Skip to main content
Log in

Insider Ownership and Firm Value: Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Real estate investment trust (REIT) provides a unique laboratory to study the relation between insider ownership and firm value. One, a REIT has to satisfy special regulations which weaken alternative mechanisms to control agency problems. Empirically, I find a significant and robust nonlinear relation between Tobin's Q and REIT insider ownership that is consistent with the trade-off between the incentive alignment and the entrenchment effect of insider ownership. Two, many REITs are Umbrella Partnership REITs (UPREITs) which have dual ownership structure. They have both common shares and Operating Partnership Units (OP units). Property owners can contribute their properties to the UPREIT in exchange for OP units. Their capital gains taxes remain deferred as long as they hold onto their OP units and the UPREIT does not sell the properties they contributed. OP units owners are locked in with the firm and have incentive to monitor firm management, but their interests diverge from the common shareholders because their tax bases are much lower. Consistent with the trade-off between positive monitoring effect of OP units and tax-induced agency costs, I find that UPREIT's firm value increases with the fraction of OP units, but the effect is significantly weaker for the UPREITs where insiders hold OP units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrose B, Linneman P (2001) REIT organizational structure and operating characteristics. J Real Estate Res 21(3):141–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay M, Holderness C (1989) Private benefits from control of public corporations. J Financ Econ 25:371–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berle AA Jr, Means GC (1932) The modern corporation and private property. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhide A (1993) The hidden costs of stock market liquidity. J Financ Econ 34:31–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley M, Capozza D, Seguin P (1998) Dividend policy and cash-flow uncertainty. Real Estate Econ 26(4):555–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley J, Lease R, Smith C (1988) Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. J Financ Econ 20:267–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R, Ghosh C, Sirmans CF (2001) The information content of method of payment in mergers: evidence from real estate investment trusts. Real Estate Econ 29(3):361–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capozza D, Seguin P (2000) Debt, agency, and management contracts in REITs: the external advisor puzzle. J Real Estate Finance and Econ 20:91–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan SH, Leung WK, Wang K (1998) Institutional investment in REITs: evidence and implications. J Real Estate Res 16(3):357–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan SH, Erickson J, Wang K (2003) Real estate investment trusts: structure, performance, and investment opportunities. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho M-H (1998) Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: an empirical analysis. J Financ Econ 47:103–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz H (1983) The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. J Law Econ 26:375–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz H, Lehn K (1985) The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. J Polit Econ 93:1155–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz H, Villalonga B (2001) Ownership structure and corporate performance. J Corp Finance 7:209–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama E, Jensen M (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26:301–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Friday S, Sirmans S (1998) Board of director monitoring and firm value in REITs. J Real Estate Res 16:411–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Friday HS, Sirmans GS, Conver CM (1999) Ownership structure and the value of the firm: the case of REITs. J Real Estate Res 17(1):71–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh C, Sirmans CF (2003) Board composition, ownership structure and performance: evidence from real estate investment trusts. J Real Estate Finance Econ 26(3), March 2003:283–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell J, Kallberg J, Liu C (2005) The role of the underlying real asset market in REIT IPOs. Real Estate Econ 33:27–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin B, Weisbach M (1991) The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financ Manage 20(4):101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelberg C, Hubbard G, Palia D (1999) Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. J Financ Econ 53:353–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe J, Shilling J (1988) Capital structure theory and REIT security offerings. J Finance 43:983–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe J, Shilling J (1990) REIT advisor performance. AREUEA Journal 18(4):479–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh C-H, Sirmans CF (1991) REITs as captive-financing affiliates: impact on financial performance. J Real Estate Res 6(2):179–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M (1986) Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. Am Econ Rev 76:323–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3:305–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang L, Stulz R (1994) Tobin's Q ratio, corporate diversification and firm performance. J Polit Econ 102:1248–1280

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg E, Ross S (1981) Tobin's Q ratio and industrial organization. J Bus 54:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Loderer C, Martin K (1997) Executive stock ownership and performance: tracking faint traces. J Financ Econ 223–255

  • McConnell J, Servaes H (1990) Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. J Financ Econ 27:595–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck R, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1988) Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis. J Financ Econ 20:293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palia D (2001) The endogeneity of managerial compensation in firm valuation: a solution. Rev Financ Stud 14:735–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfect SB, Wiles KW (1994) Alternative constructions of Tobin's Q: an empirical comparison. J Empir Finance 1:313–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinai T, Gyourko J (2000) The asset price incidence of capital gains taxes: evidence from taxpayer relief act of 1997 and publicly-traded real estate firms. NBER Working Paper #7893, September 2000

  • Weston J (1979) The tender takeover. Mergers Acquis 74–82

  • White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Wruck KH (1989) Equity ownership concentration and firm value: evidence from private equity financings. J Financ Econ 23:3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X (2001) Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance: comment. J Financ Econ 62:559–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, B. Insider Ownership and Firm Value: Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts. J Real Estate Finan Econ 32, 471–493 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-006-6963-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-006-6963-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation