Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Development and validation of a carers quality-of-life questionnaire for parkinsonism (PQoL Carers)

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Atypical parkinsonism (AP) has a considerable impact on the lives not only of patients but also of their carers. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument for assessing the quality of life (QoL) of carers of patients with AP.

Methods

A 40-item pool was generated from in-depth interviews with carers of patients with AP, a thorough review of the existing literature and consultation with movement disorder experts. Item refinement and reduction was performed using the results of pilot testing and a survey in 282 carers of multiple system atrophy (MSA) patients and 226 carers of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) patients. A validation study, with responses of 243 carers of MSA and 187 carers of PSP patients, was undertaken to evaluate the psychometric properties of the final 26-item scale.

Results

The validation study results suggest that the scale is unidimensional and has high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.96). The correlations of scale scores with patients’ health status and QoL measures, such as PDQ-39 summary score and EQ-5D index (Spearman’s ρ = 0.56 and −0.31, respectively, P < 0.001), as well as carers’ measures, such as Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) total and EQ-5D index (Spearman’s ρ = 0.85 and −0.39, respectively, P < 0.001), document the convergent and concurrent validity of the scale. ANOVA results support the discriminant validity of the scale, as evidenced by its capacity to differentiate between carers with varying levels of self-reported health.

Conclusions

The 26-item Parkinsonism Carers QoL (PQoL Carer) is a concise instrument with adequate psychometric qualities that can be used for clinical and research purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schrag, A., Geser, F., Stampfer-Kountchev, M., et al. (2006). Health-related quality of life in Multiple Systems Atrophy. Movement Disorders, 22, 809–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schrag, A., Ben-Shlomo, Y., & Quinn, N. P. (1999). Prevalence of progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy: A cross-sectional study. Lancet, 354, 1771–1775.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schrag, A., Selai, C., Mathias, C., et al. (2007). Measuring health-related quality of life in MSA: The MSA-QoL. Movement Disorders, 22, 2332–2338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schrag, A., Selai, C., Quinn, N., et al. (2006). Measuring quality of life in PSP. Neurology, 67, 39–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jenkinson, C., Dummett, S., Kelly, L., et al. (2012). The development and validation of a quality of life measure for the carers of people with Parkinson’s disease (the PDQ-Carer). Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 18, 483–487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. The EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16, 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Novak, M., & Guest, C. I. (1989). Application of a multidimensional care-giver burden inventory. Gerontologist, 29, 798–803.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Peto, V., Jenkinson, C., & Fitzpatrick, R. (1998). PDQ-39: A review of the development, validation and application of a Parkinson’s disease quality of life questionnaire and its associated measures. Journal of Neurology, 245(suppl 1), S10–S14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrica, 35, 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dziuban, C., & Shirkey, E. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 358–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrica, 30, 179–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi, N., Fuqua, D. R., & Griffin, B. W. (2001). Exploratory analysis of the structure of scores from the multidimensional scales of perceived self-efficacy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 475–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Costello, A. B., Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 10. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7. Accessed December 15, 2014.

  16. Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Society for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Sarah Matheson Trust for Multiple System Atrophy (UK), and The Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP Europe) Association. We thank all the patients who participated and the patient organizations that supported this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

    Marios Pillas

  2. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK

    Caroline Selai, Niall P. Quinn, Andrew Lees & Anette Schrag

  3. Movement Disorder Program, Department of Neurology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA

    Irene Litvan

  4. Toronto Western Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Anthony Lang

  5. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA

    James Bower & Philip Low

  6. Institute for Ageing and Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    David Burn

Authors
  1. Marios Pillas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Caroline Selai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Niall P. Quinn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew Lees
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Irene Litvan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anthony Lang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. James Bower
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. David Burn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Philip Low
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Anette Schrag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anette Schrag.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pillas, M., Selai, C., Quinn, N.P. et al. Development and validation of a carers quality-of-life questionnaire for parkinsonism (PQoL Carers). Qual Life Res 25, 81–88 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1071-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1071-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation