Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Piper Fatigue Scale-Revised: translation and psychometric evaluation in Spanish-speaking breast cancer survivors

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most common and distressing symptom reported by breast cancer survivors. The primary aim of this study was to translate and evaluate psychometrically for the first time a Spanish version of the Piper Fatigue Scale-Revised (S-PFS-R).

Methods

One hundred and eleven women with stage I–IIIA breast cancer who had completed their primary cancer therapy in the previous 6 months with the exception of hormone therapy completed the S-PFS-R, the Profile of Mood States (POMS) Fatigue (POMS-F) and Vigor subscales (POMS-V), and bilateral force handgrip testing. Data analysis included test–retest reliability, construct validity, criterion-related validity, and exploratory factor analyses.

Results

Test–retest reliability was satisfactory (r > 0.86), and all subscales showed moderate to high construct validity estimates [corrected item-subscale correlations (Pearson r = ≥ 0.65)]. The exploratory factor analysis revealed four dimensions with 75.5 % of the common variance explained. The S-PFS-R total score positively correlated with the POMS-F subscale (r = 0.50–0.78) and negatively with the POMS-V subscale (r = −0.13 to −0.44) confirming criterion-related validity. Negative correlations among force handgrip testing, subscales, and total scores were weak (r = −0.26 to −0.29).

Conclusions

The Spanish version of PFS-R shows satisfactory psychometric properties in a sample of breast cancer survivors. This is the first study to translate the PFS-R into Spanish and further testing is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Mortimer, J. E., Barsevick, A. M., Bennett, C. L., Berger, A. M., Cleeland, C., DeVader, S. R., et al. (2010). Studying Cancer-Related Fatigue: Report of the NCCN Scientific Research Committee. Journal of National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 8, 1331–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reyes-Gibby, C. C., Anderson, K. O., Shete, S., Bruarea, E., & Yennurajalingam, S. (2012). Early referral to supportive care specialists for symptom burden in lung cancer patients. Cancer, 18, 856–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2012. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/index. Accessed January 1, 2012.

  4. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures for Hispanics/Latinos 2009–2011. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerFactsFiguresforHispanicsLatinos/index. Accessed February 1, 2011.

  5. Den Oudsten, B. L., Van Heck, G. L., Van der Steeg, A. F., Roukema, J. A., & De Vries, J. (2009). The WHOQOL-100 has good psychometric properties in breast cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Agasi-Idenburg, C., Velthuis, M., & Wittink, H. (2010). Quality criteria and user-friendliness in self-reported questionnaires on cancer-related fatigue: A review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 705–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Piper, B. F., Dibble, S. L., Dodd, M. J., Weiss, M. C., Slaughter, R. E., & Paul, S. M. (1998). The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: Psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 25, 677–684.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giacalone, A., Polesel, J., De Paoli, A., Colussi, A. M., Sartor, L., Talamini, R., et al. (2010). Assessing cancer-related fatigue: The psychometric properties of the Revised Piper Fatigue Scale in Italian cancer inpatients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 18, 1191–1197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. So, W. K. W., Dogson, J., & Tai, J. T. W. (2003). Fatigue and quality of life among Chinese patients with hematologic malignancy after bone marrow transplantation. Cancer Nursing, 26, 211–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gledhill, J. A., Rodary, C., Mahé, C., & Laizet, C. (2002). Validation française de l’échelle de fatigue révisée de Piper [French validation of the revised Piper Fatigue Scale]. Recherche en Soins Infirmiers, 68, 50–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dagnelie, P. C., Pijls-Johannesma, M. C. G., Pijpe, A., Boumans, B. J., Skrabanja, A. T., Lambin, P., et al. (2006). Psychometric properties of the revised Piper Fatigue Scale in Dutch cancer patients were satisfactory. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 642–649.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis, M. P. (2009). Ethnologue languages of the world (16th ed.). Dallas Tex: SIL International.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baro, E., Carulla, J., Cassinello, J., Colomer, R., Mata, J. G., Gascón, P., et al. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Perform Questionnaire: A brief scale for assessing patient perceptions of fatigue in cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 19, 657–666.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417–1432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Andrade, E. M., Arce, C., & Seoane, G. (2002). Adaptación al español del cuestionario “Perfil de los Estados de Ánimo” en una muestra de deportistas [Spanish adaptation of the questionnaire “Profile of Mood States” in a sample of athletes]. Psicothema, 14, 708–713.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meek, P., Nail, L. M., Barsevick, A., Schwartz, A. L., Stephen, S., Whitmer, K., et al. (2000). Psychometric testing of fatigue instruments for use with cancer patients. Nursing Research, 49, 181–190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). Analysis of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various Chi square approximations. Journal of Royal Statistics Society, 16, 296–298.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cantarero-Villanueva, I., Fernández-Lao, C., Díaz-Rodríguez, L., Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C., Ruiz, J. R., & Arroyo-Morales, M. (2012). The handgrip strength test as a measure of function in breast cancer survivors: Relationship to cancer-related symptoms and physical and physiologic parameters. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 774–782.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to all participants without whom this work would not have been possible. This study was supported by a grant from the Health Institute Carlos III and PN I + D+I 2008–2011, Madrid, Spanish Government (FIS PI10/02749-02764), a grant from the Andalusian Health Service, Junta de Andalucia (PI-0457-2010).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Arroyo-Morales.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cantarero-Villanueva, I., Fernández-Lao, C., Díaz-Rodríguez, L. et al. The Piper Fatigue Scale-Revised: translation and psychometric evaluation in Spanish-speaking breast cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 23, 271–276 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0434-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0434-5

Keywords

Navigation