Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Economics at the FTC: Retrospective Merger Analysis with a Focus on Hospitals

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economists at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) support the agency’s competition and consumer protection missions. In this year’s essay we discuss efforts at the FTC and elsewhere to examine empirically the competitive effects of mergers. This work has ranged from subjective interview-based reports on post-merger behavior to more objective analyses of post-merger performance based on rigorous empirical analysis of prices. In this essay we discuss the merger retrospective literature generally, and focus on the FTC staff’s recent empirical analyses of consummated hospital mergers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashenfelter, O. C., & Hosken, D. S. (2010). The effect of mergers on consumer prices: Evidence from five mergers on the enforcement margin. Journal of Law & Economics (forthcoming).

  • Ashenfelter O., Hosken D. S., Weinberg M. (2009) Generating evidence to guide merger enforcement. Competition Policy International 5(1): 57–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker J. B. (2009) Efficiencies and high concentration: Heinz proposes to acquire Beech-Nut. In: Kwoka J. E., White L. J. (eds) The antitrust revolution: Economics, competition, and policy. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Balan, D. J., & Brand, K. J. (2009). Simulating hospital merger simulations. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/david_balan/7.

  • Barton D. M., Sherman R. (1984) The price and profit effects of horizontal merger: A case study. Journal of Industrial Economics 33: 165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biscourp, P., Boutin, X., & Vergé, T. (2008). The effects of retail regulations on prices: Evidence from the Loi Galland. Institut National De La Statistique Et Des Études Économiques

  • Breen D. A. (2004) The Union Pacific/Southern Pacific rail merger: A retrospective on merger benefits. The Review of Network Economics 3(3): 283–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Capps C., Dranove D., Satterthwaite M. (2003) Competition and market power in options markets. RAND Journal of Economics 34: 737–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton D. W. (2009) Why we need to measure the effect of merger policy and how to do it. Competition Policy International 5(1): 76–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, V. (2009). The evolution of the baby food industry 2000–2008. Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission, Working Paper # 297.

  • Coate, M. B., & Heimert, A. J. (2009). Merger efficiencies at the Federal Trade Commission 1997–2007. Retrieved from Federal Trade Commission website http://www.ftc.gov/os/2009/02/0902mergerefficiencies.pdf.

  • Cooper J., Froeb L., O’Brien D., Vita M. (2005) Vertical antitrust policy as a problem of inference. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23: 639–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission., Buccirossi, P., Ciari, L., Duso, T., Fridolfsson, S., Spagnolo, G., & Vitale, C. (2006). Ex-post review of merger control decisions. Laboritorio di economica, antitrust, regolamentazione (Lear) for the European Commission’s DG Competition.

  • Elzinga K. G., Hogarty T. F. (1974) The problem of geographic market delineation in antimerger suits. Antitrust Bulletin 18: 45–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (2008). Antitrust evaluation of horizontal mergers: An economic alternative to market definition. Working Paper presented at Federal Trade Commission/Northwestern University microeconomics conference, November 2008.

  • Gaynor M., Vogt W. B. (2003) Competition among hospitals. RAND Journal of Economics 34(4): 764–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office. (2004). The effects of mergers and market concentration in the US petroleum industry. Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Committee on Governmental Affairs, US Senate, United States General Accounting Office.

  • Haas-Wilson, D., & Garmon, C. (2009). Two hospital mergers on Chicago’s North Shore: A retrospective study. Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission, Working Paper # 294.

  • Hunter G., Leonard G. K., Olley G. S. (2008) Merger retrospective studies: A review. Antitrust 23(1): 34–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbens G.W., Wooldridge J.M. (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature 47(1): 5–86 (especially 67–70)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito P. M. (1991) Resale price maintenance: Empirical evidence from litigation. Journal of Law & Economics 34: 263–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito P. M., Overstreet T. R. (1996) Resale price maintenance: An economic assessment of the Federal Trade Commission’s case against the corning glass works. Journal of Law & Economics 39: 285–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer B. (1995) Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 13: 151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muris, T. J. (2002). Everything old is new again: Health care and competition in the 21st century. Prepared remarks at the 7th Annual competition in health care forum, Chicago, November 2.

  • Pautler P. A. (2003) Evidence on mergers and acquisitions. Antitrust Bulletin 48: 119–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters C. (2006) Evaluating the performance of merger simulations: Evidence from the US airline industry. Journal of Law & Economics 49: 627–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson T. J., Posner R. A. (2009) Antitrust in the not-for-profit sector. Journal of Law & Economics 52(1): 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prager R. A., Hannan T. H. (1998) Do substantial horizontal mergers generate significant price effects? Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Industrial Economics 46: 433–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richman B. D. (2007) Antitrust and nonprofit hospital mergers: A return to basics. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 156: 121–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, L., Rogers, R. P., & Reitzes, J. D. (1992). Case studies of the price effects of horizontal mergers. Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Economics

  • Simpson J., Taylor C. T. (2008) Do gasoline mergers affect consumers’ prices: The Marathon-Ashland and UDS transaction. Journal of Law & Economics 51(1): 135–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. (1990). Report from official Washington. Prepared remarks before the American bar association. March, pp. 10–16.

  • Taylor C. T., Hosken D. S. (2007) The economic effects of the Marathon-Ashland joint venture: The importance of industry supply shocks and vertical market structure. Journal of Industrial Economics 55(3): 421–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. T., Kreisle, N., & Zimmerman, P. R. (2007). Vertical relationships and competition in retail gasoline markets: Comment. FTC Bureau of Economics, Working Paper # 291 (Accepted by AER April 2009, forthcoming 2009 or 2010).

  • Tenn, S. (2008). The price effects of hospital mergers: A case study of the Sutter-Summit transaction. Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission, Working Paper # 293.

  • Thompson, A. (2009). The effect of hospital mergers on inpatient prices: A case study of the New Hanover-Cape Fear transaction. Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Economics, Working Paper # 295.

  • UK Office of Fair Trading. (2008). An evaluation of the impact upon productivity of ending resale price maintenance on books. Report prepared for the OFT by the Centre for Competition Policy at University of East Anglia.

  • UK Office of Fair Trading., & Competition Commission. (2005). Ex-post evaluation of mergers. March, 2005. Morrison & Elliot of PricewaterhouseCoopers. Retrieved from http://www.oft.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/4E8F41F9-5D96-4CD4-8965-8DDA26A64DA8/0/oft767.pdf.

  • UK Office of Fair Trading, Competition Commission, Dept. For Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR), Deloitte LLP, and Steve Davies (University of East Anglia). (2009, March 18), Review of merger decisions under the Enterprise Act 2002.

  • Vita M. G., Sacher S. (2001) The competitive effects of not-for-profit hospital mergers: A case study. Journal of Industrial Economics 49(1): 63–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, M., & Hosken, D. (2008). Using mergers to test a model of oligopoly. Retrieved from http://www.ftc.gov/be/workshops/microeconomics/docs/weinberg.pdf.

  • Weinberg M. (2008) The price effects of horizontal mergers. Journal of Competition Law & Economics 4: 433–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werden G. J., Froeb L. M. (1994) The effects of mergers in differentiated products industries: Logit demand and merger policy. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 10: 407–426

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Economics, 600 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Washington, DC, 20580, USA

    Joseph Farrell, Paul A. Pautler & Michael G. Vita

Authors
  1. Joseph Farrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul A. Pautler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael G. Vita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Farrell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farrell, J., Pautler, P.A. & Vita, M.G. Economics at the FTC: Retrospective Merger Analysis with a Focus on Hospitals. Rev Ind Organ 35, 369–385 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-009-9231-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-009-9231-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation