Abstract
Purpose
To compare importance ratings of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) items from the viewpoints of childhood cancer survivors, parents, and clinicians for further developing short-forms to use in survivorship care.
Methods
101 cancer survivors, 101 their parents, and 36 clinicians were recruited from St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. Participants were asked to select eight items that they deemed useful for clinical decision making from each of the four Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric item banks. These item banks were pain interference (20 items), fatigue (23 items), psychological stress (19 items), and positive affect (37 items).
Results
Compared to survivors, clinicians rated more items across four domains that were statistically different than did parents (23 vs. 13 items). Clinicians rated five items in pain interference domain (ORs 2.33–6.01; p’s < 0.05) and three items in fatigue domain (ORs 2.22–3.80; p’s < .05) as more important but rated three items in psychological stress domain (ORs 0.14–0.42; p’s < .05) and six items in positive affect domain (ORs 0.17–0.35; p’s < .05) as less important than did survivors. In contrast, parents rated seven items in positive affect domain (ORs 0.25–0.47; p’s < .05) as less important than did survivors.
Conclusions
Survivors, parents, and clinicians viewed importance of PRO items for survivorship care differently. These perspectives should be used to assist the development of PROs tools.
References
American Cancer Society (2014). Special section: Childhood & adolescent cancers. In American cancer society, cancer facts & figures 2014 (pp. 25–42). Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.
Klassen, A. F., Anthony, S. J., Khan, A., Sung, L., & Klaassen, R. (2011). Identifying determinants of quality of life of children with cancer and childhood cancer survivors: A systematic review. Supportive Care Cancer, 19(9), 1275–1287.
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11.
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.
Hinds, P. S., Nuss, S. L., Ruccione, K. S., Withycombe, J. S., Jacobs, S., DeLuca, H., et al. (2013). PROMIS pediatric measures in pediatric oncology: Valid and clinically feasible indicators of patient-reported outcomes. Pediatric Blood Cancer, 60(3), 402–408.
DeWalt, D. A., Gross, H. E., Gipson, D. S., Selewski, D. T., DeWitt, E. M., Dampier, C. D., et al. (2015). PROMIS((R)) pediatric self-report scales distinguish subgroups of children within and across six common pediatric chronic health conditions. Quality of Life Research, 24(9), 2195–2208.
Menard, J. C., Hinds, P. S., Jacobs, S. S., Cranston, K., Wang, J., DeWalt, D. A., & Gross, H. E. (2014). Feasibility and acceptability of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system measures in children and adolescents in active cancer treatment and survivorship. Cancer Nursing, 37(1), 66–74.
Matza, L. S., Patrick, D. L., Riley, A. W., Alexander, J. J., Rajmil, L., Pleil, A. M., & Bullinger, M. (2013). Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: Report of the ISPOR PRO good research practices for the assessment of children and adolescents task force. Value in Health, 16(4), 461–479.
Basch, E., Spertus, J., Dudley, R. A., Wu, A., Chuahan, C., Cohen, P., et al. (2015). Methods for developing patient-reported outcome-based performance measures (PRO-PMs). Value in Health, 18(4), 493–504.
Huang, I. C., Shenkman, E. A., Leite, W., Knapp, C. A., Thompson, L. A., & Revicki, D. A. (2009). Agreement was not found in adolescents’ quality of life rated by parents and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(3), 337–346.
Upton, P., Lawford, J., & Eiser, C. (2008). Parent-child agreement across child health-related quality of life instruments: A review of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 17(6), 895–913.
Russell, K. M., Hudson, M., Long, A., & Phipps, S. (2006). Assessment of health-related quality of life in children with cancer: Consistency and agreement between parent and child reports. Cancer, 106(10), 2267–2274.
Waters, E. B., Wake, M. A., Hesketh, K. D., Ashley, D. M., & Smibert, E. (2003). Health-related quality of life of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: Comparisons and correlations between parent and clinician reports. International Journal of Cancer, 103(4), 514–518.
Morrow, A. M., Hayen, A., Quine, S., Scheinberg, A., & Craig, J. C. (2012). A comparison of doctors’, parents’ and children’s reports of health states and health-related quality of life in children with chronic conditions. Child Care, Health and Development, 38(2), 186–195.
Forrest, C. B., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Devine, J., Becker, B. D., Teneralli, R. E., Moon, J., et al. (2018) Development and evaluation of the PROMIS pediatric positive affect item bank, child-report and parent-proxy editions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(3), 699–718.
Bevans, K. B., Gardner, W., Pajer, K., Riley, A. W., & Forrest, C. B. (2013). Qualitative development of the PROMIS(R) pediatric stress response item banks. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 38(2), 173–191.
Varni, J. W., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Dewitt, E. M., Irwin, D. E., Lai, J. S., Yeatts, K., & Dewalt, D. A. (2010). PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference Scale: an item response theory analysis of the pediatric pain item bank. J Pain, 11(11), 1109–1119.
Lai, J. S., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Varni, J. W., DeWitt, E. M., Irwin, D. E., et al. (2013). Development and psychometric properties of the PROMIS((R)) pediatric fatigue item banks. Quality of Life Research, 22(9), 2417–2427.
Collins, J. J., Byrnes, M. E., Dunkel, I. J., Lapin, J., Nadel, T., Thaler, H. T., et al. (2000). The measurement of symptoms in children with cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 19(5), 363–377.
Stuber, M. L., Meeske, K. A., Leisenring, W., Stratton, K., Zeltzer, L. K., Dawson, K., et al. (2011). Defining medical posttraumatic stress among young adult survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. General Hospital Psychiatry, 33(4), 347–353.
Spencer, D. (2009). Card sorting: Designing usable categories. Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld Media.
DeWitt, E. M., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Irwin, D. E., Langer, M., Varni, J. W., et al. (2011). Construction of the eight-item patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pediatric physical function scales: Built using item response theory. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(7), 794–804.
Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B., Langer, M. M., Thissen, D., Dewitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., et al. (2010). An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 595–607.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., Devine, J., Bevans, K., Riley, A. W., Moon, J., Salsman, J. M., & Forrest, C. B. (2014). Subjective well-being measures for children were developed within the PROMIS project: Presentation of first results. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(2), 207–218.
Yeatts, K. B., Stucky, B., Thissen, D., Irwin, D., Varni, J. W., DeWitt, E. M., et al. (2010). Construction of the Pediatric Asthma Impact Scale (PAIS) for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Journal of Asthma, 47(3), 295–302.
Funding
This stud is supported by the National Cancer Institute (U.S.) Grants P30 CA021765-33 (Roberts C) and U01 CA195547 (Hudson MM & Robison LL) and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin/National Institute of Health (U.S.) Grant U19 AR069525 (Forrest CB & Huang IC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital Institution Review Board approved the study protocol.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, C.M., Baker, J.N., Keesey, R.M. et al. Importance ratings on patient-reported outcome items for survivorship care: comparison between pediatric cancer survivors, parents, and clinicians. Qual Life Res 27, 1877–1884 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1854-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1854-z