Skip to main content
Log in

Return map analysis of the highly nonlinear Bray–Liebhafsky reaction model

  • Published:
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By numerically simulated Bray–Liebhafsky (BL) reaction under a continuously fed well stirred tank reactor (CSTR) conditions, we discussed the attractors and Poincaré 1D maps with respect to flow rate as the control parameter. The new technique of the return maps from transient trajectories over the slow manifold is developed and applied in order to explore its multilayered structure related to dynamical states (periodic and aperiodic -chaotic oscillating modes) of the system. Kinetic relations underlying the slow manifold structure are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The position of the section plane is indicated in the Fig. 2 by right part of the black horizontal line 2.

References

  1. Field RJ, Burger M (1985) Oscillations and travelling waves in chemical systems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Strizhak PE, Ali F, Menzinger M (1999) J Phys Chem A 103:10866–10873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Field RJ, Schneider FW (1989) J Chem Educ 66:195–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kawczynski AL, Strizhak PE (2000) J Phys Chem 112:6122–6130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bray WC (1921) J Am Chem Soc 43:1262–1267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Furrow SD, Noyes RM (1982) J Am Chem Soc 104:38–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Furrow SD, Noyes RM (1982) J Am Chem Soc 104:42–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bray WC, Liebhafsky HA (1931) J Am Chem Soc 53:38–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Khavrus VO, Strizhak PE, Kawczynski AL (2003) Chaos 13:112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawczynski AL, Khavrus VO, Strizhak PE (2000) Chaos 10:299–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Strogatz SH (1994) Non-linear dynamics and chaos with applications to physics, biology, chemistry and engineering, Perseus Books Publishing. L.L.C, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kolar-Anić Lj, Mišljenović Đ, Anić S, Nikolis G (1995) React Kinet Catal Lett 54:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kolar-Anić Lj, Čupić Ž, Schmitz G, Anić S (2010) Chem Eng Sci 65:3718–3728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blagojević S, Čupić Ž, Ivanović-Šašić A, Kolar-Anić Lj (2015) Russ J Phys Chem A 13:2349–2358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ivanovic-Šašić A, Marković V, Anić S, Kolar-Anić Lj, Čupić Ž (2011) Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:20162–20171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Čupić Ž, Ivanović-Šašić A, Anić S, Stanković B, Maksimović J, Kolar-Anić Lj, Schmitz G (2013) MATCH Commun Math Comput Chem 69:805–830

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maselko J, Swinney HL (1986) J Chem Phys 85:6430–6441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Popović N (2008) J Phys 138:012020. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/138/1/012020

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schmitz G, Kolar-Anić Lj, Anić S, Grozdić T, Vukojević V (2006) J Chem Phys A 110:10361–10368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stanković B, Čupić Ž, Pejić N, Kolar-Anić Lj (2013) JAND J Appl Nonlinear Dyn 2:285–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ivanović AZ, Čupić ŽD, Janković MM, Kolar-Anić Lj, Anić SR (2008) Phys Chem Chem Phys 10:5848–5858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scott S (1991) Chemical chaos. Clarendon press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  23. Desroches M, Krauskopf B, Osinga HM (2008) SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst 7:1131–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The support of this research by the Ministry of Education and Science of Republic of Serbia through projects No.172015 and 45001 is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Željko Čupić.

Appendix: Standard numerical methods

Appendix: Standard numerical methods

In the return map method, the attractor is first cut by the selected surface in the phase space. Furthermore, only those points are identified where trajectory passes through the selected surface from one chosen direction. Hence, each cycle is counted only once. Thus, quasi-continuous trajectory (line) is completely discretized—transformed to a set of points in the surface. However, the connection between the points is not obvious any more leaving us without the information about their sequence in time. Since we have this information from the original data series, we can use it to construct two-dimensional map, equivalent to the Poincare section, by plotting one chosen variable of the precursor point, against the same variable for the successor point. The Poincaré map, or return map is created this way [22]. Period doubling is indicated by duplicated number of corresponding cross points in the map in comparison to their number in previous dynamical state of the period doubling sequence. Thus, in the case of periodic motions, cross points have finite number and are distinctively localized in the map. In the case of chaotic dynamics, in contrast to periodicity, cross points continuously fill in a part of the map.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Čupić, Ž., Ivanović-Šašić, A., Blagojević, S. et al. Return map analysis of the highly nonlinear Bray–Liebhafsky reaction model. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 118, 27–38 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-016-0998-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-016-0998-5

Keywords

Navigation