Skip to main content
Log in

Domination of methylene blue over rhodamine B during simultaneous photocatalytic degradation by TiO2 nanoparticles in an aqueous binary solution under UV irradiation

  • Published:
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simultaneous photocatalytic degradation of an aqueous mixture of methylene blue (MB) and rhodamine B (RhB) by anatase TiO2 catalyst under UV light irradiation was investigated. In the mixed solution, degradation rate and efficiency of MB (0.151 ± 0.013 min‒1, 92.3 ± 1.2%) was found to be much higher than for RhB (0.025 ± 0.003 min‒1, 20.5 ± 0.6%). This was in contrast to the degradation rate and efficiency of MB and RhB when they were in solution alone (0.173 ± 0.019 min‒1, 93.1 ± 1.1% and 0.115 ± 0.005 min‒1, 96.1 ± 1.2%). The domination of MB over RhB in the simultaneous photocatalysis was further confirmed by adding different molar fractions of each dye and using H2O2-assisted methods. These results can be explained by considering that the planar MB molecules have steric interactions inhibiting Coulombic attraction for RhB to the catalyst surface and suppressing its photocatalytic degradation efficiency. This paper provides an important insight into the governing factors during simultaneous photocatalytic removal of synthetic dyes during the treatment of multicomponent wastewater.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Scheme 1
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saini RD (2017) Textile organic dyes: polluting effects and elimination methods from textile waste water. Int J Chem Eng Res 9:121–136

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hagan E, Poulin J (2021) Statistics of the early synthetic dye industry. Herit Sci 9:33

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ardila-Leal LD, Poutou-Piñales RA, Pedroza-Rodríguez AM, Quevedo-Hidalgo BE (2021) A brief history of colour, the environmental impact of synthetic dyes and removal by using laccases. Molecules 26:3813

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Forgacs E, Cserháti T, Oros G (2004) Removal of synthetic dyes from wastewaters: a review. Environ Int 30:953–971

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zazouli MA, Kalankesh LR (2017) Removal of precursors and disinfection by-products (DBPs) by membrane filtration from water; a review. J Environ Health Sci Eng 15:25

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gadekar MR, Ahammed MM (2020) Use of water treatment residuals for colour removal from real textile dye wastewater. Appl Water Sci 10:160

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wawrzkiewicz M, Hubicki Z (2015) Anion exchange resins as effective sorbents for removal of acid, reactive, and direct dyes from textile wastewaters. In: Kilislioglu A (ed) Ion exchange-studies and applications. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/60952.

  8. Zhang M-H, Dong H, Zhao L, Wang D-X, Meng D (2019) A review on Fenton process for organic wastewater treatment based onoptimization perspective. Sci Total Environ 670:110–121

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buscio V, Brosillon S, Mendret J, Crespi M, Gutiérrez-Bouzán C (2015) Photocatalytic membrane reactor for the removal of C.I. disperse red 73. Materials 8:3633–3647

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Shahrin EWES, Narudin NAH, Padmosoedarso KM, Kusrini E, Mahadi AH, Shahri NNM, Usman A (2021) Pectin derived from pomelo pith as a superior adsorbent to remove toxic Acid Blue 25 from aqueous solution. Carbohydr Polym Technol Appl 2:100116

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arshadi M, Attard TM, Lukasik RM, Brncic M, da Costa Lopes AM, Finell M, Geladi P, Gerschenson LN, Gogus F, Herrero M et al (2016) Pre-treatment and extraction techniques for recovery of added value compounds from wastes throughout the agri-food chain. Green Chem 18:6160–6204

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang JL, Xu LJ (2012) Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment: formation of hydroxyl radical and application. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 42:251–325

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hisaindee S, Meetani MA, Rauf MA (2013) Application of LC-MS to the analysis of advanced oxidation process (AOP) degradation of dye products and reaction mechanisms. TrAC 49:31–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang XQ, Han SF, Zhang QW, Zhang N, Zhao DD (2018) Photocatalytic oxidation degradation mechanism study of methylene blue dye waste water with GR/iTO2. MATEC Web Conf 238:03006

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Javaid R, Qazi UY (2019) Catalytic oxidation process for the degradation of synthetic dyes: an overview. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:2066

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Phanichphant S, Nakaruk A, Chansaenpak K, Channei D (2019) Evaluating the photocatalytic efficiency of the BiVO4/rGO photocatalyst. Sci Rep 9:16091

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao S, Chen C, Ding J, Yang S, Zang Y, Ren N (2022) One-pot hydrothermal fabrication of BiVO4/Fe3O4/rGO composite photocatalyst for the simulated solar light-driven degradation of Rhodamine B. Front Environ Sci Eng 16:36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chiu YH, Chang TFM, Chen CY, Sone M, Hsu YJ (2019) Mechanistic insights into photodegradation of organic dyes using heterostructure photocatalysts. Catalysts 9:430

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chanu LA, Singh KJ, Devi KN (2020) Study on the photocatalytic activity of metal oxide nanoparticles towards the degradation of some organic dyes. Integr Ferroelectr 204:90–99

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Luttrell T, Halpegamage S, Tao J, Kramer A, Sutter E, Batzill M (2015) Why is anatase a better photocatalyst than rutile? -Model studies on epitaxial TiO2 films. Sci Rep 4:4043

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zulmajdi SLN, Zamri NII, Yasin HM, Kusrini E, Hobley J, Usman A (2020) Comparative study on the adsorption, kinetics, and thermodynamics of the photocatalytic degradation of six different synthetic dyes on TiO2 nanoparticles. React Kinet Mech Catal 129:519–534

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Blažeka D, Car J, Klobučar N, Jurov A, Zavašnik J, Jagodar A, Kovačević E, Krstulović N (2020) Photodegradation of methylene blue and rhodamine B using laser-synthesized ZnO nanoparticles. Materials 13:4357

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yin X, Liu L, Ai F (2021) Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue by WO3 nanoparticles under NIR light irradiation. Front Chem 9:683765

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Alaei M, Mahjoub AR, Rashidi A (2012) Effect of WO3 nanoparticles on Congo red and rhodamine B photo degradation. Iran J Chem Chem Eng 31:23–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Majumder D, Chakraborty I, Mandal K, Roy S (2019) Facet-dependent photodegradation of methylene blue using pristine CeO2 nanostructures. ACS Omega 4:4243–4251

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Li P, Zhang W, Zhang X, Wang Z, Wang X, Ran S, Lv Y (2018) Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic properties of flower-like Mn-doped ceria. Mater Res 21:e20180167

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang B, Guo L, He T (2016) Fabrication of an olive-like BiVO4 hierarchical architecture with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv 6:30115–30124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang L, Chen D, Jiao X (2006) Monoclinic structured BiVO4 nanosheets: hydrothermal preparation, formation mechanism, and coloristic and photocatalytic properties. J Phys Chem B 110:2668–2673

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wojtyła S, Baran T (2015) Semiconducting materials towards photocatalytic air treatment. materials, tests and practical application. Eur Chem Bull 4:260–267

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rochkind M, Pasternak S, Paz Y (2015) Using dyes for evaluating photocatalytic properties: a critical review. Molecules 20:88–110

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rani S, Aggarwal M, Kumar M, Sharma S, Kumar D (2016) Removal of methylene blue and rhodamine B from water by zirconium oxide/graphene. Water Sci 30:51–60

    Google Scholar 

  32. Baudys M, Zlámal M, Krýsa J, Jirkovský J, Kluson P (2012) Notes on heterogeneous photocatalysis with the model azo dye acid orange 7 on TiO2. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 106:297–311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yaseen DA, Scholz M (2019) Textile dye wastewater characteristics and constituents of synthetic effluents: a critical review. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:1193–1226

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Baranovskii SF, Bolotin PA, Evstigneev MP (2006) Aggregation of 1,3,7-trimethyl-xanthine with methylene blue in aqueous solution. J Appl Spectrosc 73:171–177

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mchedlov-Petrosyan NO, Kholin YV (2004) Aggregation of Rhodamine B in water. Russ J Appl Chem 77:414–422

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Asbollah MA, Mahadi AH, Kusrini E, Usman A (2021) Synergistic effect in concurrent removal of toxic methylene blue and acid red-1 dyes from aqueous solution by durian rind: kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamics, and mechanism. Int J Phytoremediation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2021.1901851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Houas A, Lachheb H, Ksibi M, Elaloui E, Guillard C, Herrmann JM (2001) Photocatalytic degradation pathway of methylene blue in water. Appl Catal B 31:145–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Vasanth Kumar K, Porkodi K, Rocha F (2008) Langmuir Hinshelwood kinetics—a theoretical study. Catal Commun 9:82–84

    Google Scholar 

  39. Armenise S, García-Bordejé E, Valverde JL, Romeo E, Monzón A (2013) A Langmuir-Hinshelwood approach to the kinetic modelling of catalytic ammonia decomposition in an integral reactor. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:12104–12117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shaban YA (2019) Solar light-induced photodegradation of chrysene in seawater in the presence of carbon-modified n-TiO2 nanoparticles. Arabian J Chem 12:652–663

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Selifonov AA, Shapoval OG, Mikerov AN, Tuchin VV (2019) Determination of the diffusion coefficient of methylene blue solutions in dentin of a human tooth using reflectance spectroscopy and their antibacterial activity during laser exposure. Opt Spectrosc 126:758–768

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Gendron PO, Avaltroni F, Wilkinson KJ (2008) Diffusion coefficients of several rhodamine derivatives as determined by pulsed field gradient–nuclear magnetic resonance and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. J Fluoresc 18:1093

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cruz GJF, Gómez MM, Solis JL, Rimaycuna J, Solis RL, Cruz JF, Rathnayake B, Keiski RL (2018) Composites of ZnO nanoparticles and biomass based activated carbon: adsorption, photocatalytic and antibacterial capacities. Water Sci Technol 2017:492–508

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Paul DR, Sharma R, Nehra SP, Sharma A (2019) Effect of calcination temperature, pH and catalyst loading on photodegradation efficiency of urea derived graphitic carbon nitride towards methylene blue dye solution. RSC Adv 9:15381

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sousa HR, Silva LS, Sousa PAA, Sousa RRM, Fonseca MG, Osajima JA, Silva-Filho EC (2019) Evaluation of methylene blue removal by plasma activated palygorskites. J Mater Res Technol 8:5432–5442

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mencigar DP, Strlič M, Štangar UL, Korošec RC (2013) Hydroxyl radical scavenging-based method for evaluation of TiO2 photocatalytic activity. Acta Chim Slov 60:908–912

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Poulios I, Avranas A, Rekliti E, Zouboulis A (2000) Photocatalytic oxidation of Auramine O in the presence of semiconducting oxides. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 75:205–212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Reza KM, Kurny ASW, Gulshan F (2017) Parameters affecting the photocatalytic degradation of dyes using TiO2: a review. Appl Water Sci 7:1569–1578

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. He X, Male KB, Nesterenko PN, Brabazon D, Paull B, Luong JH (2013) Adsorption and desorption of methylene blue on porous carbon monoliths and nanocrystalline cellulose. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:8796–8804

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Merouani S, Hamdaoui O, Saoudi F, Chiha M (2010) Sonochemical degradation of Rhodamine B in aqueous phase: effects of additives. Chem Eng J 158:550–557

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kamaluddin MR, Zamri NII, Kusrini E, Prihandini WW, Mahadi AH, Usman A (2021) Photocatalytic activity of kaolin-titania composites to degrade methylene blue under UV light irradiation; kinetics, mechanism and thermodynamics. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 113:517–529

    Google Scholar 

  52. Nguyen LT, Nguyen HT, Pham TD, Tran TD, Chu HT, Dang HT, Nguyen VH, Nguyen KM, Pham TT, van der Bruggen B (2020) UV–visible light driven photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin by N, S co-doped TiO2: the effect of operational parameters. Top Catal 63:985–995

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Hirakawa T, Yawata K, Nosaka Y (2007) Photocatalytic reactivity for O2•− and OH radical formation in anatase and rutile TiO2 suspension as the effect of H2O2 addition. Appl Catal A 325:105–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

JH is grateful to NCKU90 for providing his Distinguished Visiting Scientist position.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anwar Usman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 404 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suhaimi, N.A.A., Shahri, N.N.M., Samat, J.H. et al. Domination of methylene blue over rhodamine B during simultaneous photocatalytic degradation by TiO2 nanoparticles in an aqueous binary solution under UV irradiation. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 135, 511–527 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-021-02098-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-021-02098-2

Keywords

Navigation