Abstract
Purpose
Evaluate reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire and its derivative FACT Hepatobiliary Symptom Indexes (FHSI-18 and FHSI-8) in people with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Methods
Self-reported questionnaire data from a randomized controlled Phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of conatumumab (AMG 655), ganitumab (AMG 479) or placebo combined with gemcitabine were evaluated. The following were assessed: internal consistency, using Cronbach’s α; discriminant validity, comparing baseline patient-reported outcomes (PRO) scores across Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) levels; and ability to detect change, comparing change from baseline PRO score at each cycle across PS and tumour response groups.
Results
The analysis included 96 patients. All scale scores demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α > 0.7) and discriminant validity. Baseline scores were significantly poorer among patients with PS = 1 versus patients with PS = 0 (e.g. difference in FACT-Hep total score −17.27; p < 0.001). Ability to detect change was established for Cycles 2/3 versus baseline; PRO scores reduced in the PS-worsened group versus the PS-stable group (e.g. difference in FACT-Hep total score −24.29; p < 0.001). All PRO scale scores showed significant decline for progressive disease versus stable disease (e.g. difference in FACT-Hep total score −12.58; p = 0.004). Changes on the FHSI-18 and FHSI-8 scales were similar in magnitude whether ECOG improved or worsened.
Conclusions
FACT-Hep detects change and is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferlay, J., Autier, P., Boniol, M., Heanue, M., Colombet, M., & Boyle, P. (2007). Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in (2006). Annals of Oncology, 18(3), 581–592.
Lockhart, A. C., Rothenberg, M. L., & Berlin, J. D. (2005). Treatment for pancreatic cancer: Current therapy and continued progress. Gastroenterology, 128(6), 1642–1654.
Bayraktar, S., & Rocha-Lima, C. M. (2010). Advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: Molecular targeted therapies. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, New York, 77(6), 606–619.
Moore, M. J., Goldstein, D., Hamm, J., Figer, A., Hecht, J. R., Gallinger, S., et al. (2007). Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A Phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(15), 1960–1966.
Fitzsimmons, D., & Johnson, C. D. (1998). Quality of life after treatment of pancreatic cancer. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery, 383(2), 145–151.
Fitzsimmons, D., Johnson, C. D., George, S., Payne, S., Sandberg, A. A., Bassi, C., et al. (1999). Development of a disease specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire module to supplement the EORTC core cancer QoL questionnaire, the QLQ-C30 in patients with pancreatic cancer. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. European Journal of Cancer, 35(6), 939–941.
Heffernan, N., Cella, D., Webster, K., Odom, L., Martone, M., Passik, S., et al. (2002). Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with hepatobiliary cancers: The functional assessment of cancer therapy—hepatobiliary questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(9), 2229–2239.
Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., et al. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(3), 570–579.
Cella, D., Webster, K., Chang, C. H., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., et al. (2000) Deriving a clinically meaningful symptom index from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) scale: The FHSI-8. Quality of Life Research, 9(3), 293 (Abstract #1591).
Yount, S., Cella, D., Webster, K., Heffernan, N., Chang, C., Odom, L., et al. (2002). Assessment of patient-reported clinical outcome in pancreatic and other hepatobiliary cancers: The FACT Hepatobiliary Symptom Index. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 24(1), 32–44.
Cella, D., Rosenbloom, S. K., Beaumont, J. L., Yount, S. E., Paul, D., Hampton, D., et al. (2011). Development and validation of 11 symptom indexes to evaluate response to chemotherapy for advanced cancer. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 9(3), 268–278.
Yost, K. J., & Eton, D. T. (2005). Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: The FACIT experience. Evaluations & The Health Professions, 28(2), 172–191.
Kindler, H. L., Richards, D. A., Stephenson, J., Garbo, L. E., Rocha Lima, H., Safran, J. S., et al. (2010) A placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study of conatumumab (C) or AMG 479 (A) or placebo (P) plus gemcitabine (G) in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28(15 suppl), abstract 4035.
Cella, D. (1997). Manual of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT) measurement system. Center on Outcomes, Research and Education (CORE), Evanston Northwestern Healthcare and Northwestern University, Evanston IL, Version 4. www.facit.org.
Webster, K., Cella, D., & Yost, K. (2003). The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT) measurement system: Properties applications, and interpretation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 79.
Cella, D. (1994). The manual of the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) measurement system (version 3). Chicago, IL, Rush- Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center, Rush University.
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy [FACIT] measurement system www.facit.org/FACITOrg/Questionnaires.
Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11(3), 193–205.
Guyatt, G., Walter, S., & Norman, G. (1987). Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(2), 171–178.
Colwell, H. H., Mathias, S. D., Turner, M. P., Lu, J., Wright, N., Peeters, M., et al. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of the FACT Colorectal Cancer Symptom Index (FCSI-9): reliability, validity, responsiveness, and clinical meaningfulness. The Oncologist, 15(3), 308–316.
Cella, D., Hahn, E., & Dineen, K. (2002). Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: Differences between improvement and worsening. Quality of Life Research, 11(3), 207–221.
Ringash, J., & Bezjak, A. (2001). A structured review of quality of life instruments for head and neck cancer patients. Head and Neck, 23(3), 201–213.
Lai, J. S., Beaumont, J. L., Ogale, S., Brunetta, P., & Cella, D. (2011). Validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue scale in patients with moderately to severely active systemic lupus erythematosus, participating in a clinical trial. Journal of Rheumatology, 38(4), 672–679.
Acknowledgments
Medical writing assistance was provided by ApotheCom ScopeMedical Ltd, funded by Amgen Inc. All authors had full access to the data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript. This study was funded by Amgen Inc. Zeeshan Butt’s work on this manuscript was supported in part by grant KL2RR025740 from the National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health.
Conflicts of interest
SB and AB are current employees of Amgen Inc. AO is a former employee of Amgen Inc. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interests to declare in connection with the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cella, D., Butt, Z., Kindler, H.L. et al. Validity of the FACT Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire for assessing disease-related symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Qual Life Res 22, 1105–1112 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0217-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0217-4