926). Religion in the making. New York, The Macmillan Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead A.N. (1933). Adventures of ideas. New York, The Macmillan Company

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Religion, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA

    William L. Power

Authors
  1. William L. Power
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William L. Power.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Power, W.L. Existential-Hayatological Theism. Int J Philos Relig 61, 181–198 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9121-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9121-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation