Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An opportunity to refine our understanding of “response shift” and to educate researchers on designing quality research studies: response to Ubel, Peeters, and Smith

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is no advantage at this time to abandon the term “response shift” as suggested by Ubel et al. (Qual Life Res, 2010). The term is well known in the research field and has impacted the way we think about measuring quality of life (QOL) longitudinally. However, Ubel et al. (Qual Life Res, 2010) have provided the incentive to start an open dialogue on the subject with opportunities to refine the language of response shift and educate researchers. In this article, we identify opportunities in designing research studies to minimize or account for response shifts by considering the (1) selection of QOL concepts to measure, (2) questionnaires used to assess the QOL concepts, (3) design of the research study, (4) target population, and (5) analyses and reporting of results. Careful consideration of each of these issues will help us identify new methodologies and improved study designs that will move the QOL research field forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ubel, P. A., Peeters, Y., & Smith, D. (2010). Abandoning the language of “response shift”: A plea for conceptual clarity in distinguishing scale recalibration from true changes in quality of life. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9592-x.

  2. Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (2010). Do not throw out the baby with the bath water: Build on current approaches to realize conceptual clarity. Response to Ubel, Peeters, and Smith. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9611-y.

  3. Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2010). Guidelines for improving the stringency of response shift research using the Then-test. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9585-9.

  4. Willis, G. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rapkin, B. D. (2009). Considering the application of the trait/state distinction for response shift research: Continuing the conversation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1124–1125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Teresi, J. A. (2001). Statistical methods of examination of differential item functioning with applications to cross-cultural measurement of functional, physical and mental health. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 7, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oort, F. J. (2005). Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change. Quality of Life Research, 14, 587–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oort, F. J., Visser, M. R. M., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2005). An application of structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change in quality of life data from cancer patients undergoing invasive surgery. Quality of Life Research, 14, 599–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. King-Kallimanis, B. L., Oort, F. J., Visser, M. R. M., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2009). Measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift: An illustrative analysis of cancer patients’ health-related quality-of-life data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1157–1164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmed, S., Bourbeau, J., Maltais, F., & Mansour, A. (2009). The Oort structural equation modeling approach detected a response shift after a COPD self-management program not detected by the Schmitt technique. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1165–1172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barclay-Goddard, R., Lix, L. M., Tatec, R., Weinberg, L., & Mayo, N. E. (2009). Response shift was identified over multiple occasions with a structural equation modeling framework. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1181–1188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayo, N., Scott, C., & Ahmed, S. (2009). Case management post-stroke did not induce response shift: The value of residuals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1148–1156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Curran, P. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2003). The use of latent trajectory models in psychopathology research. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 526–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Outcomes Research Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, EPN 4088, 6130 Executive Blvd., MSC 7344, Bethesda, MD, 20892-7344, USA

    Bryce B. Reeve

Authors
  1. Bryce B. Reeve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryce B. Reeve.

Additional information

The views expressed here are those of the author only and do not represent any official position of the National Cancer Institute or National Institutes of Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reeve, B.B. An opportunity to refine our understanding of “response shift” and to educate researchers on designing quality research studies: response to Ubel, Peeters, and Smith. Qual Life Res 19, 473–475 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9612-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9612-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation