Skip to main content
Log in

A new approach for option pricing under stochastic volatility

  • Published:
Review of Derivatives Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a new approach for pricing European-style contingent claims written on the time T spot price of an underlying asset whose volatility is stochastic. Like most of the stochastic volatility literature, we assume continuous dynamics for the price of the underlying asset. In contrast to most of the stochastic volatility literature, we do not directly model the dynamics of the instantaneous volatility. Instead, taking advantage of the recent rise of the variance swap market, we directly assume continuous dynamics for the time T variance swap rate. The initial value of this variance swap rate can either be directly observed, or inferred from option prices. We make no assumption concerning the real world drift of this process. We assume that the ratio of the volatility of the variance swap rate to the instantaneous volatility of the underlying asset just depends on the variance swap rate and on the variance swap maturity. Since this ratio is assumed to be independent of calendar time, we term this key assumption the stationary volatility ratio hypothesis (SVRH). The instantaneous volatility of the futures follows an unspecified stochastic process, so both the underlying futures price and the variance swap rate have unspecified stochastic volatility. Despite this, we show that the payoff to a path-independent contingent claim can be perfectly replicated by dynamic trading in futures contracts and variance swaps of the same maturity. As a result, the contingent claim is uniquely valued relative to its underlying’s futures price and the assumed observable variance swap rate. In contrast to standard models of stochastic volatility, our approach does not require specifying the market price of volatility risk or observing the initial level of instantaneous volatility. As a consequence of our SVRH, the partial differential equation (PDE) governing the arbitrage-free value of the contingent claim just depends on two state variables rather than the usual three. We then focus on the consistency of our SVRH with the standard assumption that the risk-neutral process for the instantaneous variance is a diffusion whose coefficients are independent of the variance swap maturity. We show that the combination of this maturity independent diffusion hypothesis (MIDH) and our SVRH implies a very special form of the risk-neutral diffusion process for the instantaneous variance. Fortunately, this process is tractable, well-behaved, and enjoys empirical support. Finally, we show that our model can also be used to robustly price and hedge volatility derivatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowitz M., Stegun I. (1964) Handbook of mathematical functions. Dover Publications, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn D., Gao B. (1999) A parametric nonlinear model of term structure dynamics. Review of Financial Studies 12: 721–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, L., & Piterbarg, V. (2004). Moment explosions in stochastic volatility models. Bank of America working paper.

  • Andersen L., Brotherton-Ratcliffe R. (1996) Exact exotics. Risk 9: 85–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, J. (2001). Credit explosives. Bank of America working paper.

  • Bakshi, G., Ju, N., & Yang, H. (2004). Estimation of continuous time models with an application to equity volatility. University of Maryland working paper.

  • Baldi P., Caramellino L., Iovino M.G. (1999) Pricing general barrier options: A numerical approach using sharp large deviations. Mathematical Finance 9: 293–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaglehole D., Dybvig P., Zhou G. (1997) Going to extremes: Correcting simulation bias in exotic option valuation. Financial Analysts Journal 53: 62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black F., Scholes M. (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. The Journal of Political Economy: 81: 637–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr P. (2001) Deriving derivatives of derivative securities. Journal of Computational Finance 4(2): 5–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr P., Madan D. (1999) Option pricing and the fast Fourier transform. Journal of Computational Finance 2(4): 61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacko G., Viceira L. (1999). Spectral GMM estimation of continuous-time processes. Harvard University working paper.

  • Champeney D. (1987) A handbook of Fourier theorems. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chourdakis, K. (2004). Option pricing using the fractional FFT. Queen Mary, University of London working paper.

  • Cox, J. (1975). Notes on option pricing I: Constant elasticity of variance diffusions. Stanford University working paper.

  • Cox J., Ingersoll J., Ross S. (1980) An analysis of variable rate loan contracts. The Journal of Finance 35(2): 389–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J., Ingersoll, J., & Ross, S. (1985). A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica, 53(2).

  • Duanmu, Z. (2004). Rational pricing of options on realized volatility—The black scholes way. Merrill Lynch working paper.

  • Dupire B. (1992) Arbitrage pricing with stochastic volatility. Societe Generale Division Options, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • El Babsiri M., Noel G. (1998) Simulating path-dependent options: A new approach. Journal of Derivatives 6(2): 65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath D., Jarrow R., Morton A. (1992) Bond pricing and the term structure of interest rates: A new methodology for contingent claim valuation. Econometrica 66: 77–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heston, S. (1997). A simple new formula for options with stochastic volatility. Washington University of St. Louis working paper.

  • Ishida, I., & Engle, R. (2002). Modelling variance of variance: The square root, the affine, and the CEV GARCH models. NYU working paper.

  • Javaheri, A. (2004). The volatility process: A study of stock market dynamics via parametric stochastic volatility models and a comparison to the information embedded in option prices. Ph.D. dissertation.

  • Jones C. (2003) The dynamics of stochastic volatility: evidence from underlying and options markets. Journal of Econometrics 116: 118–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. (2000). Option valuation under stochastic volatility: With mathematica code. Finance Press.

  • Merton R. (1973) Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4: 141–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, A. (1990). Volatility trading. London Business School working paper.

  • Poteshman, A. (1998). Estimating a general stochastic variance model from option prices. University of Chicago working paper.

  • Potter, C. W. (2004). Complete stochastic volatility models with variance swaps. Oxford University working paper.

  • Romano M., Touzi N. (1997) Contingent claims and market completeness in a stochastic volatility model. Mathematical Finance 7: 399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, P. (2003). Coupon bond valuation with a non-affine discount yield model. Department of Economics University of York working paper.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Carr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carr, P., Sun, J. A new approach for option pricing under stochastic volatility. Rev Deriv Res 10, 87–150 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-007-9014-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-007-9014-6

Keywords

Navigation