Skip to main content
Log in

Development of the Italian version of the 42-item Chronic Pain Coping Inventory, CPCI-I: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to translate and adapt the Italian version of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (CPCI) and validate the translation in subjects with chronic non-specific pain of the locomotor system.

Methods

The questionnaire was developed following international recommendations. The psychometric analyses included factor analysis, reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test–retest reliability (intraclass coefficient correlation, ICC), and construct validity by calculating the correlations between the subscales of the CPCI with measures of pain (numerical rating scale, NRS), disability (SIP-Roland Scale) and depression (CES-D) (Pearson’s correlation).

Results

The CPCI was satisfactorily administered to 270 subjects with chronic non-specific pain. Results of confirmatory factor analyses revealed that, of the CPCI-I 8 subscales, 6 demonstrated good data-model fit (CFI and NFI ≥0.90, RMSEA ≤0.08). Cronbach’s alpha was satisfactory in all of the subscales (0.71–0.80); the ICCs were good/excellent in all of the subscales (0.80–0.91). The correlations with the NRS, SIP-Roland and CES-D were poor in most cases as only the CPCI-Guarding subscale moderately correlated with disability (r = 0.31).

Conclusion

The CPCI was successfully translated into Italian and proved to have a good factorial structure and psychometric properties similar to the original and adapted versions. The use of the Italian version of the CPCI is recommended for clinical and research purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abbreviations

CPCI:

Chronic Pain Coping Inventory

CPCI-I:

Chronic Pain Coping Inventory, Italian version

α:

Cronbach’s alpha

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

r :

Pearson’s correlation

NRS:

Numerical rating scale

CES-D:

Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale

Nos:

Numbers

SD:

Standard deviation

CI:

Confidence interval

NSAIDs:

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

NIDDM:

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

CFI:

Comparative fit index

NFI:

Normed fit index

RMSEA:

Root-mean-square error of approximation

BS:

Bollen Stein

CFA:

Confirmatory factor analysis

References

  1. Mahoney, N. D., Devine, J. E., & Angres, D. (1999). Multidisciplinary treatment of benign chronic pain syndrome in substance abusing patients. Current Review of Pain, 3, 321–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jensen, M. P., Turner, J. A., Romano, J. M., & Strom, S. E. (1995). The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory: Development and preliminary validation. Pain, 60, 203–216.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenstiel, A. K., & Keefe, F. J. (1983). The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: Relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain, 17, 33–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hadjistavropoulos, H. D., MacLeod, F. K., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (1999). Validation of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory. Pain, 80, 471–481.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Romano, J. M., Jensen, M. P., & Turner, J. A. (2003). The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-42: Reliability and validity. Pain, 104, 65–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ektor-Andersen, J., Orbaek, P., & Isacsson, S. O. (2002). Behaviour-focused pain coping: consistency and convergence to work capability of the Swedish version of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34, 33–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia-Campayo, J., Pascual, A., Alda, M., & Gonzalez Ramirez, M. T. (2007). Coping with fibromyalgia: usefulness of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-42. Pain, 132, S68–S76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ko, Y., Park, W. B., & Lim, J. Y. (2010). Cross-cultural adaptation and clinimetric property of Korean version of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-42 in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 35(6), 666–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Truchon, M., Côté, D., & Irachabal, S. (2006). The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis of the French version. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 7, 13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong, W. S., Jensen, M. P., Mak, K. H., Tam, B. K. H., & Fielding, R. (2010). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (ChCPCI) in a Hong Kong Chinese population. Journal of Pain, 11(7), 672–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25, 3186–3189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mardia, K. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with application. Biometrika, 57, 519–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. In D. A. Kenny (Ed.), Methodology in the social sciences. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 34–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huskinson, E. C. (1974). Measurement of pain. Lancet, 2, 1127–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Salaffi, F., Stancati, A., Silvestri, C. A., Ciapetti, A., & Grassi, W. (2004). Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. European Journal of Pain, 8(4), 283–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Monticone, M., Baiardi, P., Nava, T., Rocca, B., & Foti, C. (2011). The Italian version of the Sickness Impact Profile-Roland Scale for chronic pain: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(15–16), 1299–1305.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fava, G. A. (1983). Assessing depressive symptoms across cultures: Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39(2), 249–251.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Atkinson, G., & Nevill, A. (1997). Comment on use of concordance correlation to assess the agreement between two variables. Biometrics, 52, 775–777.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2007). Quality of life. The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bollen, K. A., & Stein, R. A. (1993). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation modeling. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation modeling (pp. 11–135). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Truchon, M., & Cote′, D. (2005). Predictive validity of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory in subacute low back pain. Pain, 116, 205–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Kevin Smart for his help in preparing the English version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Monticone.

