Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical study of broadband diffusion in rural America

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we examine the factors that will encourage broadband adoption in rural areas. Using data on rural Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) we find that low density, high cost markets decrease the ability of the telecommunication service providers to offer DSL, but other factors also play a role. Demand for broadband has become more inelastic over time, marginal increases in speed alone have lost their appeal to customers, and the inclusion of video in a broadband package improves broadband take rates and willingness to pay. Small income elasticities reinforce our finding that broadband has become a necessity. Our analysis shows that price subsidies may not be effective in providing a large boost in demand, but policies that lower the cost of providing video may stimulate broadband adoption indirectly if the savings lead to more affordable bundled communications multimedia packages that users want.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bresnahan T. F., Reiss P. C. (1987) Do entry conditions vary across markets?. Brookings Papers in Economic Activities 18: 833–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudrie J., Dwivedi Y. K. (2006) Investigating factors influencing adoption of broadband in the household. Journal of Computer Information Systems 46(4): 25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Copps, M. J. (May, 2009). Bringing broadband to rural America: Report on a rural broadband strategy, Federal Communications Commission.

  • Crandall R. W., Sidak J. G., Singer H. J. (2002) The empirical case against asymmetric regulation of broadband internet access. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 17(1a): 953–987

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford G. (2000) The impact of the 1992 cable act on household demand and welfare. Rand Journal of Economics, 31(3): 422–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy-Deno K. T. (2003) Business demand for broadband access capacity. Journal of Regulatory Economics 24(3): 359–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flamm K., Chaudhuri A. (2007) An analysis of the determinants of broadband access. Telecommunications Policy 31: 312–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabel D., Kwan F. (2001) Accessibility of broadband telecommunication services by various segments of the American population. In: Compaine B. M., Greenstein S. (eds) Communications policy in transition: The Internet and beyond. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 295–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, V. (2000). NECA rural broadband cost study, NECA.

  • Glass, V. (November, 2001). NECA’s middle mile broadband cost study, NECA.

  • Glass, V. (June, 2006). The packet train needs to stop at every door, NECA.

  • Glass V., Talluto S. (2003) Cable TV is the next market for rural Telcos. Government Information Quarterly 20: 177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel R. K., Hsieh E. T., Nelson M. A., Ram R. (2006) Demand elasticities for Internet services. Applied Economics 38: 975–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goolsbee, A. (2001). The value of broadband and the deadweight loss of taxing new technology, Working paper, University of Chicago.

  • Goolsbee A. (2002) Subsidies, the value of broadband, and the importance of fixed costs. In: Crandall R., Alleman J. H. (eds) Broadband: Should we regulate high-speed Internet access?. Brooking Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 278–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Hande, P., Chiang, M., Calderbank, A. R., & Rangan, S. (2009). Network rate allocation with content provider participation. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, April 2009.

  • Heckman J.J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1): 153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan, J. (2009a). Obama’s online opportunities II: If you build it, will they log on? Pew Internet & American Life Project, January. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2009/PIP_BroadbandBarriers.pdf.

  • Horrigan, J., (2009b). Home broadband adoption 2009: Broadband adoption increases, but monthly prices do too, Pew Internet & American Life Project, June. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2009/Home-Broadband-Adoption-2009.pdf.

  • Howell, B. (February, 2002). Broadband uptake and infrastructure regulation: Evidence from the OECD Countries, New Zealand Institute for the Study of Completion and Regulation, Working paper BH 02/01.

  • Hu, W.-M., & Prieger, J., et al. (2008). Competition in Broadband Provision and the Digital Divide. In Y. K. Dwivedi et al. (Eds.), Handbook of research on global diffusion of broadband data transmission (Vol.1, pp. 241–259). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

  • Kridel D., Rappoport P., Taylor L. (1999) An econometric model of the demand for access to the internet. In: Loomis D. G., Taylor L. D. (eds) The future of the telecommunications industry: Forecasting and demand analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kridel D., Rappoport P., Taylor L. (2001) The Demand for High-Speed Access to the Internet: The Case of Cable Modems. In: Loomis D. G., Taylor L. D. (eds) Forecasting the Internet: Understanding the explosive growth of data communications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRose R., Gregg J. L., Strover S., Straubhaar J., Carpenter S. (2007) Closing the rural broadband gap: Promoting adoption of the Internet in rural America. Telecommunications Policy 31(6–7): 359–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden G., Savage S., Simpson M. (1996) Information inequality and broadband network access: An analysis of Australian household survey data, industry and corporate change. Oxford University Press, UK, pp 1049–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • National Telecommunicationa and Information Administration (2010). Digital Nation. 21st Century America’s Progress Toward Universal Broadband Internet Access. An NTIA Research Preview, February. Available at www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/2010/NTIA_internet_use_report_Feb2010.pdf.

  • Parks Associates (2009). The future of networked devices & digital content.

  • Prieger J. E. (2003) The supply side of the digital divide: Is there equal availability in the broadband internet access market?. Economic Inquiry 41(2): 346–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prieger J. E., Hu W. -M. (2008) The broadband digital divide and the nexus of race, competition, and quality. Information economics and Policy 20: 150–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappoport P. N., Kridel D. J., Taylor L. D. (2002) The demand for broadband: Access, content, and the value of time. In: Crandall R. W., Alleman J. H. (eds) Broadband: Should we regulate high-speed Internet access?. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappoport P. N., Kridel D. J., Taylor L. D., Alleman J. (2001) Residential demand for access to the Internet. In: Madden G. (eds) Emerging telecommunications networks: The international handbook of telecommunications economics Vol. II. Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, UK, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage S. J., Waldman D. M. (2005) Broadband Internet access, awareness, and use: Analysis of United States household data. Telecommunications Policy 29: 615–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage S. J., Waldman D. M. (2009) Ability, location, and household demand for internet bandwidth. International Journal of Industrial Organization 27(2): 121–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SpeedMatters. (2009). Affordable high speed Internet for America, SpeedMatters.org.

  • Varian, H. R. (2002). The demand for bandwidth: Evidence from the INDEX project. Available at http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~hal/Papers/brookings.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Glass.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glass, V., Stefanova, S.K. An empirical study of broadband diffusion in rural America. J Regul Econ 38, 70–85 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-010-9119-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-010-9119-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation