Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Enforcement and Control of Piracy, Copying, and Sharing in the Movie Industry

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We review strategies that movie distributors have used to cope with piracy, copying, and sharing of movies in the United States in four categories: “hard goods” commercial piracy, consumer theft of pay TV signals, consumer copying and sharing of videos and pay TV, and (mostly in prospect) Internet file sharing. In the past, distributors have mainly sought to raise costs of engaging in these activities by increasing legal jeopardy, advantaging anti-copy technology, and reducing original sources of supply. They appear to have effectively reduced or contained most piracy, copying, and sharing of movies in the U.S., at least with analog media. Movie distributors are following similar strategies with digital media, including Internet file sharing. Digital media raise the stakes because of lower costs of copying or sharing and higher quality of outputs. Digital outputs are not always as high quality as source originals, however, and digital rights management (DRM) technologies potentially improve distributor control. The movie studios now face technological, demand, and political uncertainties in the U.S., notably in maintaining or achieving technically compatible DRM systems to control file sharing and PPV/VOD copying. Implications for foreign markets and directions for research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, N. (2007). An exploration of rights management technologies used in the music industry. Retrieved June 24 from, http://bciptf.org/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=30 .

  • Andrés A.R. (2006). The relationship between copyright software protection and piracy: Evidence from Europe. European Journal of Law and Economics 21:29–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, T. K., & Landreth, J. (2006). WHV China plan: Pre-empt piracy. The Hollywood Reporter.

  • Banerjee D., Khalid A.M., Sturm J.-E. (2005). Socio-economic development and software piracy. An empirical assessment. Applied Economics 37(18):2091–2097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belkin, L. (1987). On the trail of pirated video cassettes. NYT, p. C13.

  • Bergemann, D., Eisenbach, T., Reigenbaum, J., & Shenker, S. (2005). Flexibility as an instrument in digital rights management. Cowles foundation discussion paper no. 1505. Retrieved June 25, 2007, fromhttp://cowles.econ.yale.edu/P/cd/dy2005.htm.

  • Berkowitz, H. (2002). Cablevision sued: Customer accused of piracy fights back. Newsday, p. A56.

  • Besek, J. M. (2004). Anti-circumvention laws and copyright: A report from the Kernochan Center for Law. Media and the Arts. Columbia Journal of Law & Arts, 385.

  • Besen S.M. (1986). Private copying, reproduction costs, and the supply of intellectual property. Information Economics and Policy 2:5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besen S.M., Kirby S.N. (1989). Private copying, appropriability, and optimal copying royalties. Journal of Law and Economics 32:255–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjee S., Gopal R.D., Lertwachara K., Marsden J. (2006). Impact of legal threats on individual behavior: An analysis of music industry actions and online music sharing. Journal of Law and Economics 49(1):91–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bounie, D., Bourreau, M., & Waelbroeck, P. (2006). Piracy and demands for films: Analysis of piracy behavior in French universities. Working paper, retrieved April 5, 2007, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=936049.

  • Byers S., Cranor L., Korman D., McDaniel P., Cronin E. (2004). Analysis of security vulnerabilities in the movie production and distribution process. Telecommunications Policy 28(8):619–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coco, D. (1990). The ‘Get up and Go’ of Go-Video; Small company takes on alleged japanese cartel and introduces dual-deck VCR. EDN, 35, Issue 24A.

  • Conner K.R., Rumelt R.P. (1991). Software piracy: A strategic analysis of protection. Management Science 37:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coral Consortium website from http://www.coral-interop.org.

  • Consumer Electronics Association. (2006). Comments on NCTA Downloadable Security Report, FCC CS Docket 97–80, at 3.

  • Cowie, C., & Kapur, S. (2005). The management of digital rights in pay-TV. Birkbeck University of London. Retrieved, Jun 04, 2007, from http://ideas.repec.org/p/bbk/bbkefp/0510.html.

  • Currah A. (2006) Hollywood versus the internet: The media and entertainment industries in a digital and networked economy. Journal of Economic Geography 6(4):439–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C&R Research. (2004). Evaluation of signal theft. (Prepared by C&R Research Services, Inc. December 21, 2004) #14322 & 14469.

  • Davis, J. (2005). Echostar deals smarter cards; Security swap-out aimed at sinking satellite-TV pirates. Rocky Mountain News.

  • Dell. (2006). Blu-ray disc next-generation optical storage: protecting content on the BD-ROM. retrieved June 06, 2007, from http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/vectors/brcp.pdf.

  • De Vany A.S., Eckert R.D. (1991). Motion pictures antitrust: The paramount case revisited. Research in Law and Economics 14:51–112

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vany, A. S., & Walls, W. D. (2007). The effects of movie piracy at the box office. Review of Industrial Organization (forthcoming)

  • Digital Transmission Licensing Administrator website from http://www.dtcp.com.

  • Dixon, D. (2005). Content protection—what video and DVD producers should know about video content protection. Digital Video Magazine.

  • FCC (2007). Compatibility of cable TV and digital TV receivers—“Plug and Play.” Retrieved June 25, 2007, from http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/plugandplaytv.pdf.

  • FCC (2003). Commercial availability of navigation devices and compatibility between cable systems and consumer electronics equipment, FCC CS Docket No. 97–80 and PP Docket No. 006–7.

  • Frank N. Magid Associates, INC (2005). National Cable & Telecommunications Association: 2004 Survey of cable theft, from http://web.ncta.com/staw/Page.php?PageID=21.

  • Frankel D. (2003). Study: Losses from illegal copying mount. Video Business. CES Pub. Co. New York, N.Y

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayer A., Shy O. (2005). Digital copyright in the digital age. CESfifo Economic Studies 51:477–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendel, M. (1986). Pay-cable services try a ‘VCR-friendly’ tack. Los Angeles Times, p. 1.

  • Gillespie, G., Moore, J., & Littleton, D. (1995). Cable decoder piracy white paper update: A summary of federal law in the cable industry’s anti-piracy arsenal. (paper prepared for Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.).

  • Gopal R.D., Sudip B., Lawrence Sanders G. (2006). Do artists benefit from online music sharing? Journal of Business 79(4):1503–1534

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh, R., & Khemka, R. (2001). Does copyright enforcement encourage piracy? Working paper, Dept. of Economics, Claremont Colleges from http://econ.claremontmckenna.edu/papers/2000–14.pdf.

  • Harmetz, A. (1985). ‘Cotton Club’ cassettes coded to foil pirates. N.Y. Times, at C15.

  • Harmon, A. (2003). Hollywood goes digital. San Diego Union Tribune, p. A-1.

  • Healey, J. (2001). Digital technologies could limit recording; TV: Studios and broadcasters hope for protection, narrowing the scope of personal use taping. Los Angeles Times, p. C5.

  • Hefflinger, M. (2007). Report: Online video streams Up 38.8% in 2006 to 24.9 Billion. DigitalMediaWire, from http://www.dmwmedia.com/news/2007/03/06/report-online-video-streams-up-38-8-in-2006-to-24-9-billion .

  • Holm H.J. (2003). Can economic theory explain piracy behavior? Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy 3(1):70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, K. -L. & Png, I. (2003). Piracy and the legitimate demand for recorded music. Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, 2(1).

  • International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA). (2007). International Intellectual Property Alliance 2007 Special 301 Report. Retrieved May 22, 2007, from http://www.iipa.com/ 2007_SPEC301_TOC.htm.

  • Intel (n.d.) Protecting premium content and its use in the digital home. Retrieved June 25, 2007, from http://www.intel.com/standards/case/case_dtcp.htm.

  • Johnson J., Waldman M. (2005). The limits of indirect appropriability in markets for copyable goods. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues 2(1):19–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan Research. (2002), Motion Picture Investor, Dec, 23, 2002.

  • Kagan Research. (2005), Motion Picture Investor, May 11, 2005.

  • Kagan Research. (2006a), Motion Picture Investor, May 23, 2006.

  • Kagan Research. (2006b), Motion Picture Investor, Aug 11, 2006.

  • Kagan Research. (2007), Motion Picture Investor, Jan 19, 2007.

  • Keough, C. (2001). DirecTV gets aggressive on signals theft. Los Angeles Business Journal, p. 14.

  • Kharif, O. (2004). What plug-and-play means for TV. Business Week.

  • King S.P., Lampe R. (2003). Network externalities, price discrimination and profitable piracy. Information Economics and Policy 15:271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kini R.B., Rominger A., Vijayaraman B.S. (2000). An empirical study of software piracy and moral intensity among university students. Journal of Computer Information Systems 40(3):627–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein B., Lerner A.V., Murphy K.M. (2002). The economics of copyright “Fair Use” in a networked world. American Economic Review 92(2):205–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labaton, S. (2005). Antipiracy rule for broadcasts is struck down. NYT, p. 1.

  • Lessig L. (2004). Free culture: The nature and future of creativity. New York, Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D. (2002). Millions of pirates are plundering satellite TV. USA Today, p. 1A.

  • Liebowitz S.J. (1985). Copying and indirect appropriability: Photocopying of journals. Journal of Political Economy 93:945–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, S. J. (2006a). Economists’ topsy-turvy view of piracy, 2 Rev. Econ. Res. on Copyright Issues, 5–17.

  • Liebowitz S.J. (2006b). File sharing: Creative destruction or just plain destruction? Journal of Law and Economics 49(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litman J. (2001). Digital copyright : Protecting intellectual property on the internet. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macrovision Corp. (1990). Video rentals and video copying: A national survey of VCR owners: Executive summary, (prepared by Schulman, Ronca & Bucuvalas, Inc.).

  • Macrovision Corp. (1993). Home taping in America: The second national survey of VCR owners, Summary report. (prepared by Schulman, Ronca, and Bucuvalas, 1993)

  • Macrovision Corp. (1996a). Pay-per-view movie piracy and taping in the home video market. (Chilton Research Services).

  • Macrovision Corp. (1996b). Home taping in America: The third national survey of VCR owners, Summary of findings (prepared by Schulman, Ronca, and Bucuvalas, October 1996), p. 11.

  • Macrovision Corp. (2000) Home taping in America—how high is the risk of consumer copying?. (presentation to the VSDA, April 2000).

  • Mook, B. (2007). Stealing cable? SSI is on the case, Denver Business Journal, May 18, 2007.

  • Mortimer, J. H. (2002). The effects of revenue-sharing contracts on welfare in vertically-separated markets: Evidence from the video rental industry. Manuscript, Dept. of Economics, Harvard University.

  • Motavalli, J. (2004). Pay cables fear DVD burn. Television Week, p. 1.

  • MPA (2005) U.S. piracy fact sheet. Retrieved June 20, 2007 from http://www.mpaa.org/piracy.asp .

  • MPA and LEK (2006). 2005 Piracy data summary [electronic version]. Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA). Retrieved May 22, 2007, from http://www.mpaa.org/2006_05_03leksumm.pdf.

  • Mussa M., Rosen S. (1978). Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic Theory 18:301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCTA. (1992). Fifth annual signal security ideas competition.

  • NCTA. (1996a). Signal security handbook.

  • NCTA. (1996b). Ninth annual signal security ideas competition.

  • Nelson, R. A., Reid, C. E., & Gilmore, O. (2007). Out-of-market gap for DVDs. Review of Industrial Organization (forthcoming)

  • Oberholzer-Gee F., Stumpf K. (2007). The effect of file sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis. Journal of Political Economy 115(1):1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen B., Wildman S. (1992). Video economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., & Scotchmer, S. (2006). Digital rights management and the pricing of digital products. NBER Working Paper w11532. Retrieved May 22, 2007, from http://socrates. berkeley.edu/~scotch/w11532.pdf.

  • Peitz M., Waelbroek P. (2006a), Piracy of digital products: A critical review of the theoretical literature. Information Economics & Policy 18: 449–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peitz M., Waelbroek P. (2006b). Why the music industry may gain from free downloading—The role of sampling. International Journal of Industrial Organization 24(5):907–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perenson, M. J. (2007). Blu-ray, HD-DVD managed copy nearing reality, PC World. Retrieved Jun 06, 2007, from http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,132229-,dvdtechnology/article.html1.

  • RIAA (annual). Yearend market report on U.S. Recorded music shipments [electronic version], 1997 to 2007 reports retrieved May 19, 2007, from http://www.riaa.com/news/marketingdata/yearend.asp.

  • RIAA (n.d.). 1990-99 U.S. manufacturers unit shipments and value chart [electronic version], Retrieved May 19, 2007, from http://www.riaa.com/news/marketingdata/facts.asp .

  • Rob R., Waldfogel J. (2006a). Piracy on the high C’s: Music downloading, sales displacement, and social welfare in a sample of college students. Journal of Law and Economics 49(1):29–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rob, R.,& Waldfogel, J. (2006b) Piracy on the silver screen, NBERWorking Paper Series,Working Paper 12010. Retreived May 3, 2007 from http://www.nber.rog/papers/w12010.

  • Rothchild, J. (2005). Economic analysis of technological protection measures. 84 Oregon L. Rev., 489.

  • Screen Digest. (2003). Screen Digest Ltd. London, Eng., p. 124.

  • Screen Digest. (2005). Squeeze or Stretch?: The Cinema to DVD window in focus. London, Eng.: Screen Digest Ltd.

  • Segrave, K. (2003). Piracy in the motion picture industry. London: McFarland and Co.

  • Shim, R. (2003, September 10). FCC adopts ‘Plug and Play’ cable for TVs. CNET News.com. Retrieved June 25, 2007, from http://news.com.com/FCC+adopts+plug+and+play+cable+for+TVs/ 2100-1041_3-5074425.html.

  • Sims R.R., Cheng H.K., Teegen H. (1996). Toward a profile of student software pirates. Journal of Business Ethics 13:431–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokey N. (1979). Intertemporal price discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Economics 93:355–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeyama L.N. (1994). The welfare implications of unauthorized reproduction of intellectual property in the presence of demand network externalities. Journal of Industrial Economics 42(2):155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeyama L.N. (1997). The intertemporal consequences of unauthorized reproduction of intellectual property. Journal of Law and Economics 40(2):511–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. A., & Bock, G. M. (1983). War against pay-TV pirates heats up. U.S. News and World Report, p. 80.

  • Television Digest. (2001). Cable gets serious about theft.

  • The Economist. (2004). I want my P2P. p. 65.

  • The [Bergen, N.J.] Record. (1989). The future of the VCR.

  • Time Warner Cable (2003). Time warner cable, syracuse, New York Division, Cable and Broadband security case study: Tap audit (The Broadband & Internet Security Task Force) http://www.broadbandsecurity.bigstep.com/ , accessed October 28, 2003. (available from the authors).

  • United States Congress. (1991), Intellectual property and fast track authority: Hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks, 102nd U.S. Cong., 1st sess.

  • U.S. Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) (1989). Copyright and home copying: Technology challenges the law.

  • Umstead, R. T. (1993). Paramount windows will average 60 days. Multichannel News.

  • Umstead, R. T. (1996). MPAA eyes ban of NVOD taping. Multi-channel News.

  • Varian H.R. (1989). Price discrimination. In: Schmalensee R., Willig R. (eds). Handbook of industrial organization. Amsterdam, North-Holland Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian H.R. (2000). Buying, sharing and renting information goods. Journal of Industrial Economics 48(4):473–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian H.R. (2005). Copying and copyright. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19:121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verga, M. (2004). Super-DMCA statutes: Putting Hollywood in charge of Internet business. 4 Wake Forest Intell. Prop. L.J. 104 (May, 2004).

  • Video Business (2005). Studio execs pound away at movie piracy; Panelists also discuss day-and-date of traveling pants in China, p. 12.

  • VSDA (2000) An annual report on the home video market, 1999. Video Software Dealers Association.

  • Waterman D. (2005a). Hollywood’s road to riches. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, D. (2005b). The political economy of audio-visual copyright enforcement. Manuscript, Dept. of Telecommunications, Indiana University from http://www.indiana.edu/~telecom/faculty/waterman.html.

  • Williamson, J. M. (2005). Rights management in digital media content: A case for FCC intervention in the standardization process, 3 J. on Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 309.

  • Woolley D.J., Eining M.M. (2006). Software piracy among accounting students: A longitudinal comparison of changes and sensitivity. Journal of Information Systems 20(1):49–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentner A. (2005). File sharing and international sales of copyrighted music: An empirical analysis with a panel of countries. Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy 5(21):1–15

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Telecommunications, Indiana University, 1229 E. 7th St., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA

    David Waterman & Sung Wook Ji

  2. School of Law, Indiana University, 211 S. Indiana Ave., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA

    Laura R. Rochet

Authors
  1. David Waterman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sung Wook Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laura R. Rochet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Waterman.

Additional information

Some sections of this article draw substantially on David Waterman (2005a). Hollywood’s road to riches (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waterman, D., Ji, S.W. & Rochet, L.R. Enforcement and Control of Piracy, Copying, and Sharing in the Movie Industry. Rev Ind Organ 30, 255–289 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-007-9136-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-007-9136-x

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Search

Navigation