Abstract
This paper analyses the cost structure of a sample of local public transport companies operating in medium and large urban centres in Italy in order to identify the proper network configuration for the service. Technological characteristics of public transit systems are analysed by estimating both variable and total cost function models. The evidence shows the presence of short-run and long-run economies of scale, as well as of economies of network density. This suggests that a suitable network design should at least include a large urban centre, while a regulatory policy aimed at fragmenting the served area would imply an efficiency loss.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrate, G., Piacenza, M., & Vannoni, D. (2007). The impact of integrated tariff systems on public transport demand: Evidence from Italy. HERMES Working Paper, 2.
Berechman J. (1987). Cost structure and production technology in transit: An application to Israeli bus transit sector. Regional Science and Urban Economics 17: 519–534
Bhattacharyya A., Kumbhakar S.C. and Bhattacharyya A. (1995). Ownership structure and cost efficiency: A study of publicly owned passenger-bus transportation companies in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis 6: 47–61
Cambini C. and Filippini M. (2003). Competitive tendering and optimal size in the regional bus transportation industry: An example from Italy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 74(1): 163–182
Caves D.W., Christensen L.R. and Swanson J.A. (1981). Productivity growth, scale economies and capacity utilization in U. S. railroads. American Economic Review 71: 994–1002
Caves D.W., Christensen L.R., Tretheway M.W. and Windle R. (1985). Network effects and the measurement of returns to scale and density for U.S. railroads. In: Daughety, A. (eds) Analytical studies in transport economics, pp 97–120. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Christensen L.R. and Greene W.H. (1976). Economies of scale in U.S. electric power generation. Journal of Political Economy 84(4): 655–676
Dalen D.M. and Gomez-Lobo A. (2003). Yardsticks on the road: Regulatory contracts in the Norwegian bus industry. Transportation 30: 371–386
Fabbri D. (1998). La stima di frontiere di costo nel trasporto pubblico locale: una rassegna e un’applicazione. Economia Pubblica 3: 55–94
Farsi M., Filippini M., Küenzle and M. (2006a). Cost efficiency in regional bus companies: An application of alternative stochastic frontier models. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 40(1): 95–118
Farsi, M., Fetz, A., & Filippini, M. (2006b). Economies of scale and scope in local public transportation. CEPE Working Paper No. 48.
Fazioli R., Filippini M. and Prioni P. (1993). Cost structure and efficiency of local public transport: The case of emilia Romagna bus companies. International Journal of Transport Economics 3: 305–324
Fazioli, R., Filippini, M., & Künzle, M. (2003). Valutazione dell’efficienza delle compagnieimprese di bus italiane e svizzere. In L’efficienza nei servizi pubblici (pp. 175–214). Roma: Banca d’Italia.
Filippini M. (1996). Economies of scale and utilization in the swiss electric power distribution industry. Applied Economics 28: 543–550
Filippini M. and Prioni P. (1994). Is scale and cost inefficiency in the Swiss Bus Industry a Regulatory Problem? Evidence from a Frontier Cost Approach. Journal of the Economics of Business 1: 219–231
Filippini M. and Prioni P. (2003). The influence of ownership on the cost of bus service provision in Switzerland. An Empirical Illustration. Applied Economics 35(6): 683–690
Fraquelli G., Piacenza M. and Abrate G. (2004). Regulating public transit networks: How do urban-intercity diversification and speed-up measures affect firms’ cost performance?. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 75(2): 193–225
Gagnepain P. (1998). Structures productives de l’Industrie du transport Urbain et effets des schemas reglementaires. Economie et Prevision 135: 95–107
Gagnepain P. and Ivaldi M. (2002). Incentive regulatory policies: The case of public transit systems in France. RAND Journal of Economics 33(4): 605–629
Jha R. and Singh S.K. (2001). Small is efficient: A frontier approach to cost inefficiencies in Indian state road transport undertakings. International Journal of Transport Economics 28(1): 95–114
Karlaftis M.G. and McCarthy P. (2002). Cost structures of public transit systems: A panel data analysis. Transportation Research - Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 38: 1–18
Levaggi R. (1994). Parametric and non-parametric approach to efficiency: The case of urban transport in Italy. Studi Economici 49(53): 67–88
Matas A. and Raymond J.L. (1998). Technical characteristics and efficiency of Urban bus companies: The case of Spain. Transportation 25: 243–263
Piacenza M. (2006). Regulatory contracts and cost efficiency: Stochastic frontier evidence from the Italian local public transport. Journal of Productivity Analysis 25(3): 257–277
Wang Chiang J.-S.-E.W. and Chen Y.-W. (2005). Cost structure and technological change of local public transport: The Kaohsiung city bus case. Applied Economics 37: 1399–1410
Windle R.J. (1998). Transit policy and the cost structure of Urban bus transportation. In: Dogson, J.S. and Topham, N. (eds) Bus Deregulation and Privatization, Aldershot, Averbury
Zellner A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR) and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 57: 348–368
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cambini, C., Piacenza, M. & Vannoni, D. Restructuring Public Transit Systems: Evidence on Cost Properties from Medium and Large-Sized Companies. Rev Ind Organ 31, 183–203 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-007-9153-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-007-9153-9
Keywords
- Public transit systems
- Regulation
- Network configuration
- Scale and density economies
- Variable and total cost function