Additional information

IRB approval: The Institutional Review Board approved the study, which was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.

Appendix: CPCI—Chronic Pain Coping Inventory—Italian version

Appendix: CPCI—Chronic Pain Coping Inventory—Italian version

Durante la scorsa settimana per quanto giorni ha usato ciascuna delle seguenti strategie per fronteggiare il dolore che prova? Per cortesia, indichi il numero dei giorni in cui ha utilizzato ciascuna strategia di seguito elencata.

 

Domanda

Numero dei giorni

1. Ho visualizzato un’immagine calmante o distraente per rilassarmi

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2. Ho ignorato il dolore

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

3. Ho riposato

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

4. Ho ricevuto sostegno da un amico

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

5. Ho chiesto a qualcuno di fare qualcosa per me

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

6. Ho ricordato a me stesso che le cose potrebbero andare peggio

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

7. Ho evitato di utilizzare parti del mio corpo (per esempio, mano, braccio o gamba)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8. Mi sono concentrato a rilassare i miei muscoli

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9. Disteso sul pavimento, mi sono allungato e ho mantenuto la posizione per almeno 10 secondi

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

10. Ho detto a me stesso che le cose andranno meglio

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

11. Ho ricevuto supporto da un familiare

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

12. Mi sono riposato il più possibile

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

13. Ho parlato con qualcuno a me caro

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

14. Ho chiamato un amico al telefono, per sentirmi meglio

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

15. Ho pensato a tutte le cose belle che possiedo

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

16. Ho chiesto aiuto per svolgere un lavoro

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

17. Ho detto a me stesso che il dolore migliorerà

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

18. Non ho permesso che il dolore interferisse con le mie attività

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

19. Ho svolto attività aerobica (esercizio che fa battere il mio cuore più veloce) per almeno 15 minuti

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

20. Ho ridotto il cammino a causa del dolore

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

21. Non ho prestato attenzione al dolore

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

22. Ho zoppicato per ridurre il dolore

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

23. Ho meditato per ridurre le mie tensioni

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

24. Disteso sulla mia schiena, mi sono allungato, e ho mantenuto la posizione per almeno 10 secondi

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

25. Ho tenuto una parte del mio corpo (per esempio il braccio) in una posizione particolare

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

26. Ho chiesto aiuto per trasportare, sollevare o spingere oggetti

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

27. Mi sono esercitato per migliorare la mia condizione fisica generale per almeno 5 minuti

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

28. Ho parlato con un amico o un familiare per ricevere sostegno

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

29. Ho ricordato a me stesso che ci sono persone che stanno peggio di me

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

30. Ho limitato il mio tempo in piedi

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

31. Mi sono coricato sul letto

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

32. Ho evitato alcune attività fisiche (sollevare, spingere, trasportare oggetti)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

33. Ho usato tecniche di auto-ipnosi per rilassarmi

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

34. Ho continuato ad andare avanti

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

35. Ho allungato i miei muscoli, fino a sentire dolore, mantenendo la posizione per almeno 10 secondi

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

36. Ho evitato di svolgere le mie attività

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

37. Sono andato in una stanza da solo per riposarmi

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

38. Ho usato una respirazione lenta e profonda per rilassarmi

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

39. Mi sono esercitato per rinforzare i muscoli della mia schiena per almeno 1 minuto

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

40. Ho chiesto a qualcuno di prendermi qualcosa (ad esempio, medicine, alimenti, bevande)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

41. Non ho lasciato che il dolore influisse su ciò che stavo facendo

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

42. Mi sono coricato sul divano

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Monticone, M., Ferrante, S., Giorgi, I. et al. Development of the Italian version of the 42-item Chronic Pain Coping Inventory, CPCI-I: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity. Qual Life Res 22, 1459–1465 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0271-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0271-y

Keywords

Navigation