Skip to main content
Log in

Fuel inventory and price relationships in the U.S. electric power sector under regulatory and market change

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long-run relationships among coal inventories at U.S. electric power plants, corporate bond rates and coal, natural gas, and electricity prices are estimated over the period July 1976 to October 2014. Tests for constancy of the long-run relationships show periods of instability which coincide with major regulatory events in the electric power sector. Deregulation of the natural gas and electricity markets are likely sources of instability for the period mid-1994 to mid-2001. Additionally, inventory behavior may have had a smoothing effect over instability caused by natural gas prices during the recent U.S. shale boom. Policy makers should be aware that altering the regulatory environment can result in considerable fluctuations in how firms’ inventory decisions interact with input and output markets and opportunity costs in the long run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: U.S. EIA (2016)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As a robustness check, the empirical analysis was carried out for an alternative measure of coal inventory: current end-of-month coal on hand divided by the following month’s consumption in the previous year, \(\textit{inventory}_t=\frac{\textit{coal\;on\;hand}_t}{\textit{coal\;consumption}_{t-11}}\). The test for parameter stability is robust to this alternative measure.

References

  • American Coal Foundation. (2014). Coal energy facts. http://teachcoal.org/coal-energy-facts. Accessed February 6, 2017.

  • Arrow, K. J., Harris, T., & Marschak, J. (1951). Optimal inventory policy. Econometrica, 19(3), 250–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barmack, M., Kahn, E., & Tierney, S. J. (2007). A cost-benefit assessment of wholesale electricity restructuring and competition in New England. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 31(2), 151–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bencivenga, C., Sargenti, G., & D’Ecclesia, R. (2011). Integration of energy commodity markets in Europe and the USA. Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 4(3), 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessler, D. A., & Akleman, D. G. (1998). Farm prices, retail prices, and directed graphs: Results for pork and beef. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(5), 1145–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. S. (1986). Alternative explanations of the money-income correlation. In Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy (Vol. 25, pp. 49–99).

  • Blinder, A. S. (1986). Can the production smoothing model of inventory behavior be saved? NBER Working Paper Series No. 1257. http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/content/101/3/431.full.pdf

  • Borenstein, S., & Shepard, A. (2002). Sticky prices, inventories, and market power in wholesale gasoline markets. The Rand Journal of Economics, 33(1), 116–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Xue, W., & Yang, J. (2013). Optimal inventory policy in the presence of a long-term supplier and a spot market. Operations Research, 61(1), 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, D. M. (2003). Optimal structure identification with greedy search. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(3), 507–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine, T. J. (1997). Inventories under joint production: An empirical analysis of petroleum refining. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(3), 493–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Considine, T. J., & Heo, E. (2000). Price and inventory dynamics in petroleum product markets. Energy Economics, 22(5), 527–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culver, W. J., & Hong, M. (2016). Coal’s decling: Drive by policy or technology. The Electricity Journal, 29(7), 50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Menezes, L. M., & Houllier, M. A. (2015). Germany’s nuclear power plant closures and the integration of electricity markets in Europe. Energy Policy, 85, 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, S. M. (2000). Changes in railroad rates since the Staggers Act. Transportation Research Part E, 37, 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duangnate, K. (2015). Essays on dynamics of and forecasting ability within the U.S. Energy Sector. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Texas A&M University. College Station, TX.

  • Estima. (2006). CATS 2.0 Manual. Evanston, IL.

  • Feldstein, M., Auerbach, A., Hall, R. E., & Lovell, M. C. (1976). Inventory behavior in durable-goods manufacturing: The target-adjustment model. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 351–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W. A. (1996). Introduction to statistical time series (Vol. 428). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H., & Johansen, S. (1999). Some tests for parameter constancy in cointegrated VAR-models. The Econometrics Journal, 2(2), 306–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W. W. (2002). Electricity market restructuring: Reforms of reforms. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 21(1), 103–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C. C., Modigliani, F., & Simon, H. A. (1955). A linear decision rule for production and employment scheduling. Management Science, 2(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, K. D. (2005). Automatic inference of the contemporaneous causal order of a system of equations. Econometric Theory, 21(1), 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, B., Maccini, L., & Schuh, S. (2001). Input and output inventories. Journal of Monetary Economics, 47(2), 347–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, A. (2015). Dynamic regulatory distortions: Coal procurement at U.S Power Plants. Unpublished Working Paper. http://web.stanford.edu/akshayaj/dynamic_reg_distortion.pdf Accessed June 5, 2015.

  • Juselius, K. (2006). The cointegrated VAR model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics, 54(1), 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mjelde, J. W., & Bessler, D. A. (2009). Market integration among electricity markets and their major fuel source markets. Energy Economics, 31(3), 482–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moutinho, V., Vieira, J., & Moreira, A. C. (2011). The crucial relationship among energy commodity prices: Evidence from the Spanish Electricity Market. Energy Policy, 39(10), 5898–5908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, H. (2009). Electricity prices and fuel costs: Long-run relations and short-run dynamics. Energy Economics, 31(3), 503–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Science. (2007). Coal research and development. https://www.nap.edu/read/11977/chapter/1. Accessed February 6, 2017.

  • Panagiotidis, T., & Rutledge, E. (2007). Oil and gas markets in the UK: Evidence from a cointegrating approach. Energy Economics, 29(2), 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., Mjelde, J. W., & Bessler, D. A. (2006). Price dynamics among US electricity spot markets. Energy Economics, 28(1), 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (2000). Causality models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. (2001). The dynamics of commodity spot and futures markets: A primer. The Energy Jounal, 22(3), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. (2004). Volatility and commodity price dynamics. The Jounal of Futures Markets, 24(11), 1029–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raines, H. (1982). Reagan acts to avert nationwide rail strike set for sunday. The New York Times. July 9, 1982.

  • Ramey, V. A. (1989). Inventories as factors of production. The American Economic Review, 79(3), 338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, prediction, and search. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, N. R., & Granger, C. W. J. (1997). Impulse response functions based on a causal approach to residual orthogonalization in vector autoregressions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92(437), 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takriti, S., Supatgiat, C., & Wu, L. S.-Y. (2001). Coordinating fuel inventory and electric power generation under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 16(4), 603–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TETRAD V. (2015). http://www.phil.cmu.edu/projects/tetrad/current.html. Accessed August, 2015.

  • The American Presidency Project. (2017). Announcement of the establishment of Emergency Board No. 209 to investigate a railroad labor dispute. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=37287

  • Tsay, R. (2014). Multivariate time series analysis: With R and financial applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twisdale, L. A., & Chu, J. (1979). A decision methodology for coal inventory optimization. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-98(6), 1947–1957.

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Producer price index. http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?pc. Accessed February 15, 2015.

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2015). Study of rural transportation needs, chapter 5 coal transportation. https://www.ams.usda.gov/services/transportation-analysis/rti. Accessed February 6, 2017.

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2015a). Monthly energy review. http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/index.cfm?src=email#prices. Accessed February 15, 2015.

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2015b). Wholesale electricity and natural gas market data. http://www.eia.gov/electricity/wholesale/. Accessed February 15, 2015.

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2016). Coal explained. http://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.cfm?page=coal_home. Accessed February 6, 2017.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2015). Overview of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. http://epa.gov/oar/caa/caaa_overview.html. Accessed March 6, 2015.

  • U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (2015a). Order No. 636—Restructuring of pipeline services. http://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/land-docs/restruct.asp. Accessed March 6, 2015.

  • U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (2015b). Order No. 888. http://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/land-docs/order888.asp. Accessed March 6, 2015.

  • U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (2015c). Order No. 2000. http://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/land-docs/RM99-2A.pdf. Accessed March 6, 2015.

  • U.S. Federal Railroad Administration. (2011). Impact of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980. https://www.fra.dot.gov/eLib/Details/L03012. Accessed March 6, 2015.

  • U.S. Federal Reserve. (2015). Moody’s Seasoned Aaa Corporate Bond Rates. http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/data.htm. Accessed February 15, 2015.

  • U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2015). National Climate Data Center. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/documentlibrary/hcs/hcs.html. Accessed February 15, 2015.

  • Wang, Z., & Bessler, D. A. (2005). A Monte Carlo study on the selection of cointegrating rank using information criteria. Econometric Theory, 21(3), 593–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. W. (1994). Market-specific effects of rail deregulation. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyle E. Binder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Binder, K.E., Mjelde, J.W. Fuel inventory and price relationships in the U.S. electric power sector under regulatory and market change. J Regul Econ 51, 197–219 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-017-9319-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-017-9319-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation