Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of functional constipation on quality of life of middle-aged Black Americans: a prospective case–control study

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To quantify the impact of constipation on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Black Americans.

Methods

Case–control design. Black subjects referred for colon cancer screening with a Bristol Stool Score of 3–5 for >75% of bowel movements served as controls. Frequency-matched functional constipation subjects had to fulfill Rome III criteria. Both groups completed demographic and health surveys. Short Form-36 assessed HRQoL.

Results

We recruited 102 constipated patients and 100 controls. The groups were well matched demographically. After adjustment for comorbidities, SF-36 scores for vitality, bodily pain, social functioning, and role-emotional were significantly lower in constipated patients. Unadjusted physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS) were significantly higher in the control group (47.1 ± 10.6 vs. 43.3 ± 8.6; P = 0.005 and 50.6 ± 12.4 vs. 43.4 ± 11.8; P < 0.001, respectively). After adjustment for comorbidities, PCS differences were no longer significant (P = 0.54); however, MCS differences were significant (P = 0.004). Marginal mean scores for the MCS for controls and constipated subjects were 49.9 ± 1.2 and 43.6 ± 1.2, respectively. The presence of a comorbidity was independently associated with PCS (P < 0.001) and MCS (P = 0.026) results.

Conclusions

Functional constipation has a significant impact on HRQoL in middle-aged Black Americans, particularly in regard to mental well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Abbreviations

HRQoL:

Health-related quality of life

PCS:

Physical component summary

MCS:

Mental component summary

SF-36:

Short form-36

FC:

Functional constipation

STC:

Slow-transit constipation

DD:

Dyssynergic defecation

GERD:

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

References

  1. Higgins, P. D., & Johanson, J. F. (2004). Epidemiology of constipation in North America: A systematic review. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 99(4), 750–759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glia, A., & Lindberg, G. (1997). Quality of life in patients with different types of functional constipation. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 32(11), 1083–1089.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Belsey, J., Greenfield, S., Candy, D., & Geraint, M. (2010). Systematic review: Impact of constipation on quality of life in adults and children. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 31(9), 938–949.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Irvine, E. J., Ferrazzi, S., Pare, P., Thompson, W. G., & Rance, L. (2002). Health-related quality of life in functional GI disorders: Focus on constipation and resource utilization. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 97(8), 1986–1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tuteja, A. K., Talley, N. J., Joos, S. K., Woehl, J. V., & Hickam, D. H. (2005). Is constipation associated with decreased physical activity in normally active subjects? American Journal of Gastroenterology, 100(1), 124–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wald, A., Scarpignato, C., Kamm, M. A., Mueller-Lissner, S., Helfrich, I., Schuijt, C., et al. (2007). The burden of constipation on quality of life: Results of a multinational survey. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 26(2), 227–236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Quigley, E. M., Vandeplassche, L., Kerstens, R., & Ausma, J. (2009). Clinical trial: the efficacy, impact on quality of life, and safety and tolerability of prucalopride in severe chronic constipation—A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 29(3), 315–328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arias, E., Rostron, B. L., & Tejada-Vera, B. (2010). United States life tables, 2005. National Vital Statistics Reports, 58(10), 1–132.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis, S. J., & Heaton, K. W. (1997). Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 32(9), 920–924.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Longstreth, G. F., Thompson, W. G., Chey, W. D., Houghton, L. A., Mearin, F., & Spiller, R. C. (2006). Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology, 130(5), 1480–1491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Jr, & Raczek, A. E. (1993). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31(3), 247–263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jenkinson, C. (1999). Comparison of UK and US methods for weighting and scoring the SF-36 summary measures. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 21(4), 372–376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kosinski, M., Zhao, S. Z., Dedhiya, S., Osterhaus, J. T., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2000). Determining minimally important changes in generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 43(7), 1478–1487.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Angst, F., Aeschlimann, A., & Stucki, G. (2001). Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 45(4), 384–391.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wolinsky, F. D., Miller, D. K., Andresen, E. M., Malmstrom, T. K., & Miller, J. P. (2004). Health-related quality of life in middle-aged African Americans. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59(2), S118–S123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan, A. O., Cheng, C., Hui, W. M., Hu, W. H., Wong, N. Y., Lam, K. F., et al. (2005). Differing coping mechanisms, stress level and anorectal physiology in patients with functional constipation. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 11(34), 5362–5366.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mason, H. J., Serrano-Ikkos, E., & Kamm, M. A. (2002). Psychological state and quality of life in patients having behavioral treatment (biofeedback) for intractable constipation. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 97(12), 3154–3159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Keefe, E. A., Talley, N. J., Zinsmeister, A. R., & Jacobsen, S. J. (1995). Bowel disorders impair functional status and quality of life in the elderly: A population-based study. Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 50(4), M184–M189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rao, S. S., Seaton, K., Miller, M. J., Schulze, K., Brown, C. K., Paulson, J., et al. (2007). Psychological profiles and quality of life differ between patients with dyssynergia and those with slow transit constipation. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 63(4), 441–449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Knottnerus, A., & Tugwell, P. (2008). STROBE—A checklist to Strengthen the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(4), 323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded, in part, by Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Deerfield, IL. Additional funding was provided by the National Institute of Health (Grant 1K24DK083268).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank K. Friedenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedenberg, F.K., Dadabhai, A., Palit, A. et al. The impact of functional constipation on quality of life of middle-aged Black Americans: a prospective case–control study. Qual Life Res 21, 1713–1717 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0089-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0089-z

Keywords

Navigation