Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric testing of the Chinese Mandarin version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey in patients with coronary heart disease in mainland China

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese Mandarin version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS-CM) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) in mainland China.

Methods

Measurement performance of the MOS-SSS-CM was tested on a convenience sample of 200 Chinese patients with CHD in a University-affiliated hospital in Xi’an, P. R. China. To establish reliability of the instrument, 40 patients were retested 2 weeks later through telephone interview. The traditional Chinese version of the MOS-SSS was transformed into a simplified Chinese Mandarin version and administered to participants, together with Chinese Mandarin versions of the Short Form-36 item Health Survey (SF-36) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

Results

The MOS-SSS-CM had acceptable internal consistency with Cronbach α coefficients of 0.91 for the overall scale and 0.71–0.84 for the four subscales. The high correlation (r = 0.56–0.87) between items and the remainder of the scale provides further evidence of internal consistency. The test–retest reliability was generally acceptable with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.89 for the overall scale and 0.74–0.88 for the four subscales. There was acceptable concurrent validity with moderate significant correlations (r ≥ 0.3, p < 0.01) between the MOS-SSS-CM and the Chinese Mandarin version of the HADS. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a four-factor structure of the MOS-SSS-CM measuring the self-perceived adequacy of functional support of Chinese patients with CHD.

Conclusion

The MOS-SSS-CM is a valid and reliable measure for Chinese Mandarin-speaking patients with CHD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Rejai, S., Giardino, N. D., Krishnan, S., et al. (2012). Quality of life and baseline characteristics associated with depressive symptoms among patients with heart disease. Clinical Epidemiology, 4, 181–186.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Staniute, M., Brozaitiene, J., & Bunevicius, R. (2013). Effects of social support and stressful life events on health-related quality of life in coronary artery disease patients. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 28(1), 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roohafza, H., Talaei, M., Pourmoghaddas, Z., et al. (2012). Association of social support and coping strategies with acute coronary syndrome: a case-control study. Journal of Cardiology, 59, 154–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosworth, H. B., Siegler, I. C., Olsen, M. K., et al. (2000). Social support and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Quality of Life Research, 9, 829–839.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sherbourne, C. D., & Stewart, A. L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Social Science and Medicine, 32, 705–714.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu, D. S. F., Lee, D. T. F., & Woo, J. (2004). Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS-C). Research in Nursing & Health, 27, 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, W., Lopez, V., & Thompson, D. R. (2006). A Chinese Mandarin translation and validation of the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS). Quality of Life Research, 15, 1243–1249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ware, J. E., Kosinske, M., & Gandek, B. (2003). SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andrersen, E. M., & Meyers, A. R. (2000). Health-related quality of life outcome measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(Suppl 2), S30–S45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, W., Lopez, V., Chair, S. Y., et al. (2006). The psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the SF-36 health survey in patients with myocardial infarction in mainland China. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1525–1531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, W., Chair, S. Y., Thompson, D. R., et al. (2009). A psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with coronary heart disease. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(13), 1908–1915.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2008). Foundation of clinical research: Applications to practice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shyu, Y. I., Tang, W. R., Liang, L., & Weng, L. J. (2006). Psychometric testing of the social support survey on a Taiwanese sample. Nursing Research, 55(6), 411–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Soares, A., Biasoli, I., Scheliga, A., et al. (2012). Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey in Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(8), 1895–1900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Robitaille, A., Orpana, H., & McIntosh, C. N. (2011). Psychometric properties, factorial structure, and measurement invariance of the English and French versions of the Medical Outcomes Study social support scale. Health Reports, 22, 33–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11, 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The help of the patients, physicians and nurses who supported the study is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenru Wang.

Appendix: 简体中文版社会支持调查问卷

Appendix: 简体中文版社会支持调查问卷

以下的问题是一些有关您可获得的社会支持。

  1. 1.

    您有多少个相熟的亲人及朋友(这是指您觉得容易相处及能倾诉心事的对象),请写下相熟的亲人及朋友的数目:_____________,____________。

人们有时会向别人寻求相伴、帮助或其他形式的支持,请问在您需要时,您有多少时候能获得以下每一项的支持呢?

.

 

完全没有时候

少许时候

有些时候

大部分时候

所有时候

2. 如果您只限于卧床活动,有人是会给予您帮助

1

2

3

4

5

3. 在您需要找人倾诉的时候,您能够指望某些人来聆听您。

1

2

3

4

5

4. 对于困境,有人给您好的忠告。

1

2

3

4

5

5. 如果您有需要,有人是会带您去看医生。

1

2

3

4

5

6. 有人向您表达挚爱及对您的欢心

1

2

3

4

5

7. 有人和您一起欢度时光。

1

2

3

4

5

8. 有人给予您一些咨询,以帮助您明白当时的处境。

1

2

3

4

5

9. 有人得您信任或可向他倾诉您自己的事或问题。

1

2

3

4

5

10. 有人会呵护您。

1

2

3

4

5

11. 有人和您聚在一起轻松一番。

1

2

3

4

5

12. 如果您不能为自己烧饭,会有人为您预备。

1

2

3

4

5

13. 有些人的忠告正是您渴求的。

1

2

3

4

5

14. 有人与您一起做一些事,使您能放下心里的事情。

1

2

3

4

5

15. 当您身体不适,有人会替您处理日常锁事。

1

2

3

4

5

16. 有人分担您心底的恐惧及担忧。

1

2

3

4

5

17. 可向一些人求取有关如何处理个人问题的意见。

1

2

3

4

5

18. 有人和您一起做一些享乐的事情。

1

2

3

4

5

19. 有人明白您的问题。

1

2

3

4

5

20. 您爱某些人及有人令您感到被需要。

1

2

3

4

5

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, W., Zheng, X., He, HG. et al. Psychometric testing of the Chinese Mandarin version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey in patients with coronary heart disease in mainland China. Qual Life Res 22, 1965–1971 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0345-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0345-x

Keywords

Navigation