Abstract
Purpose
Normative data for WHOQOL-bref are scarce in the literature and unavailable in Latin American countries. The main objective of this study was to provide normative scores of WHOQOL-bref in a general population sample in Brazil and to describe differences in mean scores according to some socio-demographic characteristics.
Methods
WHOQOL-bref was applied to a randomly selected sample of the general population of Porto Alegre. Participants were literate people aged 20 to 64 years. The questionnaires were self-administered in the presence of an interviewer in the respondent’s home.
Results
The response rate was 68%, and the final sample contained 751 respondents (38% men, 62% women). Low quality of life was observed in the following subgroups: female gender, lower economic class, lower educational level, and the subgroup reporting a chronic medical condition. The mean scores of the WHOQOL-bref and percentiles of scores are reported as normative data for the general population.
Conclusion
Our results can be useful to researchers using the WHOQOL-bref to compare their results with normative data from a randomly selected sample of general population. Additionally, the ability of WHOQOL-bref to discriminate different population subgroups makes it an important tool to identify vulnerable groups in epidemiological surveys.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- WHOQOL:
-
World health organization quality of life instrument
- QOL:
-
Quality of life
- GDP:
-
Gross domestic product
- IBGE:
-
Brazilian institute of geography and statistics
- SPSS:
-
Statistical package for social sciences
References
Wilson, I. B., Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(1), 59–65.
Fleck, M. P., Louzada, S., Xavier, M., Chachamovich, E., Vieira, G., Santos, L., et al. (2000). Application of the Portuguese version of the abbreviated instrument of quality life WHOQOL-brief. Revista de Saude Publica, 34(2), 178–183.
The WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BRIEF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558.
The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties (1998) Social Science & Medicine, 46(12), 1569–1585.
Fleck, M. P., Louzada, S., Xavier, M., Chachamovich, E., Vieira, G., Santos, L., et al. (1999). Application of the Portuguese version of the instrument for the assessment of quality of life of the World Health Organization (WHOQOL-100). Revista de Saude Publica, 33(2), 198–205.
Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2007). Quality of life. The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (2nd ed.). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
Noerholm, V., Groenvold, M., Watt, T., Bjorner, J. B., Rasmussen, N. A., & Bech, P. (2004). Quality of life in the Danish general population–normative data and validity of WHOQOL-BREF using Rasch and item response theory models. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 531–540.
Ohaeri, J. U., Awadalla, A. W., & Gado, O. M. (2009). Subjective quality of life in a nationwide sample of Kuwaiti subjects using the short version of the WHO quality of life instrument. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 44(8), 693–701.
IBGE Cidades. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) Available from: www.ibge.gov.br. Last update 12.02.10.
Critério Econômico Brasil (2003). Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. Available from: www.abep.org/novo/default.aspx. Last update 12.02.10.
Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BRIEF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL-group. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 299–310.
Gandek, B., Ware, J. E., Jr. (1998). Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: The IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinlical Epidemiology 51(11), 953–959.
Kenny, C. (2005). Does development make you happy? Subjective wellbeing and economic growth in developing countries. Social Indicators Research, 73, 199–219.
Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: evidence from the USA. Science, 327(5965), 576–579.
Cruz, L. N., de Almeida Fleck, M. P., Polanczyk, C. A. (2010). Depression as a determinant of quality of life in patients with chronic disease: Data from Brazil. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45(10), 953–961.
Rabin, E. G., Heldt, E., Hirakata, V. N., & Fleck, M. P. (2008). Quality of life predictors in breast cancer women. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 12(1), 53–57.
Fleck, M. P., Lima, A. F., Louzada, S., Schestasky, G., Henriques, A., Borges, V. R., et al. (2002). Association of depressive symptoms and social functioning in primary care service, Brazil. Revista de Saude Publica, 36(4), 431–438.
da Silva Lima, A. F., & de Almeida Fleck, M. P. (2007). Subsyndromal depression: An impact on quality of life? Journal of Affective Disorders, 100(1–3), 163–169.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Research Incentive and Event Fund of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre for the financial aid in translating this article. Dr. Luciane Cruz received graduate research scholarship from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil. Prof. Polanczyk and Prof. Fleck received a research scholarship from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)/Brazil. This study was funded by CNPQ/Brazil (Edital MCT-CNPq/MS-SCTIE-DECIT No 36/2005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 1: Domains and facets within domains of WHOQOL-bref
Appendix 1: Domains and facets within domains of WHOQOL-bref
Domain 1 Physical health | |
1. | Pain and discomfort |
2. | Energy and fatigue |
3. | Sleep and rest |
9. | Mobility |
10. | Activities of daily living |
11. | Dependence on medical substances and medical aids |
12. | Work capacity |
Domain 2 Psychological | |
4. | Positive feelings |
5. | Thinking, learning, memory and concentration |
6. | Self-esteem |
7. | Bodily image and appearance |
8. | Negative feelings |
24. | Spirituality/religion/personal beliefs |
Domain 3 Social relationships | |
13. | Personal relationships |
14. | Social support |
15. | Sexual activity |
Domain 4 Environment | |
16. | Freedom, physical safety and security |
17. | Home environment |
18. | Financial resources |
19. | Health and social care: accessibility and quality |
20. | Opportunities for acquiring new information and skills |
21. | Participation in and opportunities for recreation/leisure activity |
22. | Physical environment (pollution/noise/traffic/climate) |
23. | Transport |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cruz, L.N., Polanczyk, C.A., Camey, S.A. et al. Quality of life in Brazil: normative values for the Whoqol-bref in a southern general population sample. Qual Life Res 20, 1123–1129 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9845-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9845-3