Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison between exploratory factor-analytic and SEM-based approaches to constructing SF-36 summary scores

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective To compare the two higher order factor structures of the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey, using exploratory factor analytic methods and structural equation modeling (SEM). Methods Two population data sets were used. A stratified representative sample (n = 1,005) of the Greek general population was approached for interview. This survey containing the SF-36 was used to obtain component score coefficients from principal components analysis and orthogonal rotation. These coefficients were then used in the second data set (n = 1,007) of the Greek adult general population to compute scores for the physical component summary and the mental component summary of the SF-36. The second data set was also used to obtain factor scores for physical and mental health measures, applying SEM. Results Exploratory factor analysis supported the existence of two principal components that are the basis for summary physical and mental health measures. SEM showed that models assuming that physical and mental health are correlated provided a better fit to the data than models assuming independence between physical and mental health. However, all eight dimensions of SF-36 should be included in the construction of summary scores. Conclusions These results confirm the multidimensional structure of the SF-36, the correlational equivalence between standard summary measures and SEM-based second-order factor scores, and underscore the feasibility of multinational comparisons of health status using this instrument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SEM:

Structural equation modeling

PCS:

Physical component summary

MCS:

Mental component summary

RMSEA:

Root mean squared error of approximation

References

  1. Geigle, R., & Jones, S. B. (1990). Outcomes measurement: A report from the front. Inquiry, 27, 7–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lansky, D., Butler, J. B. V., & Waller, F. T. (1992). Using health status measures in the hospital setting: From acute care to “outcomes management”. Medical Care, 30(Suppl), MS57–MS73. doi:10.1097/00005650-199205001-00006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Phillips, R. C., & Lansky, D. J. (1992). Outcomes management in heart valve replacement surgery: Early experience. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 1, 42–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alonso, J., Ferrer, M., Gandek, B., Ware, J. E., Aaronson, N. K., Mosconi, P., et al. (2004). Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: Results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project. Quality of Life Research, 13, 283–298. doi:10.1023/B:QURE.0000018472.46236.05.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baker, F., Haffer, S. C., & Denniston, M. (2003). Health-related quality of life of cancer and noncancer patients in medicare managed care. Cancer, 97, 674–681. doi:10.1002/cncr.11085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Camilleri-Brennan, J., & Steele, R. J. C. (2001). The impact of recurrent rectal cancer on quality of life. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 27, 349–353. doi:10.1053/ejso.2001.1115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (2003). SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln: QualityMetric Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ware, J. E., & Gandek, B. (1998). Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 903–912. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00081-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., Gandek, B., Aaronson, N. K., Apolone, G., Bech, P., et al. (1998). The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1159–1165. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00107-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ware, J. E., Gandek, B., Kosinski, M., Aaronson, N. K., Apolone, G., Brazier, J., et al. (1998). The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1167–1170. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00108-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ware, J. E., & Kosinski, M. (2003). SF-36 Physical and mental health summary scales: A manual for users of version 1. Lincoln: QualityMetric Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gandek, B., Sinclair, S. J., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E. (2004). Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36 Health Survey in medicare managed care. Health Care Financing Review, 25, 5–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gandek, B., Ware, J. E., Aaronson, N. K., Apolone, G., Bjorner, J. B., Brazier, J. E., et al. (1998). Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: Results from the IQOLA project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1171–1178. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00109-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cunningham, W. E., Nakazono, T. T., Tsai, K. L., & Hays, R. D. (2003). Do differences in methods for constructing SF-36 physical and mental health summary measures change their associations with chronic medical conditions and utilization? Quality of Life Research, 12, 1029–1035. doi:10.1023/A:1026191016380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Taft, C., Karlsson, J., & Sullivan, M. (2001). Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores? Quality of Life Research, 10, 395–404. doi:10.1023/A:1012552211996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ware, J. E., & Kosinski, M. (2001). Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: A response. Quality of Life Research, 10, 405–413. doi:10.1023/A:1012588218728.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 754–761. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.56.5.754.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wood, J. M., Tataryn, D. J., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1996). Effects of under-and overextraction on principal axis factor analysis with varimax rotation. Psychological Methods, 1, 354–365. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.4.354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hays, R. D., & Morales, L. S. (2001). The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Annals of Medicine, 33, 350–357. doi:10.3109/07853890109002089.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hays, R. D., Prince-Embury, S., & Chen, H. (1998). RAND-36 health status inventory. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wilson, D., Parsons, J., & Tucker, G. (2000). The SF-36 summary scales: Problems and solutions. Social and Preventive Medicine, 45, 239–246.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Anagnostopoulos, F., Niakas, D., & Pappa, E. (2005). Construct validation of the Greek SF-36 Health Survey. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1959–1965. doi:10.1007/s11136-005-3866-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pappa, E., Kontodimopoulos, N., & Niakas, D. (2005). Validating and norming of the Greek SF-36 Health Survey. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1433–1438. doi:10.1007/s11136-004-6014-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hays, R. D., Sherbourne, C. D., & Mazel, R. M. (1993). The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Economics, 2, 217–227. doi:10.1002/hec.4730020305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Keller, S. D., Ware, J. E., Bentler, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., et al. (1998). Use of structural equation modeling to test the construct validity of the SF-36 Health Survey in ten countries: Results from the IQOLA project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1179–1188. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00110-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hann, M., & Reeves, D. (2008). The SF-36 scales are not accurately summarised by independent physical and mental component scores. Quality of Life Research, 17, 413–423. doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9310-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hays, R. D., Revicki, D., & Coyne, K. S. (2005). Application of structural equation modeling to health outcomes research. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 28, 295–309. doi:10.1177/0163278705278277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Anderson, T. W., & Rubin, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factor analysis. In J. Neyman (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 5 (pp. 111–150). Berkeley: University of California Press.

  34. Simon, G. E., Revicki, D. A., Grothaus, L., & Vonkorff, M. (1998). SF-36 summary scores: Are physical and mental health truly distinct? Medical Care, 36, 567–572. doi:10.1097/00005650-199804000-00012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nortvedt, M. W., Riise, T., Myhr, K., & Nyland, H. I. (2000). Performance of the SF-36, SF-12, and RAND-36 summary scales in a multiple sclerosis population. Medical Care, 38, 1022–1028. doi:10.1097/00005650-200010000-00006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Farivar, S. S., Cunningham, W. E., & Hays, R. D. (2007). Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 Health Survey, v. 1. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 54. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schmitz, N., & Kruse, J. (2007). The SF-36 summary scores and their relation to mental disorders: Physical functioning may affect performance of the summary scores. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 163–170. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments and constructive suggestions received from Professor Ron Hays and the anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fotios Anagnostopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anagnostopoulos, F., Niakas, D. & Tountas, Y. Comparison between exploratory factor-analytic and SEM-based approaches to constructing SF-36 summary scores. Qual Life Res 18, 53–63 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9423-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9423-5

Keywords

Navigation