Skip to main content
Log in

The global minimum variance hedge

  • Published:
Review of Derivatives Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We explore futures hedging based on the global minimum variance strategy. As evidenced by using eleven of the world’s major stock market indexes and their corresponding futures contracts, the results show that the global minimum variance hedge may deviate statistically from the Ederington (J Finance 43(1):157–170, 1979) minimum variance hedge. We also present a regression approach to testing the hedge ratios and futures positions when the noise terms follow a normal distribution. In the illustration examined, we show that the global minimum variance hedge provides a more economically significant information ratio yield than that under the minimum variance hedge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. W., & Danthine, J.-P. (1981). Cross hedging. Journal of Political Economy, 89(6), 1182–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C., & Barbosa, A. (2007). Effectiveness of minimum-variance hedging. Journal of Portfolio Management, 33(2), 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, M. J., & Grauer, R. R. (1991). On the sensitivity of mean-variance portfolios to change in asset means: Some analytical and computation results, and the structure of asset expected returns. Review of Financial Studies, 4(2), 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodnar, T., & Okhrin, Y. (2013). Boundaries of the risk aversion coefficient: Should we invest in the global minimum variance portfolio? Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219(10), 5440–5448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G. E., & Thompson, S. R. (1986). Optimal commodity hedging within the capital asset pricing model. Journal of Futures Markets, 6(3), 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J., & Shanker, L. (1987). A risk-return measure of hedging effectiveness: A comment. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22(3), 373–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, V. K., & Ziemba, W. T. (1993). The effects of errors in means, variance, and covariance on optimal portfolio choice. Journal of Portfolio Management, 19(2), 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. G., de Silva, H., & Thorley, S. (2011). Minimum-variance portfolio composition. Journal of Portfolio Management, 37(2), 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ederington, L. H. (1979). The hedging performance of the new futures markets. Journal of Finance, 43(1), 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, C., & D’Antonio, L. (1984). A risk-return measure of hedging effectiveness. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 19(1), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. L. (1960). The theory of hedge and speculation in commodity futures. Review of Economics Studies, 27(3), 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahl, K. H. (1983). Determination of the recommended hedging ratio. American Journal of Agricultural Economics., 65(3), 603–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempf, A., & Memmel, C. (2006). Estimating the global minimum variance portfolio. Schmalenbach Business Review, 58(4), 332–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, C.-K., & Chen, K.-W. (1995). A risk-return measure of hedging effectiveness: A simplification. Journal of Futures Markets, 15(1), 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laws, J., & Thompson, J. (2005). Hedging effectiveness of stock index futures. European Journal of Operational Research, 163(1), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesmond, D. A. (2005). Liquidity of emerging markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(2), 411–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H. (1987). Futures, spots, stocks, and bonds: Multi-asset portfolio analysis. Journal of Futures Markets, 7(4), 383–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, D., & Shrestha, K. (2008). Hedging effectiveness comparisons: A note. International Review of Economics and Finance, 17(3), 391–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, M. (1992). Minimum variance hedge ratios for stock index futures: Duration and expiration effects. Journal of Futures Markets, 12(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satyanarayan, S. (1998). A note on a risk-return measure of hedging effectiveness. Journal of Futures Markets, 18(7), 595–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F. (1977). Linear regression analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, R. M. (1984). Optimal hedging policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 19(2), 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, E. (2005). Minimum-variance futures hedging under alternative return specifications. Journal of Futures Markets, 25(6), 37–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, L., & Daigler, R. T. (2013). A Markowitz optimization of commodity futures portfolios. Journal of Futures Markets, 33(4), 343–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges a partial financial support from the National United University through project 107-NUUPRJ-11.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wan-Yi Chiu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiu, WY. The global minimum variance hedge. Rev Deriv Res 23, 121–144 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-019-09159-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-019-09159-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation