Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of the Distress Thermometer to discern clinically relevant quality of life differences in women with breast cancer

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to explore the ability of Distress Thermometer (DT) scores to discern important differences in quality of life scores among women with breast cancer.

Methods

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network’s DT, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Breast (FACT–B), and a demographic questionnaire were completed by 111 women recently diagnosed with breast cancer.

Results

Patients considered moderately to severely distressed (score ≥ 4 on DT) scored significantly lower on FACT–B QOL scales and subscales when compared to those in the group scoring 3 or below. For those scales for which minimally important differences (MIDs) have been established, differences between the two groups were 2–3 and a half times the established MID.

Conclusions

Moderately to severely distressed patients have significantly lower QOL than those with expected or mild distress. The DT provides a quick and easy screening tool to alert the healthcare team to clinically relevant alterations in patients’ QOL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. (2011). Breast cancer: Prevention and control. Retrieved May 10th, 2011, from http://www.who.int/cancer/detection/breastcancer/en/.

  2. Howlader, N., Noone, A. M., Krapcho, M., Neyman, N., Aminou, R.,& Waldron, W. et al. (2011). SEER stat fact sheets: Breast. Retrieved May 10th, 2011, from http://www.seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html.

  3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2010). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Distress management. (Vol. v.1.2010). Jenkintown, PA: NCCN.

  4. Madden, J. (2006). The problem of distress in patients with cancer: More effective assessment. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 10(5), 615–619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fox, S. W., Lyon, D., & Farace, E. (2007). Symptom clusters in patients with high-grade glioma. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(1), 61–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pelletier, G., Verhoef, M. J., Khatri, N., & Hagen, N. (2002). Quality of life in brain tumor patients: The relative contributions of depression, fatigue, emotional distress, and existential issues. Journal of Neuro-oncology, 57(1), 41–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Manning Walsh, J. K. (2005). Social support as a mediator between symptom distress and quality of life in women with breast cancer. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 34(4), 482–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carlson, L. E., & Bultz, B. D. (2003). Cancer distress screening: Needs, models, and methods. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55(5), 403–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cella, D. F., & Cherin, E. A. (1988). Quality of life during and after cancer treatment. Comprehensive Therapy, 14(5), 69–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Institute of Medicine, National Research Council. (2005). From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrell, B. R., Grant, M. M., Funk, B., Otis-Green, S., & Garcia, N. (1997). Quality of life in breast cancer survivors as identified by focus groups. Psycho-Oncology, 6(1), 13–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Juarez, G., Ferrell, B. R., Uman, G., Podnos, Y., & Wagman, L. (2008). Distress and quality of life concerns of family caregivers of patients undergoing palliative surgery. Cancer Nursing, 31(1), 2–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Institute of Medicine [IOM]. (2008). Cancer care for the whole patient: Meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dabrowski, M., Boucher, K., Ward, J. H., Lovell, M. M., Sandre, A., Bloch, J., et al. (2007). Clinical experience with the NCCN distress thermometer in breast cancer patients. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 5(1), 104–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carlson, L. E., Angen, M., Cullum, J., Goodey, E., Koopmans, J., Lamont, L., et al. (2004). High levels of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patients. British Journal of Cancer, 90(12), 2297–2304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fallowfield, L., Ratcliffe, D., Jenkins, V., & Saul, J. (2001). Psychiatric morbidity and its recognition by doctors in patients with cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 84(8), 1011–1015.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Graves, K. D., Arnold, S. M., Love, C. L., Kirsh, K. L., Moore, P. G., & Passik, S. D. (2007). Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: Prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress. Lung Cancer, 55(2), 215–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Keir, S. T., Calhoun-Eagan, R. D., Swartz, J. J., Saleh, O. A., & Friedman, H. S. (2008). Screening for distress in patients with brain cancer using the NCCN’s rapid screening measure. Psycho-Oncology, 17(6), 621–625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sellick, S. M., & Edwardson, A. D. (2007). Screening new cancer patients for psychological distress using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Psycho-Oncology, 16(6), 534–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zabora, J., Brintzenhofeszoc, K., Curbow, B., Hooker, C., & Piantadosi, S. (2001). The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psycho-Oncology, 10(1), 19–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hegel, M. T., Moore, C. P., Collins, E. D., Kearing, S., Gillock, K. L., Riggs, R. L., et al. (2006). Distress, psychiatric syndromes, and impairment of function in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer, 107(12), 2924–2931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bultz, B. D., & Holland, J. C. (2006). Emotional distress in patients with cancer: The sixth vital sign. Community Oncology, 3(5), 311–314.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bultz, B., & Carlson, L. (2006). Emotional distress: The sixth vital sign—Future directions in cancer care. Psycho-Oncol, 15, 93–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shapiro, S., Lopez, A., Schwartz, G., Bootzin, R., Figueredo, A., Braden, C., et al. (2001). Quality of life and breast cancer: Relationship to psychosocial variables. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(4), 501–519.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jacobsen, P. B., Donovan, K. A., Trask, P. C., Fleishman, S. B., Zabora, J., Baker, F., et al. (2005). Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients: A multicenter evaluation of the Distress Thermometer. Cancer, 103(7), 1494–1502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kvale, E., Murthy, R., Taylor, R., Lee, J., & Nabors, L. (2009). Distress and quality of life in primary high-grade brain tumor patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 17(7), 793–799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2003). Distress management practice guidelines. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 1, 344–374.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cella, D. F. (1997). Manual of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT Scales) (Version 4 ed.). Evanston, IL: Evanston Northwestern Healthcare.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cohen, M., Hoffman, R. G., Cromwell, C., Schmeidler, J., Ebrahim, F., Carrera, G., et al. (2002). The prevalence of distress in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Psychosomatics, 43(1), 10–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roth, A., Kornblith, A. B., Batel-Copel, L., Peabody, E., Scher, H. I., & Holland, J. C. (1998). Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: A pilot study. Cancer, 82(10), 1904–1908.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Trask, P., Paterson, A., Riba, M., Brines, B., Griffith, K., Parker, P., et al. (2002). Assessment of psychological distress in prospective bone marrow transplant patients. Bone Marrow Transpl, 29, 917–925.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ransom, S., Jacobsen, P. B., & Booth-Jones, M. (2006). Validation of the distress thermometer with bone marrow transplant patients. Psycho-Oncology, 15(7), 604–612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mitchell, A. J. (2007). Pooled results from 38 analyses of the accuracy of distress thermometer and other ultra-short methods of detecting cancer-related mood disorders. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(29), 4670–4681.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoffman, B. M., Zevon, M. A., D’Arrigo, M. C., & Cecchini, T. B. (2004). Screening for distress in cancer patietns: The NCCN rapid-screening measure. Psycho-Oncology, 13, 792–799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., et al. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(3), 570–579.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Eton, D. T., Cella, D., Yost, K. J., Yount, S. E., Peterman, A. H., Neuberg, D. S., et al. (2004). A combination of distribution-and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57, 898–910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Brucker, P., Yost, K., Cashy, J., Webster, K., & Cella, D. F. (2005). General population and cancer patient norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Evaluation And The Health Professions, 28(2), 192–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Butt, Z., Wagner, L. I., Beaumont, J. L., Paice, J. A., Peterman, A. H., Shevrin, D., et al. (2008). Use of a single-item screening tool to detect clinically significant fatigue, pain, distress, and anorexia in ambulatory cancer practice. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 35(1), 20–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mitchell, A. J., Kaar, S., Coggan, C., Herdman, J., Mitchell, A. J., Kaar, S., et al. (2008). Acceptability of common screening methods used to detect distress and related mood disorders-preferences of cancer specialists and non-specialists. Psycho-Oncology, 17(3), 226–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vodermaier, A., Linden, W., & Siu, C. (2009). Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: A systematic review of assessment instruments. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 101(21), 1464–1488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Akizuki, N., Yamawaki, S., Akechi, T., Nakano, T., & Uchitomi, Y. (2005). Development of an impact thermometer for use in combination with the distress thermometer as a brief screening tool for adjustment disorders and/or major depression in cancer patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 29(1), 91–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bauwens, S., Baillon, C., Distelmans, W., & Theuns, P. (2009). The ‘Distress Barometer’: Validation of method of combining the Distress Thermometer with a rated complaint scale. Psycho-Oncology, 18(5), 534–542.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Quinten, C., Coens, C., Mauer, M., Comte, S., Sprangers, M., Cleeland, C., et al. (2009). Baseline quality of life as a prognostic indicator of survival: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from EORTC clinical trials. The Lancet, 10, 865–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Goodwin, P. J., Black, J. T., Bordeleau, L. J., & Ganz, P. A. (2003). Health-related quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer–taking stock. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 95(4), 263–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Calman, K. C. (1984). Quality of life in cancer patients–an hypothesis. Journal of Medical Ethics, 10(3), 124–127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Horner, M. J., Reis, L. A. G., Krapcho, M., Neyman, N., Aminou, R., & Howlader, N. et al. (Eds.). (2009). SEER cancer statistics review, 19752006 National Cancer Institute. Retrieved June 30, 2009, from http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/.

  47. Meyerowitz, B. E., & Oh, S. (2009). Psychosocial response to cancer diagnosis and treatment. In S. M. Miller, D. J. Bowen, R. T. Croyle, & J. H. Rowland (Eds.), Handbook of cancer control and behavioral science: A resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers (pp. 361–377). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Baucom, D., Porter, L., Kirby, J., Gremore, T., & Keefe, F. (2005/2006). Psychosocial issues confronting young women with breast cancer. Breast Disease, 23(1), 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Allen, S., Shah, A., Nezu, A., Nezu, C., Ciambrone, D., Hogan, J., et al. (2002). A problem solving approach to stress reduction among younger women with breast carcinoma: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer, 94(12), 3089–3100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Avis, N., Crawford, S., & Manuel, J. (2005). Quality of life among younger women with breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(15), 3322–3330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wong-Kim, E., & Bloom, J. (2005). Depression experienced by young women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 14, 564–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Parker, P. A., Baile, W. F., De Moor, C., & Cohen, L. (2003). Psychosocial and demographic predictors of quality of life in a large sample of cancer patients. Psycho Oncology, 12(2), 183–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cella, D. F. (1994). Quality of life: Concepts and definition. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 9(3), 186–192.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Overcash, J., Extermann, M., Parr, J., Perry, J., & Balducci, L. (2001). Validity and reliability of the FACT-G scale for use in the older person with cancer. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(6), 591–596

    Google Scholar 

  55. Brady, M. J., Cella, D. F., Mo, F., Banomi, A. E., Tulsky, D. S., Lloyd, S. R., Deasy, S., Cobleigh, M., & Shiomoto, G. (1997). Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15(3), 974–986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Anderson Head.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Head, B.A., Schapmire, T.J., Keeney, C.E. et al. Use of the Distress Thermometer to discern clinically relevant quality of life differences in women with breast cancer. Qual Life Res 21, 215–223 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9934-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9934-3

Keywords

Navigation